<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Very Quick Overview of Why R8A Matters to You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senator Swecker vs. East Link - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-96860</link>
		<dc:creator>Senator Swecker vs. East Link - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-96860</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve written about this in the past, and I&#8217;ve read a lot more of the history in the meantime. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] We&#8217;ve written about this in the past, and I&#8217;ve read a lot more of the history in the meantime. [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Choice is Surface - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-95081</link>
		<dc:creator>The Conservative Choice is Surface - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-95081</guid>
		<description>[...] I-90 bridge is feasible using existing technology. We could be hearing: &#8220;I don&#8217;t like the R8A project and won&#8217;t raise a finger to support [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] I-90 bridge is feasible using existing technology. We could be hearing: &#8220;I don&#8217;t like the R8A project and won&#8217;t raise a finger to support [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cross-Lake Battle That Already Ended - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-75016</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cross-Lake Battle That Already Ended - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-75016</guid>
		<description>[...] capacity from new HOV lanes in each direction. In March, we pointed out that the federal government funded our center lanes expressly to be converted to rail transit. The state has borrowed those lanes for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] capacity from new HOV lanes in each direction. In March, we pointed out that the federal government funded our center lanes expressly to be converted to rail transit. The state has borrowed those lanes for [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do You Need Another Reason? - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-69885</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Need Another Reason? - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-69885</guid>
		<description>[...] of course, is front and center in the fight against building light rail on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] of course, is front and center in the fight against building light rail on [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The I-90 Fight Continues, And The State Is Losing - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-58784</link>
		<dc:creator>The I-90 Fight Continues, And The State Is Losing - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-58784</guid>
		<description>[...] to Bellevue and Overlake is planned to replace the current I-90 express lanes. Those express lanes were built after a 1976 Memorandum of Agreement signed by several parties, including the state of Washington, to reserve them for transit. They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] to Bellevue and Overlake is planned to replace the current I-90 express lanes. Those express lanes were built after a 1976 Memorandum of Agreement signed by several parties, including the state of Washington, to reserve them for transit. They [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Go To Seattle Transit Blog And Get Angry &#124; hugeasscity</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-37147</link>
		<dc:creator>Go To Seattle Transit Blog And Get Angry &#124; hugeasscity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-37147</guid>
		<description>[...] East Link across the bridge.  The STB crew is doing their job on this one:  start here, or go here for the background.  And have some hard liquor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] East Link across the bridge.  The STB crew is doing their job on this one:  start here, or go here for the background.  And have some hard liquor [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pressure Mounts on R8A, State Transit Support - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-37119</link>
		<dc:creator>Pressure Mounts on R8A, State Transit Support - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-37119</guid>
		<description>[...] John Jensen  The Seattle PI (again, and again) and the Times have today written more coverage about R8A funding controversy that has only gotten worse in the last few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] John Jensen  The Seattle PI (again, and again) and the Times have today written more coverage about R8A funding controversy that has only gotten worse in the last few [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clibborn (and Chopp) vs. East Link - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-37107</link>
		<dc:creator>Clibborn (and Chopp) vs. East Link - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-37107</guid>
		<description>[...] since Sound Transit chose Interstate 90 as the preferred alignment for East Link light rail, a concerted effort to &#8220;protect&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] since Sound Transit chose Interstate 90 as the preferred alignment for East Link light rail, a concerted effort to &#8220;protect&#8221; [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Further delays for East Link in House transportation budget - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36836</link>
		<dc:creator>Further delays for East Link in House transportation budget - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36836</guid>
		<description>[...] their 2009 budget proposal (press release here). Not surprisingly, it includes more delays for R8A, the project that would reconfigure I-90 HOV lanes to make room for East Link Light Rail: (17) The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] their 2009 budget proposal (press release here). Not surprisingly, it includes more delays for R8A, the project that would reconfigure I-90 HOV lanes to make room for East Link Light Rail: (17) The [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Responsible Transportation Forum &#187; Wa State Transportation Project List R8A -Missing Funding for ST2 East Link</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36367</link>
		<dc:creator>Responsible Transportation Forum &#187; Wa State Transportation Project List R8A -Missing Funding for ST2 East Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36367</guid>
		<description>[...] R8A, the I-90 HOV lane project that MUST be complete for East Link to be built, is completely missing. This blocks a $4.5 billion investment that we’ve already funded. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] R8A, the I-90 HOV lane project that MUST be complete for East Link to be built, is completely missing. This blocks a $4.5 billion investment that we’ve already funded. [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legislature Blocks East Link - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36193</link>
		<dc:creator>Legislature Blocks East Link - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36193</guid>
		<description>[...] R8A, the I-90 HOV lane project that MUST be complete for East Link to be built, is completely missing. This blocks a $4.5 billion investment that we&#8217;ve already funded. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] R8A, the I-90 HOV lane project that MUST be complete for East Link to be built, is completely missing. This blocks a $4.5 billion investment that we&#8217;ve already funded. [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36166</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36166</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m &quot;way over the top&quot; (Hi John and Martin), I get to defend myself.

I recognize that sometimes people have particular things they want to see happen, and they see other things as a threat to that. I was just trying to figure out why I saw a huge difference between earlier comments and these comments, and now I think that&#039;s clear.

We&#039;re all single issue voters sometimes. I certainly am. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If I&#8217;m &#8220;way over the top&#8221; (Hi John and Martin), I get to defend myself.</p>
<p>I recognize that sometimes people have particular things they want to see happen, and they see other things as a threat to that. I was just trying to figure out why I saw a huge difference between earlier comments and these comments, and now I think that&#8217;s clear.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re all single issue voters sometimes. I certainly am. :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36165</guid>
		<description>Some background on those technology choices, too:
http://www.soundtransit.org/x3014.xml

Check out the first two docs under &quot;Additional I-90 Studies&quot; at the end. This has been studied every time someone wanted to block it, since the 1960s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Some background on those technology choices, too:<br />
<a href="http://www.soundtransit.org/x3014.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.soundtransit.org/x3014.xml</a></p>
<p>Check out the first two docs under &#8220;Additional I-90 Studies&#8221; at the end. This has been studied every time someone wanted to block it, since the 1960s.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36164</guid>
		<description>Initiatives are an exception. This wasn&#039;t an initiative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Initiatives are an exception. This wasn&#8217;t an initiative.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publicola &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Well, Follow the Money&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36146</link>
		<dc:creator>Publicola &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Well, Follow the Money&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36146</guid>
		<description>[...] side link. The House transportation budget will do the same thing. Seattle Transit Blog has been watching this story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] side link. The House transportation budget will do the same thing. Seattle Transit Blog has been watching this story [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36135</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36135</guid>
		<description>In the case of Rep. Clibborn I believe there are 3 things going on:
1. Wanting to keep the special access Mercer Island has to the I-90 bridge even at the cost of East Link.
2. A desire to revisit the transit technology choices made by ST. I&#039;m not sure if this is a general opposition to rail or is simply an extension of #1.
3. Olympia has a giant sucking hole in the budget. Cutting things you aren&#039;t in favor of in the first place is one of the easier choices to make.

Now &gt; 50% of the voters in her district did vote for Prop. 1. But it would seem the ones with the most influence over her actions don&#039;t want to lose HOV lane access and don&#039;t want tolls on I-90. At least in certain transportation matters it would seem she has a very parochial view which is unfortunate given the committee she chairs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
In the case of Rep. Clibborn I believe there are 3 things going on:<br />
1. Wanting to keep the special access Mercer Island has to the I-90 bridge even at the cost of East Link.<br />
2. A desire to revisit the transit technology choices made by ST. I&#8217;m not sure if this is a general opposition to rail or is simply an extension of #1.<br />
3. Olympia has a giant sucking hole in the budget. Cutting things you aren&#8217;t in favor of in the first place is one of the easier choices to make.</p>
<p>Now &gt; 50% of the voters in her district did vote for Prop. 1. But it would seem the ones with the most influence over her actions don&#8217;t want to lose HOV lane access and don&#8217;t want tolls on I-90. At least in certain transportation matters it would seem she has a very parochial view which is unfortunate given the committee she chairs.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36129</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36129</guid>
		<description>While I think it is important to have as many of the state and local elected officials in the ST district to have a positive or at worst neutral view of ST. It shouldn&#039;t be to the extent that ST is forced to do something very different than what they told the voters they would do.

Ben&#039;s right, the FTA isn&#039;t going to give a flying fig what some state legislators might say. They are much more focused on the nuts and bolts of the proposal. Other than increasing risk or cost there is little a minority of legislators are going to be able to do to sway the FTA.

Besides anyone who really wants to try to take on Sound Transit is likely to run smack into two local political forces of nature in the form of Sen. Murray and Snohomish County Executive Aaron Reardon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
While I think it is important to have as many of the state and local elected officials in the ST district to have a positive or at worst neutral view of ST. It shouldn&#8217;t be to the extent that ST is forced to do something very different than what they told the voters they would do.</p>
<p>Ben&#8217;s right, the FTA isn&#8217;t going to give a flying fig what some state legislators might say. They are much more focused on the nuts and bolts of the proposal. Other than increasing risk or cost there is little a minority of legislators are going to be able to do to sway the FTA.</p>
<p>Besides anyone who really wants to try to take on Sound Transit is likely to run smack into two local political forces of nature in the form of Sen. Murray and Snohomish County Executive Aaron Reardon.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36128</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36128</guid>
		<description>[deleted, topic over]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[deleted, topic over]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36127</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36127</guid>
		<description>[deleted, topic over]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[deleted, topic over]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H. Duke</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/24/a-very-quick-overview-of-why-r8a-matters-to-you/#comment-36123</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H. Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3318#comment-36123</guid>
		<description>Ben,

&quot;voters approved&quot; != &quot;public good&quot;

Exhibit A: Tim Eyman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Ben,</p>
<p>&#8220;voters approved&#8221; != &#8220;public good&#8221;</p>
<p>Exhibit A: Tim Eyman<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 424/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-25 01:55:32 -->
