<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Municipal League to Metro: Control Costs, End 40-40-20</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/24/municipal-league-to-metro-control-costs-end-40-40-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/24/municipal-league-to-metro-control-costs-end-40-40-20/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/24/municipal-league-to-metro-control-costs-end-40-40-20/#comment-19643</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1317#comment-19643</guid>
		<description>It woudn&#039;t reduce service, 40-40-20 is about &lt;b&gt;new&lt;/b&gt; service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It woudn&#8217;t reduce service, 40-40-20 is about <b>new</b> service.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runnerodb83</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/11/24/municipal-league-to-metro-control-costs-end-40-40-20/#comment-19639</link>
		<dc:creator>runnerodb83</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1317#comment-19639</guid>
		<description>Regarding the 40-40-20 mandate, that could be difficult to repeal in today&#039;s economic climate as it could reduce service to less dense areas which may be the only areas some folks can afford to live.  Also, if it were reduced in some newly developed mixed income areas where transit is not fully utilized it could bring forward an outcry from civil right leaders claiming that the mandate will &quot;push out&quot; the lower income residents by not providing adequate connections for families without the means to own a vehicle or two.

My 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Regarding the 40-40-20 mandate, that could be difficult to repeal in today&#8217;s economic climate as it could reduce service to less dense areas which may be the only areas some folks can afford to live.  Also, if it were reduced in some newly developed mixed income areas where transit is not fully utilized it could bring forward an outcry from civil right leaders claiming that the mandate will &#8220;push out&#8221; the lower income residents by not providing adequate connections for families without the means to own a vehicle or two.</p>
<p>My 2 cents<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 171/176 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-13 04:29:10 -->
