<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One mile on rail replaces four miles driving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/07/23/one-mile-on-rail-is-not-the-same-as-a-mile-driving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/07/23/one-mile-on-rail-is-not-the-same-as-a-mile-driving/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/07/23/one-mile-on-rail-is-not-the-same-as-a-mile-driving/#comment-6014</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=927#comment-6014</guid>
		<description>The point is that for every new mile someone travels on transit across the lake, or from the U-district or Northgate to downtown, that will be four car miles removed from the same corridor.

Overall trip percentages are pretty useless. Remember, I-5 only has a few percent of daily trips as well. Looks tiny, but those &quot;few&quot; trips cause huge numbers of hours lost every year. The other trips, the 90%, are trips taken in off hours, on uncongested roads, walking down the street for lunch at work or hitting the grocery store. The commute trips are where this region&#039;s congestion comes from, so that&#039;s what we target with rail.

And in those corridors, I-5 or I-90, rail will be carrying thirty or forty percent of the trips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The point is that for every new mile someone travels on transit across the lake, or from the U-district or Northgate to downtown, that will be four car miles removed from the same corridor.</p>
<p>Overall trip percentages are pretty useless. Remember, I-5 only has a few percent of daily trips as well. Looks tiny, but those &#8220;few&#8221; trips cause huge numbers of hours lost every year. The other trips, the 90%, are trips taken in off hours, on uncongested roads, walking down the street for lunch at work or hitting the grocery store. The commute trips are where this region&#8217;s congestion comes from, so that&#8217;s what we target with rail.</p>
<p>And in those corridors, I-5 or I-90, rail will be carrying thirty or forty percent of the trips.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/07/23/one-mile-on-rail-is-not-the-same-as-a-mile-driving/#comment-6007</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=927#comment-6007</guid>
		<description>So the point is that even if only 10% of trips are on transit, that&#039;s as good as 40% of trips?

I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
So the point is that even if only 10% of trips are on transit, that&#8217;s as good as 40% of trips?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Overhead Wire</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/07/23/one-mile-on-rail-is-not-the-same-as-a-mile-driving/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>The Overhead Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=927#comment-5985</guid>
		<description>Ah I have that book at my office.  I&#039;ll need to look through it again and pull stuff out. Thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Ah I have that book at my office.  I&#8217;ll need to look through it again and pull stuff out. Thanks for the heads up.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 185/190 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-13 04:25:19 -->
