<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Link Free Ride to Affect Just 2,600 Daily Tunnel Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anandakos</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-44877</link>
		<dc:creator>Anandakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-44877</guid>
		<description>This is a letter I sent to main@soundtransit.org just now.  It has many of the same points discussed in the thread, but maybe with a little different point of view.  

--------------------------------------------

After all these years, with irrefutable evidence that &quot;all door access&quot; in the Ride Free Area saves millions of dollars annually in operating costs, the pinchpennies are at it again.  

Since the Link trains will be stopping at the same platforms in the DSTT as do the buses and will follow them through the bored sections between the stations, they will be operating at the same speed as do the buses.  There is no information I can find on the web identifying which routes stop at which bays in the tunnel (a SERIOUS oversight), but one can assume that you are smart enough to have the trains stop at the &quot;front&quot; bays so they can move out in front of any buses which might be delayed for wheelchair loading.  

However, since the trains are limited to the guideway, if a bus passing through the tunnel in the previous pulse stopping at the &quot;back&quot; bays has been delayed long enough for a wheelchair at a station, the train will have to stop in the bored sections to allow it to clear the path.  So there will be no fully reliable higher level of service for the rail vehicles than the buses that remain.  For the person traveling from University Street to the ID/Chinatown station for an Asian lunch, the elapsed time will normally be exactly the same.  Yet one type of vehicle will charge $1.75 for the trip while the other will be free.  That is stupid.  

If you have aggressive fare inspection you will alienate your riders by embarrassing them on the platforms, and if you don&#039;t you will net very little revenue.  

It seems to me that an agency as smart as yours could not make such an egregious error were it not that you are setting the stage for removal of the Ride Free service from the tunnel buses.  

The penny pinchers always win in the end, don&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
This is a letter I sent to <a href="mailto:main@soundtransit.org">main@soundtransit.org</a> just now.  It has many of the same points discussed in the thread, but maybe with a little different point of view.  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>After all these years, with irrefutable evidence that &#8220;all door access&#8221; in the Ride Free Area saves millions of dollars annually in operating costs, the pinchpennies are at it again.  </p>
<p>Since the Link trains will be stopping at the same platforms in the DSTT as do the buses and will follow them through the bored sections between the stations, they will be operating at the same speed as do the buses.  There is no information I can find on the web identifying which routes stop at which bays in the tunnel (a SERIOUS oversight), but one can assume that you are smart enough to have the trains stop at the &#8220;front&#8221; bays so they can move out in front of any buses which might be delayed for wheelchair loading.  </p>
<p>However, since the trains are limited to the guideway, if a bus passing through the tunnel in the previous pulse stopping at the &#8220;back&#8221; bays has been delayed long enough for a wheelchair at a station, the train will have to stop in the bored sections to allow it to clear the path.  So there will be no fully reliable higher level of service for the rail vehicles than the buses that remain.  For the person traveling from University Street to the ID/Chinatown station for an Asian lunch, the elapsed time will normally be exactly the same.  Yet one type of vehicle will charge $1.75 for the trip while the other will be free.  That is stupid.  </p>
<p>If you have aggressive fare inspection you will alienate your riders by embarrassing them on the platforms, and if you don&#8217;t you will net very little revenue.  </p>
<p>It seems to me that an agency as smart as yours could not make such an egregious error were it not that you are setting the stage for removal of the Ride Free service from the tunnel buses.  </p>
<p>The penny pinchers always win in the end, don&#8217;t they?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36571</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36571</guid>
		<description>I agree with your general comment about the costs?  

Perhaps it has to do with the enforcement?  They&#039;re worried about making it &quot;Ride Free but you need to have a ticket or ORCA card indicating that you got on in the Ride Free Area so everyone who tries to sneak onto Link without paying can&#039;t just claim that they only got in on Ride Free,&quot; I guess.  And I guess there could be an issue with transfers being somewhat complicated, as if you only rode in the Ride Free Area you wouldn&#039;t have transfer credit.  It doesn&#039;t seem that difficult, though.

They must be assuming that a significant percentage of people love rail so much that they&#039;re going to ride the train instead of the bus.  After all, isn&#039;t that part of the justification for Link anyway, since it&#039;s not going to be much faster than the 194 for getting to the airport?  (Shorter head times between cars, yes, faster transit time once moving, not as much.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I agree with your general comment about the costs?  </p>
<p>Perhaps it has to do with the enforcement?  They&#8217;re worried about making it &#8220;Ride Free but you need to have a ticket or ORCA card indicating that you got on in the Ride Free Area so everyone who tries to sneak onto Link without paying can&#8217;t just claim that they only got in on Ride Free,&#8221; I guess.  And I guess there could be an issue with transfers being somewhat complicated, as if you only rode in the Ride Free Area you wouldn&#8217;t have transfer credit.  It doesn&#8217;t seem that difficult, though.</p>
<p>They must be assuming that a significant percentage of people love rail so much that they&#8217;re going to ride the train instead of the bus.  After all, isn&#8217;t that part of the justification for Link anyway, since it&#8217;s not going to be much faster than the 194 for getting to the airport?  (Shorter head times between cars, yes, faster transit time once moving, not as much.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36570</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36570</guid>
		<description>The cash rider is going to have enough problems with transferring from Link to a bus.  No ORCA means no transfer credit, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The cash rider is going to have enough problems with transferring from Link to a bus.  No ORCA means no transfer credit, right?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36510</guid>
		<description>[deleted, homeless policy is off-topic]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[deleted, homeless policy is off-topic]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36502</guid>
		<description>I know that this is not possible right now with budget problems and all that, but, I like what San Diego does. They have a full time police force that only handles transit. They patrol buses and the Trolly. (the San Diego trolly is in my opinion the best mass transit system in America.) Also San Diego has a system where you but a ticket that is good on trolly and bus. It is either good for time or distance. So basically the father you go the more you pay on the trolly. The Transit Police check the tickets and make sure that you are using a valid ticket. In not they can cite or arrest you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I know that this is not possible right now with budget problems and all that, but, I like what San Diego does. They have a full time police force that only handles transit. They patrol buses and the Trolly. (the San Diego trolly is in my opinion the best mass transit system in America.) Also San Diego has a system where you but a ticket that is good on trolly and bus. It is either good for time or distance. So basically the father you go the more you pay on the trolly. The Transit Police check the tickets and make sure that you are using a valid ticket. In not they can cite or arrest you.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36490</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36490</guid>
		<description>Then  they can take the bus, or if they want to pay and avoid the urine smell, the train.  Link involves going way down into a tunnel station.  Unless one is travelling from Westlake to ID or v.v., it is hardly worth the climb down to the tunnel versus riding a free surface bus.

Again, rail is not free in Downtown Seattle.  99 Waterfront Streetcar never was.  And if the Sounder ever opens a stop at Pier 70, it will not be free for travel from King Street either.

My &quot;hate&quot; for the &quot;homeless&quot; is based on many many years of urban living, &#039;cause guess what: they usually aren&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Then  they can take the bus, or if they want to pay and avoid the urine smell, the train.  Link involves going way down into a tunnel station.  Unless one is travelling from Westlake to ID or v.v., it is hardly worth the climb down to the tunnel versus riding a free surface bus.</p>
<p>Again, rail is not free in Downtown Seattle.  99 Waterfront Streetcar never was.  And if the Sounder ever opens a stop at Pier 70, it will not be free for travel from King Street either.</p>
<p>My &#8220;hate&#8221; for the &#8220;homeless&#8221; is based on many many years of urban living, &#8217;cause guess what: they usually aren&#8217;t.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36450</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36450</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure the 550 is operated by KCM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;m pretty sure the 550 is operated by KCM.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lloyd</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36408</link>
		<dc:creator>lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36408</guid>
		<description>Since the 550 is operated by ST as opposed to KCM, will it cost to ride on it in the DSTT as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Since the 550 is operated by ST as opposed to KCM, will it cost to ride on it in the DSTT as well?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36381</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36381</guid>
		<description>Those that rely on the RFA are mostly office workers looking to expand their lunch options or get to meetings faster.  This helps retail and the lubricates business.  Your hate for the homeless is not relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Those that rely on the RFA are mostly office workers looking to expand their lunch options or get to meetings faster.  This helps retail and the lubricates business.  Your hate for the homeless is not relevant.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36380</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36380</guid>
		<description>Anything to keep the Bums and Transients off of the trains, I say!

Besides, will there really be any effective Fare Inspection in the tunnel?  Most people who want to ride for free between Westlake and the ID will get away with it.  Just post some signage so the tourists don&#039;t get miffed; Bus is Free, train is not.  Heck, the 99 Waterfront Benson Street Car (remember that?) was not free even though all of its service was once inside the RFA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Anything to keep the Bums and Transients off of the trains, I say!</p>
<p>Besides, will there really be any effective Fare Inspection in the tunnel?  Most people who want to ride for free between Westlake and the ID will get away with it.  Just post some signage so the tourists don&#8217;t get miffed; Bus is Free, train is not.  Heck, the 99 Waterfront Benson Street Car (remember that?) was not free even though all of its service was once inside the RFA.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36378</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36378</guid>
		<description>I think ST is counting on the heavy presence of fare inspectors on Link to discourage the idiots and freeloaders.

I don&#039;t know what Sound Transit&#039;s agreements for security and police response to Link are. Hopefully it is somewhat better than what Metro operators have to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I think ST is counting on the heavy presence of fare inspectors on Link to discourage the idiots and freeloaders.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what Sound Transit&#8217;s agreements for security and police response to Link are. Hopefully it is somewhat better than what Metro operators have to deal with.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36358</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36358</guid>
		<description>According to the Seattle PI article, Sound Transit is loosing $2mil if they do not collect in the RFA and will have to make it up with a higher fare on the streets. The RFA option would be $2 base fare. While the No RFA option will be $1.75 base fare.

Many of the bus drivers are opposed to the RFA anyway. 

Another option being considered will do away with the RFA in the DSTT altogether. In my opinion, buses collecting fares in the tunnel will be the real slowing factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
According to the Seattle PI article, Sound Transit is loosing $2mil if they do not collect in the RFA and will have to make it up with a higher fare on the streets. The RFA option would be $2 base fare. While the No RFA option will be $1.75 base fare.</p>
<p>Many of the bus drivers are opposed to the RFA anyway. </p>
<p>Another option being considered will do away with the RFA in the DSTT altogether. In my opinion, buses collecting fares in the tunnel will be the real slowing factor.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36338</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36338</guid>
		<description>Good luck getting rid of such deadbeats without arming the bus drivers.  They&#039;ll just use a different excuse, or none at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Good luck getting rid of such deadbeats without arming the bus drivers.  They&#8217;ll just use a different excuse, or none at all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36337</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36337</guid>
		<description>&quot;The downside is that everyone else has to pay a quarter just so 2.6k people can get a free ride&quot;

I just don&#039;t believe that.  It has to be spin meant to create a false choice that led to this decision.  Let&#039;s run the numbers:

If 2,600/day is less than 10% of ridership, then the rest of the ridership is at least 23,400 people.  Take a quarter and multiply it by two trips a day per person, and that&#039;s $42,700,000 a year.  What Greg Walker and yourself are claiming is that letting 10% of the riders ride a short trip in the tunnel costs an extra $42.7M a year in janitorial costs?  Even at $50,000 a year, that&#039;s a full-time staff of 85 janitors for this 10% alone.  That means the entire janitorial staff is 850 people!  I had no idea Seattlites were so messy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
&#8220;The downside is that everyone else has to pay a quarter just so 2.6k people can get a free ride&#8221;</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t believe that.  It has to be spin meant to create a false choice that led to this decision.  Let&#8217;s run the numbers:</p>
<p>If 2,600/day is less than 10% of ridership, then the rest of the ridership is at least 23,400 people.  Take a quarter and multiply it by two trips a day per person, and that&#8217;s $42,700,000 a year.  What Greg Walker and yourself are claiming is that letting 10% of the riders ride a short trip in the tunnel costs an extra $42.7M a year in janitorial costs?  Even at $50,000 a year, that&#8217;s a full-time staff of 85 janitors for this 10% alone.  That means the entire janitorial staff is 850 people!  I had no idea Seattlites were so messy.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36295</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36295</guid>
		<description>It has been my experience that most people know where the ride free zone ends. They just do not want to pay. Most people who claim that they thought they were still in the ride free zone that are pressed by the driver will pay. Espically if the driver closes the door before they can get out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It has been my experience that most people know where the ride free zone ends. They just do not want to pay. Most people who claim that they thought they were still in the ride free zone that are pressed by the driver will pay. Espically if the driver closes the door before they can get out.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36292</guid>
		<description>If they were on a 49 the other day they&#039;d have no one to blame but themselves.  The operator called out several landmarks and after each one he called out &quot;Last stop in the ride free area&quot; (saying that several times).  Some just want a free ride</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If they were on a 49 the other day they&#8217;d have no one to blame but themselves.  The operator called out several landmarks and after each one he called out &#8220;Last stop in the ride free area&#8221; (saying that several times).  Some just want a free ride<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36291</guid>
		<description>This is going to be ultra confusing to the cash rider</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
This is going to be ultra confusing to the cash rider<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew"RennDawg"Renner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36284</guid>
		<description>If nothing else, This will get rid of the deadbeats that ride mass transit. You know, the ones who say they thought they were still in the ride free zone but are lying. They just do not want to pay. I&#039;ve seen people say they thought they were still in the ride free zone when leaving the bus in tukwila, kent even federal way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If nothing else, This will get rid of the deadbeats that ride mass transit. You know, the ones who say they thought they were still in the ride free zone but are lying. They just do not want to pay. I&#8217;ve seen people say they thought they were still in the ride free zone when leaving the bus in tukwila, kent even federal way.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36261</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36261</guid>
		<description>The downside is that everyone else has to pay a quarter just so 2.6k people can get a free ride. Those people already have the option of getting free rides on buses without affecting Sound Transit&#039;s bottom line. It is pretty confusing having one mode free in the tunnel and the other not, I agree.

Personally, I would eliminate fares in the tunnel once Orca is adopted and start to increase cash fares vs. Orca, and spend the saved money on additional bus service in the city. But I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s totally the right thing to do.

The vast majority of riders in the tunnel are going to have transfers or passes, or are leaving downtown, though, so it shouldn&#039;t affect them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The downside is that everyone else has to pay a quarter just so 2.6k people can get a free ride. Those people already have the option of getting free rides on buses without affecting Sound Transit&#8217;s bottom line. It is pretty confusing having one mode free in the tunnel and the other not, I agree.</p>
<p>Personally, I would eliminate fares in the tunnel once Orca is adopted and start to increase cash fares vs. Orca, and spend the saved money on additional bus service in the city. But I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s totally the right thing to do.</p>
<p>The vast majority of riders in the tunnel are going to have transfers or passes, or are leaving downtown, though, so it shouldn&#8217;t affect them.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Skehan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/25/no-free-ride-to-affect-just-2600-daily-tunnel-users/#comment-36259</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Skehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3813#comment-36259</guid>
		<description>BTW, its been a couple of years since I checked, but the DSA, not Seattle, pays Metro for the RFA.  It had not gone up in many years, and was only about $90,000 per year at that - no where near what it cost Metro to shuttle all the freebies around town.  
Of course the flip of that arguement is that it makes the buses faster, and more efficient(which is true), so there&#039;s a cost saving for Metro in that.

Does anyone know the current reimbursment to Metro from the DSA?
Then the question has to raised, who will pick up the tab for all the riders that choose a free bus, rather than pay $1.75 to ride the train.  
Maybe ST should pay for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
BTW, its been a couple of years since I checked, but the DSA, not Seattle, pays Metro for the RFA.  It had not gone up in many years, and was only about $90,000 per year at that &#8211; no where near what it cost Metro to shuttle all the freebies around town.<br />
Of course the flip of that arguement is that it makes the buses faster, and more efficient(which is true), so there&#8217;s a cost saving for Metro in that.</p>
<p>Does anyone know the current reimbursment to Metro from the DSA?<br />
Then the question has to raised, who will pick up the tab for all the riders that choose a free bus, rather than pay $1.75 to ride the train.<br />
Maybe ST should pay for that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 423/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-13 04:27:14 -->
