http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/03/i-985-coverage/ Transit in the Greater Seattle Area Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:22:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/03/i-985-coverage/#comment-16332 Watson51 Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:46:46 +0000 http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1237#comment-16332 the WSDOT traffic engineers said that 4 lanes on 520 would just shift the backup from before the bridge to montlake. There isn't enough capacity on 5 to support it, and unless we find another $20 billion in the couch cushions, I-5 isn't going to be changed. And really, it doesn't seem like the best way to spend money.
the WSDOT traffic engineers said that 4 lanes on 520 would just shift the backup from before the bridge to montlake. There isn’t enough capacity on 5 to support it, and unless we find another $20 billion in the couch cushions, I-5 isn’t going to be changed. And really, it doesn’t seem like the best way to spend money.

]]> http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/03/i-985-coverage/#comment-16313 Pete Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:50:42 +0000 http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1237#comment-16313 The P-I article's headline was one word too long. it should simply have said "<b>I-985 can't solve one traffic woe"</b>
The P-I article’s headline was one word too long. it should simply have said “I-985 can’t solve one traffic woe”

]]>