<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Stimulus List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:27:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31933</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31933</guid>
		<description>Actually I believe there is a way to dump the sub-area equity but it requires a super majority of the board. Which is highly unlikely due to the way board representation is spread out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Actually I believe there is a way to dump the sub-area equity but it requires a super majority of the board. Which is highly unlikely due to the way board representation is spread out.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31907</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31907</guid>
		<description>Very true that we need the rail and freeway connections (both Seattle and Tacoma) as our nations freight system is dependent on both and the connections between ship, train and truck. In fact we can add the airport to the mix as well for both business travel and air cargo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Very true that we need the rail and freeway connections (both Seattle and Tacoma) as our nations freight system is dependent on both and the connections between ship, train and truck. In fact we can add the airport to the mix as well for both business travel and air cargo.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31898</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31898</guid>
		<description>Can we just agree that it&#039;s complicated? Taxes come from everywhere in differing amounts and are spent everywhere in differing amounts. People drive on roads close to home and far from home. Half the state population lives on relatively more expensive Puget Sound, half lives in the more spread out rest of the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Can we just agree that it&#8217;s complicated? Taxes come from everywhere in differing amounts and are spent everywhere in differing amounts. People drive on roads close to home and far from home. Half the state population lives on relatively more expensive Puget Sound, half lives in the more spread out rest of the state.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31892</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31892</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rephrase Bernie&#039;s comment as &quot;without the BNSF and UP lines Seattle wouldn&#039;t have a port&quot; - the freeways alone aren&#039;t sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;d rephrase Bernie&#8217;s comment as &#8220;without the BNSF and UP lines Seattle wouldn&#8217;t have a port&#8221; &#8211; the freeways alone aren&#8217;t sufficient.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Whittome</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31365</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whittome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31365</guid>
		<description>Yes that was the explanation that WSDOT gave me but driving past Issaquah is made all the more treacherous as a result of poor lane stripping and no sunken cats eyes such as we have in England</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yes that was the explanation that WSDOT gave me but driving past Issaquah is made all the more treacherous as a result of poor lane stripping and no sunken cats eyes such as we have in England<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31360</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31360</guid>
		<description>I can only assume the legislature picked projects that weren&#039;t likely to come out of one of the other buckets of money. There are still the funds the PSRC gets to distribute for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I can only assume the legislature picked projects that weren&#8217;t likely to come out of one of the other buckets of money. There are still the funds the PSRC gets to distribute for instance.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31359</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31359</guid>
		<description>I agree on the signs. Road signage could be much better.

On the other hand I suspect the reason there are no cat-eyes past Issaquah has to do with the need to plow Snoqualmie pass. The Tiger Mountain area is where you start seeing frequent snow on I-90. Raised reflectors would just get broken off by the plow every time it passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I agree on the signs. Road signage could be much better.</p>
<p>On the other hand I suspect the reason there are no cat-eyes past Issaquah has to do with the need to plow Snoqualmie pass. The Tiger Mountain area is where you start seeing frequent snow on I-90. Raised reflectors would just get broken off by the plow every time it passed.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31357</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31357</guid>
		<description>Even better would be to apply the sales tax to gas. One nice thing is the money could be spent on non-road uses like sidewalks, streetlights, bike paths, and transit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Even better would be to apply the sales tax to gas. One nice thing is the money could be spent on non-road uses like sidewalks, streetlights, bike paths, and transit.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31356</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31356</guid>
		<description>The timber sales money goes to local school districts, community and technical colleges, Central Washington University, Eastern Washington University, The Evergreen State College, The University of Washington, Washington State University, and Western Washington University. As well as the various branch campuses.

Yes the UW does get construction money from timber sales, but the revenue from the University Tract is far more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The timber sales money goes to local school districts, community and technical colleges, Central Washington University, Eastern Washington University, The Evergreen State College, The University of Washington, Washington State University, and Western Washington University. As well as the various branch campuses.</p>
<p>Yes the UW does get construction money from timber sales, but the revenue from the University Tract is far more important.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31352</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31352</guid>
		<description>Amen, brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Amen, brother!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31351</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31351</guid>
		<description>Subarea equity is required by law. There has been no abandonment of it, nor can there be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Subarea equity is required by law. There has been no abandonment of it, nor can there be.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31350</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31350</guid>
		<description>Spokane and tri-cities, too, which makes it look like olympia is spending it&#039;ss $330 mn in the places the other $160 mn won&#039;t get spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Spokane and tri-cities, too, which makes it look like olympia is spending it&#8217;ss $330 mn in the places the other $160 mn won&#8217;t get spent.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31349</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31349</guid>
		<description>Sounds made up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Sounds made up.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31346</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31346</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the rest seem like goofy projects that aren&#039;t even that important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yeah, the rest seem like goofy projects that aren&#8217;t even that important.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Whittome</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31330</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whittome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31330</guid>
		<description>If I was to turn my attention to roads, I would add better signage to all of our freeways in the Seattle area so that destinations along the roadways are better shown.  For example - and I know this is federal highway policy - but when I get on the I-90 in Seattle and go eastbound, I would like a sign showing not me but those perhaps unfamiliar to the area - that there are a few intermediate towns between Seattle and Spokane that you can get to along the I-90.  Bellevue and Issaquah spring to mind.  There is not one sign showing drivers in the Seattle area that you can reach Issaquah along the I-90 corridor (or Bellevue for that matter either)

I&#039;d also like to see way better signage for SeaTac Airport.  The only sign in the City of Seattle that I have ever seen for the airport is a bike lane path in Pioneer Square district.  I believe we should make it much clearer as one joins the I-5 in downtown Seattle that the airport can be found by going southbound in &#039;x&#039; number of miles.  There is also NOT ONE sign for SeaTac Airport anywhere on the I-90 - appropriate signs would be before the I-405 interchange both on the 405 and on the 90 or before the interchange with the I-5 south.  By way of contrast, in England, Heathrow Airport is signed from every motorway pouring into London and from 50 miles away on all the major motorways.  So too is Gatwick Airport a less busy airport than SeaTac I believe.

The other road improvements I would like to see are more use of British style cats eyes in the freeway lanes (there are none east of Issaquah making the I-90 a dark slab of laneless black in the wintertime)and an attempt at least to introduce different colored on and off ramp side reflectors - again such as we have in England.

End of my soap box, but it is a huge pet peeve for me both of the above points

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If I was to turn my attention to roads, I would add better signage to all of our freeways in the Seattle area so that destinations along the roadways are better shown.  For example &#8211; and I know this is federal highway policy &#8211; but when I get on the I-90 in Seattle and go eastbound, I would like a sign showing not me but those perhaps unfamiliar to the area &#8211; that there are a few intermediate towns between Seattle and Spokane that you can get to along the I-90.  Bellevue and Issaquah spring to mind.  There is not one sign showing drivers in the Seattle area that you can reach Issaquah along the I-90 corridor (or Bellevue for that matter either)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to see way better signage for SeaTac Airport.  The only sign in the City of Seattle that I have ever seen for the airport is a bike lane path in Pioneer Square district.  I believe we should make it much clearer as one joins the I-5 in downtown Seattle that the airport can be found by going southbound in &#8216;x&#8217; number of miles.  There is also NOT ONE sign for SeaTac Airport anywhere on the I-90 &#8211; appropriate signs would be before the I-405 interchange both on the 405 and on the 90 or before the interchange with the I-5 south.  By way of contrast, in England, Heathrow Airport is signed from every motorway pouring into London and from 50 miles away on all the major motorways.  So too is Gatwick Airport a less busy airport than SeaTac I believe.</p>
<p>The other road improvements I would like to see are more use of British style cats eyes in the freeway lanes (there are none east of Issaquah making the I-90 a dark slab of laneless black in the wintertime)and an attempt at least to introduce different colored on and off ramp side reflectors &#8211; again such as we have in England.</p>
<p>End of my soap box, but it is a huge pet peeve for me both of the above points</p>
<p>Tim<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Whittome</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whittome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31327</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s stupid about it?  It is a chance to rennovate a key corridor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
What&#8217;s stupid about it?  It is a chance to rennovate a key corridor<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31324</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31324</guid>
		<description>An overwhelming amount of money is spent on Seattle and King County. When built I-90 was the most expensive roadway per mile ever. It&#039;s still a colossus. State money maintains the 520 floating bridge which is getting to the point tolls may be needed just to seal the cracks. How much is WSDOT spending on the on I-405 corridor over the next ten years vs I-90 from Ellensburg to Spokane? 

Sure money from &quot;road taxes&quot; flows out of King County to the rest of the state but Seattle wouldn&#039;t have a port if it wasn&#039;t for I-90 and I-5. Porportionally the greater Puget Sound area uses State and Federal highways outside the region far more than those outside the region use &quot;our&quot; roads. &quot;Seattle infrastructure&quot; extends way past county lines.

You know the system is reasonably equitable when both sides are screaming foul ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
An overwhelming amount of money is spent on Seattle and King County. When built I-90 was the most expensive roadway per mile ever. It&#8217;s still a colossus. State money maintains the 520 floating bridge which is getting to the point tolls may be needed just to seal the cracks. How much is WSDOT spending on the on I-405 corridor over the next ten years vs I-90 from Ellensburg to Spokane? </p>
<p>Sure money from &#8220;road taxes&#8221; flows out of King County to the rest of the state but Seattle wouldn&#8217;t have a port if it wasn&#8217;t for I-90 and I-5. Porportionally the greater Puget Sound area uses State and Federal highways outside the region far more than those outside the region use &#8220;our&#8221; roads. &#8220;Seattle infrastructure&#8221; extends way past county lines.</p>
<p>You know the system is reasonably equitable when both sides are screaming foul ;-)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rex</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31323</link>
		<dc:creator>rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31323</guid>
		<description>Douglas
Why all the mean, spiteful attack?  This a forum to exchange ideas and share our experiences that could improve our commnunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Douglas<br />
Why all the mean, spiteful attack?  This a forum to exchange ideas and share our experiences that could improve our commnunity.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31319</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31319</guid>
		<description>Do you have any numbers to back this up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Do you have any numbers to back this up?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/02/24/state-stimulus-list/#comment-31318</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3087#comment-31318</guid>
		<description>Great comment, Douglas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Great comment, Douglas.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 423/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-12 20:39:15 -->
