<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Transit Measures + Cali HSR Prop 1A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Cole-Daum</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-18528</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Cole-Daum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-18528</guid>
		<description>The Bart extension to Silicon Valley seemed doomed to fall just short, until now: http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_11007805</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The Bart extension to Silicon Valley seemed doomed to fall just short, until now: <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_11007805" rel="nofollow">http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_11007805</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here Comes Reality &#124; hugeasscity</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-17001</link>
		<dc:creator>Here Comes Reality &#124; hugeasscity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-17001</guid>
		<description>[...] come reports that GM and Ford are &#8220;running on fumes.&#8221; The dots are being connected. All over the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] come reports that GM and Ford are &#8220;running on fumes.&#8221; The dots are being connected. All over the [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16562</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16562</guid>
		<description>It looks oddly like MetroLink&#039;s Prop M was going to buy... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metrostlouis.org/crossroads/metroExpansion.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BRT&lt;/a&gt;.  The measure seems to mostly be a reaction to budget problems, and they&#039;re threatening to remove &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metrostlouis.org/crossroads/metroServiceCuts.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;well over half of their bus service&lt;/a&gt;.  They claim the cause of the budget problem to be that federal startup funds dried up and their state and cities have cut taxes. I&#039;m not sure why they didn&#039;t plan for start-up fund ending, especially considering 67% of their budget goes to drivers (not really what you&#039;d call a start-up cost).

My uninformed outsider opinion: &quot;let&#039;s fix our system that&#039;s failing due to too many bus drivers by adding more buses!&quot; didn&#039;t win many hearts and minds.  If they have good ridership they should have just asked to tax to make up for the budget.  If they don&#039;t, then maybe cutting empty buses isn&#039;t a terrible idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It looks oddly like MetroLink&#8217;s Prop M was going to buy&#8230; <a href="http://www.metrostlouis.org/crossroads/metroExpansion.asp" rel="nofollow">BRT</a>.  The measure seems to mostly be a reaction to budget problems, and they&#8217;re threatening to remove <a href="http://www.metrostlouis.org/crossroads/metroServiceCuts.asp" rel="nofollow">well over half of their bus service</a>.  They claim the cause of the budget problem to be that federal startup funds dried up and their state and cities have cut taxes. I&#8217;m not sure why they didn&#8217;t plan for start-up fund ending, especially considering 67% of their budget goes to drivers (not really what you&#8217;d call a start-up cost).</p>
<p>My uninformed outsider opinion: &#8220;let&#8217;s fix our system that&#8217;s failing due to too many bus drivers by adding more buses!&#8221; didn&#8217;t win many hearts and minds.  If they have good ridership they should have just asked to tax to make up for the budget.  If they don&#8217;t, then maybe cutting empty buses isn&#8217;t a terrible idea.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16534</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16534</guid>
		<description>Yes. We&#039;ll be talking about that soon. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yes. We&#8217;ll be talking about that soon. :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trayton</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16523</link>
		<dc:creator>Trayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16523</guid>
		<description>I was born in St. Louis, so I&#039;m sad to see Proposition M fail.  I checked out the website http://www.moremetrolink.com/ and it&#039;s a travesty of support.  I never found exactly what would be added by passing Prop M.  Coming up 4% short is disheartening after seeing the supporters&#039; website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I was born in St. Louis, so I&#8217;m sad to see Proposition M fail.  I checked out the website <a href="http://www.moremetrolink.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.moremetrolink.com/</a> and it&#8217;s a travesty of support.  I never found exactly what would be added by passing Prop M.  Coming up 4% short is disheartening after seeing the supporters&#8217; website.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16429</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16429</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe it. I really thought, after losing the monorail and last year&#039;s measure, that this would fail too. So many naysayers. I am so happy it passed... now, is there any way to get it finished sooner? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I cannot believe it. I really thought, after losing the monorail and last year&#8217;s measure, that this would fail too. So many naysayers. I am so happy it passed&#8230; now, is there any way to get it finished sooner? :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16428</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16428</guid>
		<description>Light rail getting a yes; I-985 is going down

-Lindbloom&#039;s piece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Light rail getting a yes; I-985 is going down</p>
<p>-Lindbloom&#8217;s piece<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16425</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16425</guid>
		<description>12:49AM

Now it&#039;s official!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
12:49AM</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s official!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16422</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16422</guid>
		<description>I hope high speed rail passes. If that gets built, we&#039;ll see a new era of transportation in the united states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I hope high speed rail passes. If that gets built, we&#8217;ll see a new era of transportation in the united states.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16421</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16421</guid>
		<description>Here are results for transit measures in our northern neighboring counties.

Skagit County Public Transportation Benefit Area Proposition No. 1
Completed Precincts: 0 of 94
Vote Count	 Percentage
Yes	15,712	51.4%
No	14,832	48.6%

PTBA (Community Transit) ANNEXATION (Maltby, Clearview area)
43/43	100.00%
 	Vote Count	Percent
APPROVED	3,326	44.51%
REJECTED	4,146	55.49%
Total	7,472	100.00%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Here are results for transit measures in our northern neighboring counties.</p>
<p>Skagit County Public Transportation Benefit Area Proposition No. 1<br />
Completed Precincts: 0 of 94<br />
Vote Count	 Percentage<br />
Yes	15,712	51.4%<br />
No	14,832	48.6%</p>
<p>PTBA (Community Transit) ANNEXATION (Maltby, Clearview area)<br />
43/43	100.00%<br />
 	Vote Count	Percent<br />
APPROVED	3,326	44.51%<br />
REJECTED	4,146	55.49%<br />
Total	7,472	100.00%<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/04/us-transit-measures-cali-hsr-prop-1a/#comment-16410</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1245#comment-16410</guid>
		<description>Honolulu is good

Kansas City, erm... yeah, no comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Honolulu is good</p>
<p>Kansas City, erm&#8230; yeah, no comment.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 298/302 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-23 22:50:56 -->
