Comments on: 72 days

By: Bernie

Bernie — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:22:51 +0000

I’m surprised that we’re as close in population now and growing faster (sorry about the formating). The geography is very similar. The big difference is it rains more in SF :-)

Rank in 2007 pop. Metropolitan statistical area Population estimates Change, 2006 to 2007

July 1, 2007 July 1, 2006 Number Percent

12 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 4,203,898 4,164,463 39,435 0.9
13 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 4,179,427 4,046,914 132,513 3.3
14 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 4,081,371 3,994,711 86,660 2.2
15 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 3,309,347 3,262,445 46,902 1.4
16 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 3,208,212 3,172,012 36,200 1.1
17 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 2,974,859 2,948,362 26,497 0.9

By: Nathan

Nathan — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:10:40 +0000

But that requires quad (or at least triple) tracking. That’s just not going to happen along most of this route. I’d love it, but it’s very unlikely.

By: joshuadf

joshuadf — Thu, 07 May 2009 22:54:35 +0000

In many places there are express trains that just don’t stop at most stations. I could imaging an airport express or Tacoma Express someday.

By: Mike Orr

Mike Orr — Thu, 07 May 2009 22:37:16 +0000

Given the 50 years we’ve waited to get even this far, I’d say be happy for the light rail. They did make some good decisions, such as making most of it grade-separated and putting the stations 1-2 miles apart. That will be increasingly important as the system is extended and people go longer distances.

When it reaches capacity, they can build more lines. One on 405 for sure, and perhaps one down the west side through Ballard. There are a lot of people who want to go north-south, but different ones would choose different corridors if they were available.

Unfortunately the number of stops means it will never compete for Seattle-to-Tacoma trips when it gets built to Tacoma, but it will be good traveling to and from south King County. Ideally they would have built express tracks next to the local tracks, but again, considering how it’s been the past 50 years, Link is a big improvement.

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 07 May 2009 20:32:00 +0000

Unfortunately Seattle is building a system that will reach max capacity way before BART will. The too small stations in the DDT guarantee it, as does the surface component along MLK.

One that that San Fransisco did manage to do right was to put back the tourist street cars along the waterfront. They aren’t nearly as nice as our’s but they are up and running.

By: Andrew Smith

Andrew Smith — Thu, 07 May 2009 19:45:24 +0000

I like the beer ads, and I think SF in 1968 was almost as beautiful of SF of 2009.

By: Mickymse

Mickymse — Thu, 07 May 2009 16:56:55 +0000

Well, Seattle does seem to be on that trajectory… which has both its pluses and minuses.

By: AJ

AJ — Thu, 07 May 2009 15:35:56 +0000

It’s strange how similar SF of the late 60s and Seattle of the late 00s look.

Also, the beer ads EVERYWHERE.

By: Erik

Erik — Thu, 07 May 2009 07:51:59 +0000

So do you think those sandhogs and miners got the flu from each other while sitting in the decompression chamber? Did that one guy wash his hands after touching his nose?