<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Amtrak Funding Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amtrak Cascades News - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-27191</link>
		<dc:creator>Amtrak Cascades News - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-27191</guid>
		<description>[...] further, WSDOT - which funds most Cascades service - is applying for some of the Amtrak money that Congress approved last summer.  You can see the list of projects here . If you look at the projects in the list, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] further, WSDOT &#8211; which funds most Cascades service &#8211; is applying for some of the Amtrak money that Congress approved last summer.  You can see the list of projects here . If you look at the projects in the list, [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amtrak Cascades News - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-27192</link>
		<dc:creator>Amtrak Cascades News - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-27192</guid>
		<description>[...] further, WSDOT - which funds most Cascades service - is applying for some of the Amtrak money that Congress approved last summer.  You can see the list of projects here . If you look at the projects in the list, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] further, WSDOT &#8211; which funds most Cascades service &#8211; is applying for some of the Amtrak money that Congress approved last summer.  You can see the list of projects here . If you look at the projects in the list, [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seattle Transit Blog &#187; Biden: Good Pick For Rail</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator>Seattle Transit Blog &#187; Biden: Good Pick For Rail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-7983</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoughts on the Amtrak Funding Bill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] Thoughts on the Amtrak Funding Bill [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serial catowner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4337</link>
		<dc:creator>serial catowner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4337</guid>
		<description>If the Democrats will know their business and play their part, this is a major advance in transportation in this country.  The meltwaters have greased the bedrock and the glacier has lurched forward, but the warming will continue. and a new Congress and President could carry matters forward quickly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The regional and state initiatives will be where the action is.  If we can&#039;t empower the great mass of technically proficient people at the local and state level, we have no check on hare-brained schemes coming from a distant Federal government.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, the Cascades corridor will be a strong contender for instant funding in the next Congress, &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; we are ready locally and regionally to move.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is common for railroads to have more right-of-way than they are using, especially railroads that have single-tracked portions of formerly double-tracked mains.  In Utah passenger service is being initiated on passenger-only trackage installed adjacent to freight rail trackage.  It should be possible to add some passenger-only trackage in Washington that would make the Cascade trains very competitive with air travel.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Irony Alert:  building light rail to the airport makes air travel more competitive.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The passage of this bill with a veto-proof majority marks a major sea-change in our transportation policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If the Democrats will know their business and play their part, this is a major advance in transportation in this country.  The meltwaters have greased the bedrock and the glacier has lurched forward, but the warming will continue. and a new Congress and President could carry matters forward quickly.</p>
<p>The regional and state initiatives will be where the action is.  If we can&#8217;t empower the great mass of technically proficient people at the local and state level, we have no check on hare-brained schemes coming from a distant Federal government.</p>
<p>Yes, the Cascades corridor will be a strong contender for instant funding in the next Congress, <i>if</i> we are ready locally and regionally to move.</p>
<p>It is common for railroads to have more right-of-way than they are using, especially railroads that have single-tracked portions of formerly double-tracked mains.  In Utah passenger service is being initiated on passenger-only trackage installed adjacent to freight rail trackage.  It should be possible to add some passenger-only trackage in Washington that would make the Cascade trains very competitive with air travel.</p>
<p>Irony Alert:  building light rail to the airport makes air travel more competitive.</p>
<p>The passage of this bill with a veto-proof majority marks a major sea-change in our transportation policies.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4335</guid>
		<description>anonymous, the only way Amtrak will get around that is by building their own tracks. In the NE Corridor that&#039;s already the case.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Cascades 20 year plan does include some passenger-only track, and the California project would never wait for freight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
anonymous, the only way Amtrak will get around that is by building their own tracks. In the NE Corridor that&#8217;s already the case.</p>
<p>The Cascades 20 year plan does include some passenger-only track, and the California project would never wait for freight.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4332</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4332</guid>
		<description>I experience Amtrak waiting for freight a lot, could this build provide ways for Amtrak to get around that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I experience Amtrak waiting for freight a lot, could this build provide ways for Amtrak to get around that?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4330</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/06/14/thoughts-on-the-amtrak-funding-bill/#comment-4330</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;d love to see us get some money to add the 110 mph track, I&#039;d actually be happy to lose that money if it turns out we&#039;re losing it because California is building their high-speed rail.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;California has the potential to showcase high-speed rail in this country to a scale beyond what we could do, just because of the sheer number of people in California.  From what I&#039;ve read, it doesn&#039;t seem out of the question that a California high-speed rail could turn an operating profit, which would be fantastic for high-speed rail around the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
While I&#8217;d love to see us get some money to add the 110 mph track, I&#8217;d actually be happy to lose that money if it turns out we&#8217;re losing it because California is building their high-speed rail.  </p>
<p>California has the potential to showcase high-speed rail in this country to a scale beyond what we could do, just because of the sheer number of people in California.  From what I&#8217;ve read, it doesn&#8217;t seem out of the question that a California high-speed rail could turn an operating profit, which would be fantastic for high-speed rail around the country.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 241/246 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-13 01:36:11 -->
