<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Transit Lanes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21307</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21307</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never been convinced that making third exclusively transit was the way to go. I&#039;d much rather see first and third converted to one-ways (pair 1st with 2nd and 3rd with 4th). Then put a single dedicated transit only lane on EACH one of the four street, rather than 4 transit only lanes one street.

The advantage is that it spreads the buses out so they don&#039;t trip on each other, but it also spreads the people waiting for the bus out. It&#039;s virtually impossible to walk down the sidewalk at rush hour on 3rd because everybody is standing there. That actually harms street-front businesses. Not only can&#039;t people park on 3rd like they can on other streets (off peak), but people can&#039;t even walk there.

And then I hate to be the one to bring it up, but a sizable portion of transit riders are not the kind of people you want lingering in large groups outside your storefront.

Haven&#039;t we learned yet that single purpose streets don&#039;t work? The best street, from an urban design perspective blends all the modes on a single street. Give each a separate ROW, but put them on the same street if you want good urban synergy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;ve never been convinced that making third exclusively transit was the way to go. I&#8217;d much rather see first and third converted to one-ways (pair 1st with 2nd and 3rd with 4th). Then put a single dedicated transit only lane on EACH one of the four street, rather than 4 transit only lanes one street.</p>
<p>The advantage is that it spreads the buses out so they don&#8217;t trip on each other, but it also spreads the people waiting for the bus out. It&#8217;s virtually impossible to walk down the sidewalk at rush hour on 3rd because everybody is standing there. That actually harms street-front businesses. Not only can&#8217;t people park on 3rd like they can on other streets (off peak), but people can&#8217;t even walk there.</p>
<p>And then I hate to be the one to bring it up, but a sizable portion of transit riders are not the kind of people you want lingering in large groups outside your storefront.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t we learned yet that single purpose streets don&#8217;t work? The best street, from an urban design perspective blends all the modes on a single street. Give each a separate ROW, but put them on the same street if you want good urban synergy.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21286</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21286</guid>
		<description>The only thing I would be worried about with this is possibly it becoming a little bit less safe, especially at times with few buses. I really wish they would put retail into some of those buildings along third with blank walls facing the streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The only thing I would be worried about with this is possibly it becoming a little bit less safe, especially at times with few buses. I really wish they would put retail into some of those buildings along third with blank walls facing the streets.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21281</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21281</guid>
		<description>There are also garage entrances North of Stewart, IIRC the plan calls for extending the bus-only zone to Virgina or Lenora. I believe the Post Office has a garage entrance on Third as well though I believe this is limited to official vehicles. I don&#039;t think there are any other remaining garage entrances on Third, just loading docks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
There are also garage entrances North of Stewart, IIRC the plan calls for extending the bus-only zone to Virgina or Lenora. I believe the Post Office has a garage entrance on Third as well though I believe this is limited to official vehicles. I don&#8217;t think there are any other remaining garage entrances on Third, just loading docks.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21270</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21270</guid>
		<description>there was one at Stewart i believe, but they turned the bottom floor of the garage into a sporting goods store and moved the entrances to other streets.  did they know 3rd ave bus only was coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
there was one at Stewart i believe, but they turned the bottom floor of the garage into a sporting goods store and moved the entrances to other streets.  did they know 3rd ave bus only was coming?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>are there any garage entrances on 3rd ave that might mess with a bus-only route?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
are there any garage entrances on 3rd ave that might mess with a bus-only route?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21259</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21259</guid>
		<description>If transit/single auto flow is changed, esp. with a reduction in capacity/lanes on a viaduct which will no longer be in existence as it is currently, yes, a dedicated transit thoroughfare will be needed. Have you taken a bus on 3rd Ave lately?  It&#039;s jam-packed with buses during rush hour.  Imagine that all day long.  That&#039;s what will happen.  No, don&#039;t take away a lane, keep it four.  As a bicyclist, I also use 3rd occasionally and it&#039;s much safer for me to use a center lane to avoid buses in the right lane as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If transit/single auto flow is changed, esp. with a reduction in capacity/lanes on a viaduct which will no longer be in existence as it is currently, yes, a dedicated transit thoroughfare will be needed. Have you taken a bus on 3rd Ave lately?  It&#8217;s jam-packed with buses during rush hour.  Imagine that all day long.  That&#8217;s what will happen.  No, don&#8217;t take away a lane, keep it four.  As a bicyclist, I also use 3rd occasionally and it&#8217;s much safer for me to use a center lane to avoid buses in the right lane as well.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tres_arboles</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21254</link>
		<dc:creator>tres_arboles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21254</guid>
		<description>I was gonna say it and then, luckily, re-read the post and you got it:  bike lanes in the transit mall, please.  Would somebody remind Mr. Vesley at the Seattle Times that cyclists have already been taxed for ST2 so there won&#039;t be any need for a bike license ;-) to pay for them!

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I was gonna say it and then, luckily, re-read the post and you got it:  bike lanes in the transit mall, please.  Would somebody remind Mr. Vesley at the Seattle Times that cyclists have already been taxed for ST2 so there won&#8217;t be any need for a bike license ;-) to pay for them!</p>
<p>David<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21245</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21245</guid>
		<description>Well, even though most downtown and near-downtown residents aren&#039;t interested in the &quot;beats driving&quot; aspect, speed when you can get it is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Well, even though most downtown and near-downtown residents aren&#8217;t interested in the &#8220;beats driving&#8221; aspect, speed when you can get it is good.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21242</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21242</guid>
		<description>Why would keeping 3rd avenue as all day transit make any sense. The volumes off-peak are negligible. Buses don&#039;t have much problme getting through downtown off-peak, with the one exception of the pike-pine corridor on weekends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Why would keeping 3rd avenue as all day transit make any sense. The volumes off-peak are negligible. Buses don&#8217;t have much problme getting through downtown off-peak, with the one exception of the pike-pine corridor on weekends.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Bundridge</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2008/12/12/more-transit-lanes/#comment-21241</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bundridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=1355#comment-21241</guid>
		<description>Martin,

Stand on 3rd @ University then ask yourself that question again =)

Yes, all 4 lanes are needed there - The last thing I want is to be on the bus when another bus pulls out and plows in front of our bus which just about happens anyways with the 4 lanes but killing off one lane for a center lane would be asking for multiple injury accidents, daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Martin,</p>
<p>Stand on 3rd @ University then ask yourself that question again =)</p>
<p>Yes, all 4 lanes are needed there &#8211; The last thing I want is to be on the bus when another bus pulls out and plows in front of our bus which just about happens anyways with the 4 lanes but killing off one lane for a center lane would be asking for multiple injury accidents, daily.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 284/288 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-24 09:25:46 -->
