<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympia Update: Transit Does Pretty Well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: County Exec Roundup - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-60000</link>
		<dc:creator>County Exec Roundup - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-60000</guid>
		<description>[...] record of supporting Sound Transit.  Jarrett&#8217;s relationship with East Link in the Senate was more complicated, to say the least.  Hutchison endorsed the Rice/Stanton governance reform proposal, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] record of supporting Sound Transit.  Jarrett&#8217;s relationship with East Link in the Senate was more complicated, to say the least.  Hutchison endorsed the Rice/Stanton governance reform proposal, [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metro to Fund RapidRide with No Net Tax Increase - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-57317</link>
		<dc:creator>Metro to Fund RapidRide with No Net Tax Increase - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-57317</guid>
		<description>[...] announced interim King County Executive Kurt Triplett. Triplett announced plans today to use recent legislative authority to create a transit share of property taxes of 5.5 cents, while cutting other levies to make the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] announced interim King County Executive Kurt Triplett. Triplett announced plans today to use recent legislative authority to create a transit share of property taxes of 5.5 cents, while cutting other levies to make the [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metro Financial Policies - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-53813</link>
		<dc:creator>Metro Financial Policies - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-53813</guid>
		<description>[...] County Councilmember Jane Hague asked for input on using the County&#8217;s new authority to increase property tax by 0.0075% for transit.  Unhelpfully, Seattle Councilmember Jan Drago (1:19:30) is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] County Councilmember Jane Hague asked for input on using the County&#8217;s new authority to increase property tax by 0.0075% for transit.  Unhelpfully, Seattle Councilmember Jan Drago (1:19:30) is [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-42156</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-42156</guid>
		<description>Electrocution is always a bad value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Electrocution is always a bad value.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-42125</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-42125</guid>
		<description>In terms of cost or value or efficiency, is that better than other types of heavy rail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
In terms of cost or value or efficiency, is that better than other types of heavy rail?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-42119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-42119</guid>
		<description>When the bullet pony leaves on a trip, do you avoid telling it to break a leg? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
When the bullet pony leaves on a trip, do you avoid telling it to break a leg? :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-42101</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-42101</guid>
		<description>3rd rail systems are those like NYC subway, BART, DC Metro that run electric cars but do not have overhead wires. Instead they have electric &quot;third rails&quot;.

These rails require complete dedicated ROW because cars or pedestrian who walk on them get electricuted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
3rd rail systems are those like NYC subway, BART, DC Metro that run electric cars but do not have overhead wires. Instead they have electric &#8220;third rails&#8221;.</p>
<p>These rails require complete dedicated ROW because cars or pedestrian who walk on them get electricuted.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hal</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-42099</link>
		<dc:creator>hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-42099</guid>
		<description>What exactly is 3rd rail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
What exactly is 3rd rail?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Skehan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-42085</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Skehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-42085</guid>
		<description>Especially from the ponies perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Especially from the ponies perspective.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-42005</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-42005</guid>
		<description>And you had me itching to make a Bullet Pony lolcat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
And you had me itching to make a Bullet Pony lolcat.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41926</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41926</guid>
		<description>Er, High Speed Pony. HSP sounds better than &quot;Bullet Pony&quot; for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Er, High Speed Pony. HSP sounds better than &#8220;Bullet Pony&#8221; for some reason.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41925</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41925</guid>
		<description>I want a Bullet Pony like they have in Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I want a Bullet Pony like they have in Japan.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Whittome</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41906</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whittome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41906</guid>
		<description>A third train to Vancouver!  Next year!  That would be great, but when are they going to lay on a second train - is that still for the Olympics next year.

The news sounds pretty good on transportation.  Did Mercer Street in Seattle get anything or King Street Station renovation?  I know that the Mayor is confident he has the funds anyway.

It seems like the biggest challenge is getting additional funds for Sounder to make it down to Lakewood.  

I&#039;d like to thank Rep. Clibborn as well as others on the transportation committee who worked hard on keeping things alive.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
A third train to Vancouver!  Next year!  That would be great, but when are they going to lay on a second train &#8211; is that still for the Olympics next year.</p>
<p>The news sounds pretty good on transportation.  Did Mercer Street in Seattle get anything or King Street Station renovation?  I know that the Mayor is confident he has the funds anyway.</p>
<p>It seems like the biggest challenge is getting additional funds for Sounder to make it down to Lakewood.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to thank Rep. Clibborn as well as others on the transportation committee who worked hard on keeping things alive.</p>
<p>Tim<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H. Duke</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41893</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H. Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41893</guid>
		<description>If by &quot;Washington&quot; and &quot;Oregon&quot; you mean &quot;all levels of government in the state&quot;, then I believe you&#039;re right.

If you mean the state government itself, which is what Ben was talking about, than the chart John links to disproves your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If by &#8220;Washington&#8221; and &#8220;Oregon&#8221; you mean &#8220;all levels of government in the state&#8221;, then I believe you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>If you mean the state government itself, which is what Ben was talking about, than the chart John links to disproves your point.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41888</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41888</guid>
		<description>The key for me is how they target their funding. The state, here, doesn&#039;t help much with the larger projects. While they&#039;re willing to expand I-405, they&#039;re not willing to spend that kind of money to expand Link, even though it better meets the state&#039;s long-term goals.

This is like the difference between ten dollars or five dollars when you need a thousand, though - perhaps I shouldn&#039;t have used the state of Oregon as an example.

If we have $2.4B for a viaduct that moves 110,000 a day (and the replacement less), we could be spending that money on transit and getting better long-term bang for our buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The key for me is how they target their funding. The state, here, doesn&#8217;t help much with the larger projects. While they&#8217;re willing to expand I-405, they&#8217;re not willing to spend that kind of money to expand Link, even though it better meets the state&#8217;s long-term goals.</p>
<p>This is like the difference between ten dollars or five dollars when you need a thousand, though &#8211; perhaps I shouldn&#8217;t have used the state of Oregon as an example.</p>
<p>If we have $2.4B for a viaduct that moves 110,000 a day (and the replacement less), we could be spending that money on transit and getting better long-term bang for our buck.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41885</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41885</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This may be hard to believe, but Washington actually funds transit to a much higher degree than Oregon does (or has in the past).&lt;/blockquote&gt;I think per capita they&#039;ve got us beat: http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/04/chart-of-the-day/

It seems our state invests more in small transit agencies than big transit infrastructure, too. As for whether heavy rail is really the end-game... I think that misses the point. I don&#039;t look at light rail as a step toward heavy rail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --></p>
<blockquote><p>This may be hard to believe, but Washington actually funds transit to a much higher degree than Oregon does (or has in the past).</p></blockquote>
<p>I think per capita they&#8217;ve got us beat: <a href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/04/chart-of-the-day/" rel="nofollow">http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/03/04/chart-of-the-day/</a></p>
<p>It seems our state invests more in small transit agencies than big transit infrastructure, too. As for whether heavy rail is really the end-game&#8230; I think that misses the point. I don&#8217;t look at light rail as a step toward heavy rail.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Bradford (Brian)</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41883</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Bradford (Brian)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41883</guid>
		<description>This may be hard to believe, but Washington actually funds transit to a much higher degree than Oregon does (or has in the past).

TriMet has only gotten to where they are because they sacrificed bus service to provide light rail.  And their light rail is cheap compared to Seattle because they haven&#039;t had to build to such a high capacity.

If Seattle at some point were to want to convert to heavy rail (such as New York or Atlanta), the only infrastructure improvements that would need to be made would be an elevated or subsurface path to replace on-street running through the Rainier Valley.  If somebody says &quot;what about 3rd rail&quot; I&#039;ll say that 3rd rail in and of itself does not define heavy rail.  There are systems that fit the heavy rail category that use overhead cantenary.  Boston&#039;s blue line comes to mind.

Much of Portland&#039;s lines would have to be rebuilt, and in fact a limitation of their system is that they can only handle 2 car trains because of the 300ft block size in Portland.

Don&#039;t get me started on the whole Colorado Railcar sillyness.  That is the reason they&#039;re cutting their bus service this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
This may be hard to believe, but Washington actually funds transit to a much higher degree than Oregon does (or has in the past).</p>
<p>TriMet has only gotten to where they are because they sacrificed bus service to provide light rail.  And their light rail is cheap compared to Seattle because they haven&#8217;t had to build to such a high capacity.</p>
<p>If Seattle at some point were to want to convert to heavy rail (such as New York or Atlanta), the only infrastructure improvements that would need to be made would be an elevated or subsurface path to replace on-street running through the Rainier Valley.  If somebody says &#8220;what about 3rd rail&#8221; I&#8217;ll say that 3rd rail in and of itself does not define heavy rail.  There are systems that fit the heavy rail category that use overhead cantenary.  Boston&#8217;s blue line comes to mind.</p>
<p>Much of Portland&#8217;s lines would have to be rebuilt, and in fact a limitation of their system is that they can only handle 2 car trains because of the 300ft block size in Portland.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me started on the whole Colorado Railcar sillyness.  That is the reason they&#8217;re cutting their bus service this year.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41882</guid>
		<description>I wish I could ride a pony, but I wouldn&#039;t mind an hourly Bullet train ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I wish I could ride a pony, but I wouldn&#8217;t mind an hourly Bullet train ;)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Skehan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41879</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Skehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41879</guid>
		<description>I think our Cascade Corridor will fare better than expected when stimulus money starts to flow (OCT09)for HSR projects, even with the reduction to most of the rail office projects delayed in this budget.
So far, announced plans for the 11 corridors nationwide indicate requests will be in the 25-30 Bil. range, for just 8 Bil initially, and 5 Bil, follow up over several years.  That said, WA will need to monitor closely the &#039;match&#039; commitments from other regions, as that will be a realistic requirement for any significant funding.  
I hope WSDOT is keeping better track of this than I am!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I think our Cascade Corridor will fare better than expected when stimulus money starts to flow (OCT09)for HSR projects, even with the reduction to most of the rail office projects delayed in this budget.<br />
So far, announced plans for the 11 corridors nationwide indicate requests will be in the 25-30 Bil. range, for just 8 Bil initially, and 5 Bil, follow up over several years.  That said, WA will need to monitor closely the &#8216;match&#8217; commitments from other regions, as that will be a realistic requirement for any significant funding.<br />
I hope WSDOT is keeping better track of this than I am!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/04/26/olympia-update-transit-does-pretty-well/#comment-41875</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4723#comment-41875</guid>
		<description>How many ponypower? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
How many ponypower? :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 424/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-25 03:52:41 -->
