<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Round Up: HSR, BRT, TVMs and Streetcars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:25:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EvergreenRailfan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40302</link>
		<dc:creator>EvergreenRailfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40302</guid>
		<description>If it were not for all the off-wire streetcar ideas being proprietary, I would say D.C. would make a good laboratory for testing all off-wire vehicles. The old system in D.C. used a conduit line with a collector on the Capitol Hill area, even the PCCs DC Transit used had this system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were not for all the off-wire streetcar ideas being proprietary, I would say D.C. would make a good laboratory for testing all off-wire vehicles. The old system in D.C. used a conduit line with a collector on the Capitol Hill area, even the PCCs DC Transit used had this system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvergreenRailfan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40301</link>
		<dc:creator>EvergreenRailfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40301</guid>
		<description>One of the ideas for bringing back the 50 would have had it using the grade seperated crossing at Atlantic St./Edgar Martinez Way, getting it pretty close to Downtown anyway. I was one of the people who said it was a good idea to bring this route back in the survey. Every other route-realignment survey I suggested the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the ideas for bringing back the 50 would have had it using the grade seperated crossing at Atlantic St./Edgar Martinez Way, getting it pretty close to Downtown anyway. I was one of the people who said it was a good idea to bring this route back in the survey. Every other route-realignment survey I suggested the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40258</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40258</guid>
		<description>Argh. I did too. And they are blaming it on Southeast Seattle people who complained that they would lose service ont he #39 to make way for the #50. Well, this Southeast Seattle person would rather see more crosstown buses. The 39 riders would still have been able to get between downtown and the VA with a transfer at the busway, IIRC, which is not a huge slowdown, but having to go downtown to get to West Seattle from SE Seattle is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh. I did too. And they are blaming it on Southeast Seattle people who complained that they would lose service ont he #39 to make way for the #50. Well, this Southeast Seattle person would rather see more crosstown buses. The 39 riders would still have been able to get between downtown and the VA with a transfer at the busway, IIRC, which is not a huge slowdown, but having to go downtown to get to West Seattle from SE Seattle is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40254</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40254</guid>
		<description>A lot of these corridors are quite dense, and so BRT in the long run won&#039;t have enough capacity, and it will probably be switched to streetcars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of these corridors are quite dense, and so BRT in the long run won&#8217;t have enough capacity, and it will probably be switched to streetcars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvergreenRailfan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40236</link>
		<dc:creator>EvergreenRailfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40236</guid>
		<description>As for DC BRT vs. Streetcars, some routes will work good for streetcars, plus it could be a great lab for future off-wire equipment tests, as there is a prohibition on overhead wires near the Capitol. Both Streetcars and BRT will work great for feeding the big MetroRail system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for DC BRT vs. Streetcars, some routes will work good for streetcars, plus it could be a great lab for future off-wire equipment tests, as there is a prohibition on overhead wires near the Capitol. Both Streetcars and BRT will work great for feeding the big MetroRail system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvergreenRailfan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40235</link>
		<dc:creator>EvergreenRailfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40235</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this is on-topic or not, but here are the latest proposals for the bus route adjustments one LINK starts running, and looks like the restoration of West Seattle-Columbia City service is not on the list, despite being in both planning rounds. I know I voted for it in the consultation. 

http://metro.kingcounty.gov/up/sc/plans/2009/042009-sesea.html#background</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this is on-topic or not, but here are the latest proposals for the bus route adjustments one LINK starts running, and looks like the restoration of West Seattle-Columbia City service is not on the list, despite being in both planning rounds. I know I voted for it in the consultation. </p>
<p><a href="http://metro.kingcounty.gov/up/sc/plans/2009/042009-sesea.html#background" rel="nofollow">http://metro.kingcounty.gov/up/sc/plans/2009/042009-sesea.html#background</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40227</guid>
		<description>To answer the inevitable--no the TVMs don&#039;t do anything (yet).  I was in the tunnel on Wednesday and the ones I passed had dark screens.  I didn&#039;t stop to play with them as I was late already (took an extra 20 minutes getting down Eastlake and into the tunnel).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer the inevitable&#8211;no the TVMs don&#8217;t do anything (yet).  I was in the tunnel on Wednesday and the ones I passed had dark screens.  I didn&#8217;t stop to play with them as I was late already (took an extra 20 minutes getting down Eastlake and into the tunnel).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RK</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40223</link>
		<dc:creator>RK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40223</guid>
		<description>Will this ensure that the Pt. Defiance bypass will be built on schedule, or is that still being held up by the City of Tacoma?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this ensure that the Pt. Defiance bypass will be built on schedule, or is that still being held up by the City of Tacoma?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serial catowner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40207</link>
		<dc:creator>serial catowner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40207</guid>
		<description>Well, excuse me for asking, but how does this relate to recent news that the DOT shut down the office coordinating DOT-Amtrak-BNSF improvements to the Cascade Corridor?

I&#039;m having a hard time squaring this particular circle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, excuse me for asking, but how does this relate to recent news that the DOT shut down the office coordinating DOT-Amtrak-BNSF improvements to the Cascade Corridor?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time squaring this particular circle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Chaddock</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40183</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Chaddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40183</guid>
		<description>very true.  This was just the first planning effort by Amtrak.  Now that they might have a budget for further planning, i expect the new line to make much more sense &amp; avoid duplication (similar to the way CA HSR&#039;s plan changed from what they show).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very true.  This was just the first planning effort by Amtrak.  Now that they might have a budget for further planning, i expect the new line to make much more sense &amp; avoid duplication (similar to the way CA HSR&#8217;s plan changed from what they show).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40171</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40171</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything you said, but the actually track may not reflect the picture shown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything you said, but the actually track may not reflect the picture shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40169</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40169</guid>
		<description>Joint letter from the governors of Washington and Oregon to the Obama administration regarding high speed rail funds:
http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1205&amp;newsType=1
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/News/2009/04/16_railfunding.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joint letter from the governors of Washington and Oregon to the Obama administration regarding high speed rail funds:<br />
<a href="http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1205&amp;newsType=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1205&amp;newsType=1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/News/2009/04/16_railfunding.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/News/2009/04/16_railfunding.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40154</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40154</guid>
		<description>[deleted, off-topic]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[deleted, off-topic]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Chaddock</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40152</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Chaddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40152</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about the alignment of some of the lines (There are parallel lines going across Michigan and Ohio, one ending at Toledo and one ending 60 miles north in Detroit.  Wouldn&#039;t it make sense for both of those lines to follow the same track for most of the run?  Maybe even scrap the Chicago-Detroit line completely in favor of a Chicago-Toledo-Detroit line.  The Chicago-Detroit line is 282 miles.  You only travel an extra 17 miles by going through Toledo, meaning the Chicago-Toledo-Detroit line is almost half as much track (and therefore half as expensive) while only taking 15-20 minutes longer or less.

But, it&#039;s a great first step.  I&#039;m hopeful they can get the SEA-PDX trip under 2 to 2 1/2 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about the alignment of some of the lines (There are parallel lines going across Michigan and Ohio, one ending at Toledo and one ending 60 miles north in Detroit.  Wouldn&#8217;t it make sense for both of those lines to follow the same track for most of the run?  Maybe even scrap the Chicago-Detroit line completely in favor of a Chicago-Toledo-Detroit line.  The Chicago-Detroit line is 282 miles.  You only travel an extra 17 miles by going through Toledo, meaning the Chicago-Toledo-Detroit line is almost half as much track (and therefore half as expensive) while only taking 15-20 minutes longer or less.</p>
<p>But, it&#8217;s a great first step.  I&#8217;m hopeful they can get the SEA-PDX trip under 2 to 2 1/2 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeepc</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/17/news-round-up-hsr-brt-and-streetcars/#comment-40147</link>
		<dc:creator>eeepc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4409#comment-40147</guid>
		<description>Great news about HSR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news about HSR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
