<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take Action: Mail Legislators About Light Rail to Bellevue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:16:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: House Funds R8A, Sets Stage for East Link Negotiations - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-38835</link>
		<dc:creator>House Funds R8A, Sets Stage for East Link Negotiations - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-38835</guid>
		<description>[...] Funds R8A, Sets Stage for East Link Negotiations by John Jensen  Earlier this month we asked readers to reach out to legislators to make sure that Link light rail to the Eastside was able to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Funds R8A, Sets Stage for East Link Negotiations by John Jensen  Earlier this month we asked readers to reach out to legislators to make sure that Link light rail to the Eastside was able to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EcoStreets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week in Buses</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37686</link>
		<dc:creator>EcoStreets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week in Buses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37686</guid>
		<description>[...] In other news&#8230; The Urban Blog has a great post up about the conniving Seattle legislature slowing down construction of a light rail system in Puget Sound. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In other news&#8230; The Urban Blog has a great post up about the conniving Seattle legislature slowing down construction of a light rail system in Puget Sound. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37592</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37592</guid>
		<description>I found a statement from Sound Transit about R8A on Strange Bedfellows:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/165435.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/165435.asp&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a statement from Sound Transit about R8A on Strange Bedfellows:<br />
<a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/165435.asp" rel="nofollow">http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/archives/165435.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37590</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37590</guid>
		<description>To at least some &quot;value&quot; means pulling a backdoor raid on Sound Transit&#039;s funds to pay for other road projects. See Rep. Chopp&#039;s bright idea about charging Sound Transit anywhere from one to two billion for use of the center roadway. Someone should probably tell him that the Federal government will want about 90% of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To at least some &#8220;value&#8221; means pulling a backdoor raid on Sound Transit&#8217;s funds to pay for other road projects. See Rep. Chopp&#8217;s bright idea about charging Sound Transit anywhere from one to two billion for use of the center roadway. Someone should probably tell him that the Federal government will want about 90% of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37558</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37558</guid>
		<description>R8A does not do anything to change the center roadway. Nothing, it will still be reversible lanes. The final engineering and construction for the addtional HOV lanes on the outer roadway is all part of the WSDOT project. The engineering and construction phases for each stage are all spelled out.

R8A adds HOV lanes to the outer roadway. PERIOD. How does Sound Transit picking up 2/3rds of the cost equate to financial malfeasance or actually following through with promised funding undermine credibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R8A does not do anything to change the center roadway. Nothing, it will still be reversible lanes. The final engineering and construction for the addtional HOV lanes on the outer roadway is all part of the WSDOT project. The engineering and construction phases for each stage are all spelled out.</p>
<p>R8A adds HOV lanes to the outer roadway. PERIOD. How does Sound Transit picking up 2/3rds of the cost equate to financial malfeasance or actually following through with promised funding undermine credibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Tooley</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37547</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Tooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37547</guid>
		<description>Proceeding on the bridge conversion without fully spec&#039;d engineering is financial malfeasance and undermines the credibility of Sound Transit as a public organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proceeding on the bridge conversion without fully spec&#8217;d engineering is financial malfeasance and undermines the credibility of Sound Transit as a public organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJStroky</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37440</link>
		<dc:creator>DJStroky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37440</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering how the term &quot;value&quot; is defined.  To whom is it a value to?  FHWA?  Our Region?  Is it a value of regional mobility?  It sure seems that it would be valuable to build light rail here instead of HOV lanes as it would dramatically increase the transportation capacity of the corridor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering how the term &#8220;value&#8221; is defined.  To whom is it a value to?  FHWA?  Our Region?  Is it a value of regional mobility?  It sure seems that it would be valuable to build light rail here instead of HOV lanes as it would dramatically increase the transportation capacity of the corridor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37419</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37419</guid>
		<description>This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/I90/TwoWayTransit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;schedule is in accordance with what WSDOT has on there website&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soundtransit.org/x1282.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;consistent with what ST has been saying&lt;/a&gt;. Note on the ST website,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Due to funding limitations the project will be implemented in stages.  Each stage of the project provides viable and independent transit and transportation benefits that can be funded and constructed as financing becomes available. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
From what I see reading the latest amended house transportation budget there is only $4.6M allocated to design (stages 2 and 3) and construction for stage 2 [page 47, section (27]. Half a million of that is earmarked for study of rail feasibility. The real question is will there be enough money to keep on schedule for the next two years? I don&#039;t know if anybody really knows that for sure [((and $4,908,000)), $2,611,000 makes it appear there was a $2.3M cut]. One thing is for sure and that is that studying rail is a complete waste if there isn&#039;t sufficient funding to complete R8A.

Now is not the time to be doing yet another feasibility study ** . Now is the time to pour concrete while construction bids are coming in 20-30% below engineering estimates. R8A has value even if the center roadway isn&#039;t converted to rail. The only thing that really matters at this point is the final engineering of the rail on the bridge. This is completely on ST&#039;s nickel. If the legislature wants to come back in 3-4 years and commission a design review by WSDOT of the plans that might make sense. Until then, just build the damn road!

** It&#039;s hard to know if the $550,000 in the budget is money already spent on the studies that have been done. There are a number of items in the bill (like stage 1) which are already complete. Making this more confusing is that in the LEAP document referenced it appears there is no funding for R8A at all. Any certified bean counters in the house? I sure can&#039;t find the $10M in this biennium Rep. Clibborn speaks of in the above comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/I90/TwoWayTransit" rel="nofollow">schedule is in accordance with what WSDOT has on there website</a> and <a href="http://www.soundtransit.org/x1282.xml" rel="nofollow">consistent with what ST has been saying</a>. Note on the ST website,</p>
<blockquote><p>
Due to funding limitations the project will be implemented in stages.  Each stage of the project provides viable and independent transit and transportation benefits that can be funded and constructed as financing becomes available.
</p></blockquote>
<p>From what I see reading the latest amended house transportation budget there is only $4.6M allocated to design (stages 2 and 3) and construction for stage 2 [page 47, section (27]. Half a million of that is earmarked for study of rail feasibility. The real question is will there be enough money to keep on schedule for the next two years? I don&#8217;t know if anybody really knows that for sure [((and $4,908,000)), $2,611,000 makes it appear there was a $2.3M cut]. One thing is for sure and that is that studying rail is a complete waste if there isn&#8217;t sufficient funding to complete R8A.</p>
<p>Now is not the time to be doing yet another feasibility study ** . Now is the time to pour concrete while construction bids are coming in 20-30% below engineering estimates. R8A has value even if the center roadway isn&#8217;t converted to rail. The only thing that really matters at this point is the final engineering of the rail on the bridge. This is completely on ST&#8217;s nickel. If the legislature wants to come back in 3-4 years and commission a design review by WSDOT of the plans that might make sense. Until then, just build the damn road!</p>
<p>** It&#8217;s hard to know if the $550,000 in the budget is money already spent on the studies that have been done. There are a number of items in the bill (like stage 1) which are already complete. Making this more confusing is that in the LEAP document referenced it appears there is no funding for R8A at all. Any certified bean counters in the house? I sure can&#8217;t find the $10M in this biennium Rep. Clibborn speaks of in the above comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Leber</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37393</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Leber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37393</guid>
		<description>I received the same response.  Can anybody explain to me why this will take until 2014?  Stage 1 took about 2 years to complete in a booming economy.  It seems like there would be plenty of engineering and construction resources around now to get stages 2 &amp; 3 done in less time and either hit the budget or go under budget...

Am I missing something here or is she simply committing to a 2014 completion date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received the same response.  Can anybody explain to me why this will take until 2014?  Stage 1 took about 2 years to complete in a booming economy.  It seems like there would be plenty of engineering and construction resources around now to get stages 2 &amp; 3 done in less time and either hit the budget or go under budget&#8230;</p>
<p>Am I missing something here or is she simply committing to a 2014 completion date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37386</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37386</guid>
		<description>Well it is good that she responded, however given her track record pardon me if I&#039;m a bit skeptical of her real commitment to R8A or allowing Sound Transit to use the center roadway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it is good that she responded, however given her track record pardon me if I&#8217;m a bit skeptical of her real commitment to R8A or allowing Sound Transit to use the center roadway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37382</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37382</guid>
		<description>Response from Clibborn:

&quot;The R8A ramp will be built by 2014 and my budget includes $10 million this biennium for preliminary engineering that&#039;s needed to meet the 2014 completion date.   We also need to ascertain the value of the center lanes that Sound Transit will take over.   This bridge was built with federal funds, and the federal government requires us to get a fair value for these lanes.  Some have suggested the lanes are not worth any money, while others have suggested they&#039;re worth $2.8 billion. It&#039;s going to be somewhere in between, and I think the answer will be much closer to the lower end of the range.  The study will give us the answer to this question.  Once we know the value of the center lanes, we will be able to negotiate a final agreement to turn them over to Sound Transit to put light rail across the I-90 bridge.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response from Clibborn:</p>
<p>&#8220;The R8A ramp will be built by 2014 and my budget includes $10 million this biennium for preliminary engineering that&#8217;s needed to meet the 2014 completion date.   We also need to ascertain the value of the center lanes that Sound Transit will take over.   This bridge was built with federal funds, and the federal government requires us to get a fair value for these lanes.  Some have suggested the lanes are not worth any money, while others have suggested they&#8217;re worth $2.8 billion. It&#8217;s going to be somewhere in between, and I think the answer will be much closer to the lower end of the range.  The study will give us the answer to this question.  Once we know the value of the center lanes, we will be able to negotiate a final agreement to turn them over to Sound Transit to put light rail across the I-90 bridge.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37372</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37372</guid>
		<description>WADOT and Sound Transit still need to negotiate the terms for East Link&#039;s use of the Center Roadway. What will the lease rate be? What liability and maintenance costs will Sound Transit assume, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WADOT and Sound Transit still need to negotiate the terms for East Link&#8217;s use of the Center Roadway. What will the lease rate be? What liability and maintenance costs will Sound Transit assume, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37371</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37371</guid>
		<description>R8A completion is certainly required for East Link to get done. There are other issues that need to be resolved for sure but in Sound Transits construction schedule R8A is a gating issue to stay on schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R8A completion is certainly required for East Link to get done. There are other issues that need to be resolved for sure but in Sound Transits construction schedule R8A is a gating issue to stay on schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Carson</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37367</guid>
		<description>Bernie, so I&#039;m clear on this issue, R8A is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for getting East Link done?

-Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernie, so I&#8217;m clear on this issue, R8A is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for getting East Link done?</p>
<p>-Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37357</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37357</guid>
		<description>The airspace rights negotiation is needless delay too. R8A needs to happen even if East Link never gets built. In fact it needs to happen before 520 can be redone or we&#039;re in for some serious gridlock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The airspace rights negotiation is needless delay too. R8A needs to happen even if East Link never gets built. In fact it needs to happen before 520 can be redone or we&#8217;re in for some serious gridlock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Carson</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37351</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37351</guid>
		<description>Just had an email exchange with Senator Kohl-Welles.  She noted that the budget amendment from yesterday in the Senate, and explained that the Senate budget does in fact fund the Regional Mobility Grant program, but that R8A funding is delayed under the Senate budget waiting on the airspace rights negotiation, as well as the &quot;asset assessment.&quot;

I pushed back on the assessment as needless delay, but I think overall Senator Kohl-Welles is with us on this.

-Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had an email exchange with Senator Kohl-Welles.  She noted that the budget amendment from yesterday in the Senate, and explained that the Senate budget does in fact fund the Regional Mobility Grant program, but that R8A funding is delayed under the Senate budget waiting on the airspace rights negotiation, as well as the &#8220;asset assessment.&#8221;</p>
<p>I pushed back on the assessment as needless delay, but I think overall Senator Kohl-Welles is with us on this.</p>
<p>-Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Still Need to Take Action! - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37303</link>
		<dc:creator>We Still Need to Take Action! - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37303</guid>
		<description>[...] Still Need to Take Action! by John Jensen  Have you contacted your legislators yet? Without a small, $30 million change in the coming state budget, light rail to Bellevue will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Still Need to Take Action! by John Jensen  Have you contacted your legislators yet? Without a small, $30 million change in the coming state budget, light rail to Bellevue will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senator Jarrett Gives Us a Contrived Story - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37298</link>
		<dc:creator>Senator Jarrett Gives Us a Contrived Story - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37298</guid>
		<description>[...] else, somewhere else, a long time ago, for the active attack on Sound Transit we&#8217;ve seen this week. We give credit to the Senator for introducing an amendment to allows WSDOT and Sound Transit to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else, somewhere else, a long time ago, for the active attack on Sound Transit we&#8217;ve seen this week. We give credit to the Senator for introducing an amendment to allows WSDOT and Sound Transit to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rep. Reuven Carlyle</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37279</link>
		<dc:creator>Rep. Reuven Carlyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37279</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the call to my office today, Ryan. 

Hey folks, 

Keep your emails and calls to legislators coming and don&#039;t let up!!  It&#039;s very important that you stay engaged in this process as the sausage-making of the next few days and week(s) moves forward.  A group of hard-core, pro-transit legislators is doing all we can but you&#039;re the juice that keeps us rocking as we try and find a solution among the various parties.  

Your partner in service, 

Reuven Carlyle 
State Representative 
36th Legislative District--the heart, soul, passion and spirit of Seattle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the call to my office today, Ryan. </p>
<p>Hey folks, </p>
<p>Keep your emails and calls to legislators coming and don&#8217;t let up!!  It&#8217;s very important that you stay engaged in this process as the sausage-making of the next few days and week(s) moves forward.  A group of hard-core, pro-transit legislators is doing all we can but you&#8217;re the juice that keeps us rocking as we try and find a solution among the various parties.  </p>
<p>Your partner in service, </p>
<p>Reuven Carlyle<br />
State Representative<br />
36th Legislative District&#8211;the heart, soul, passion and spirit of Seattle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/01/take-action-mail-legislators-about-light-rail-to-bellevue/#comment-37236</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=3950#comment-37236</guid>
		<description>Good idea! I went ahead and did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea! I went ahead and did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
