<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Costs of Driving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Highway vs. Fixed Transit Debate &#124; SeattleSeattle.com</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-76369</link>
		<dc:creator>The Highway vs. Fixed Transit Debate &#124; SeattleSeattle.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-76369</guid>
		<description>[...] against what it calls &#8220;myths&#8221; of rail transit.  It&#8217;s a long list of points, many of which we&#8217;ve already debunked, but I thought I&#8217;d highlight a few that are relevant to the comparison often being made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] against what it calls &#8220;myths&#8221; of rail transit.  It&#8217;s a long list of points, many of which we&#8217;ve already debunked, but I thought I&#8217;d highlight a few that are relevant to the comparison often being made [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Highway vs. Fixed Transit Debate - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-76293</link>
		<dc:creator>The Highway vs. Fixed Transit Debate - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-76293</guid>
		<description>[...] against what it calls &#8220;myths&#8221; of rail transit.  It&#8217;s a long list of points, many of which we&#8217;ve already debunked, but I thought I&#8217;d highlight a few that are relevant to the comparison often being made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] against what it calls &#8220;myths&#8221; of rail transit.  It&#8217;s a long list of points, many of which we&#8217;ve already debunked, but I thought I&#8217;d highlight a few that are relevant to the comparison often being made [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Costs of Driving - Seattle Transit Blog &#124; Help Aid For Senior Citizen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-72189</link>
		<dc:creator>Costs of Driving - Seattle Transit Blog &#124; Help Aid For Senior Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-72189</guid>
		<description>[...] Another decent blogger put an intriguing blog post on Costs of Driving - Seattle Transit BlogHere&#8217;s a quick excerpta poster here and at, the superb blog run by true crime writers. 10/12- 10/19 (1) 08/17- 08/24 (1) 07/13- 07/20 (1) 07/06- 07/13 (5). MacLean put into words why real-life stories with a particular. But as promised, here&#8217;s a six-pack of questions and answers submitted to me for Harry N. I developed other questions after comparing the cached and current pages. Sunday, January 7th, 2007 But as promised, here&#8217;s a six-pack of questions and answers submitted to me for. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] Another decent blogger put an intriguing blog post on Costs of Driving &#8211; Seattle Transit BlogHere&#8217;s a quick excerpta poster here and at, the superb blog run by true crime writers. 10/12- 10/19 (1) 08/17- 08/24 (1) 07/13- 07/20 (1) 07/06- 07/13 (5). MacLean put into words why real-life stories with a particular. But as promised, here&#8217;s a six-pack of questions and answers submitted to me for Harry N. I developed other questions after comparing the cached and current pages. Sunday, January 7th, 2007 But as promised, here&#8217;s a six-pack of questions and answers submitted to me for. [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Infrastructurist &#124; The Daily Dig</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-50644</link>
		<dc:creator>The Infrastructurist &#124; The Daily Dig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-50644</guid>
		<description>[...] bassist Krist Novoselic remembers tooling around in $100 VW bus back in 1990 &#8212; his account is fun, but it&#8217;s also a case study in how much the cost of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] bassist Krist Novoselic remembers tooling around in $100 VW bus back in 1990 &#8212; his account is fun, but it&#8217;s also a case study in how much the cost of [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Silver: The End of Car Culture - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-44878</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Silver: The End of Car Culture - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-44878</guid>
		<description>[...] at Nate Silver&#8217;s website Five Thirty Eight. This decline caused in part by the rise of the cost of driving, and in part by increased urbanization. It&#8217;s a bit depressing to think that transit agencies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] at Nate Silver&#8217;s website Five Thirty Eight. This decline caused in part by the rise of the cost of driving, and in part by increased urbanization. It&#8217;s a bit depressing to think that transit agencies [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-44213</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-44213</guid>
		<description>Well, even if you are playing on a local team, you might have to play an away game, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Well, even if you are playing on a local team, you might have to play an away game, I suppose.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43970</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43970</guid>
		<description>Santa Cruz County has a very accurate formula to calculate one&#039;s true cost of driving per mile, and it turns out to be in the range of 12,000-18,000 dollars for 10,000-15,000 miles per year.  I wrote a post this formula here: http://21stcenturyurbansolutions.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/the-true-cost-of-driving/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Santa Cruz County has a very accurate formula to calculate one&#8217;s true cost of driving per mile, and it turns out to be in the range of 12,000-18,000 dollars for 10,000-15,000 miles per year.  I wrote a post this formula here: <a href="http://21stcenturyurbansolutions.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/the-true-cost-of-driving/" rel="nofollow">http://21stcenturyurbansolutions.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/the-true-cost-of-driving/</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43949</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43949</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I searched for “Seattle” and it says SOV commuting
declined by 1.5% from 1990-2000.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
From the CIAIII report:

There are five metro areas where drive-alone shares actually declined from 1990, whereas
there were none in the 1980-1990 period. These five were heavily distributed on the West coast. All of the losses were quite small, under one percentage point, with the exception of Seattle with a decline of about 1.5 percentage points. 

So despite Portland&#039;s early investment in rail we kicked their butt :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --></p>
<blockquote><p>I searched for “Seattle” and it says SOV commuting<br />
declined by 1.5% from 1990-2000.</p></blockquote>
<p>From the CIAIII report:</p>
<p>There are five metro areas where drive-alone shares actually declined from 1990, whereas<br />
there were none in the 1980-1990 period. These five were heavily distributed on the West coast. All of the losses were quite small, under one percentage point, with the exception of Seattle with a decline of about 1.5 percentage points. </p>
<p>So despite Portland&#8217;s early investment in rail we kicked their butt :-P<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43946</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43946</guid>
		<description>From the Commuting in America Facts (data is for 1980-2000):
The share of transportation spending of total consumer spending has ranged
between 18% and 19% for 20 years.
The dominant transportation expenditure, 95%, is concerned with the acquisition,
use and upkeep of vehicles.
Vehicle prices have dropped to below the value of 20 weeks average pay, lowest
in about 25 years
Driving Alone remains the lowest in average travel time of the major modes;
Commuter Rail the longest. Average transit travel times remain roughly double
that of driving alone.

The two things that will increase transit use are of course time and money. We saw a jump in transit usage when gas prices spiked. Congestion doesn&#039;t seem to have much of an effect because it still takes longer (twice as long) to use transit so for transit to compete it needs to become faster. The only real way to do this is dedicated ROW or at least some form of congestion management like HOT lanes. I don&#039;t know why commuter rail has the longest average travel time but I have to suspect that it&#039;s because of a high average distance traveled. But, it does point out the need to take direct routes, control the number of stops, offer express service, etc. Time is money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
From the Commuting in America Facts (data is for 1980-2000):<br />
The share of transportation spending of total consumer spending has ranged<br />
between 18% and 19% for 20 years.<br />
The dominant transportation expenditure, 95%, is concerned with the acquisition,<br />
use and upkeep of vehicles.<br />
Vehicle prices have dropped to below the value of 20 weeks average pay, lowest<br />
in about 25 years<br />
Driving Alone remains the lowest in average travel time of the major modes;<br />
Commuter Rail the longest. Average transit travel times remain roughly double<br />
that of driving alone.</p>
<p>The two things that will increase transit use are of course time and money. We saw a jump in transit usage when gas prices spiked. Congestion doesn&#8217;t seem to have much of an effect because it still takes longer (twice as long) to use transit so for transit to compete it needs to become faster. The only real way to do this is dedicated ROW or at least some form of congestion management like HOT lanes. I don&#8217;t know why commuter rail has the longest average travel time but I have to suspect that it&#8217;s because of a high average distance traveled. But, it does point out the need to take direct routes, control the number of stops, offer express service, etc. Time is money.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43927</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43927</guid>
		<description>Gee that sounds fun. After changing a fan belt once I decided I&#039;d stick with computers as my hobby. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Gee that sounds fun. After changing a fan belt once I decided I&#8217;d stick with computers as my hobby. :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43917</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43917</guid>
		<description>That was supposed to be thanks, yes the link works but I see the one I tried to insert didn&#039;t :-(  I&#039;ll do it the simple way this time:

http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/CIAIIIfacts.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
That was supposed to be thanks, yes the link works but I see the one I tried to insert didn&#8217;t :-(  I&#8217;ll do it the simple way this time:</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/CIAIIIfacts.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/CIAIIIfacts.pdf</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43916</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43916</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s, yes the link works. I also found a twelve page summary from the report of &lt;a&gt;Commuting Facts&lt;/a&gt;. Some very interesting and surprising stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
That&#8217;s, yes the link works. I also found a twelve page summary from the report of <a>Commuting Facts</a>. Some very interesting and surprising stuff.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43915</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43915</guid>
		<description>Oil tank? You have a car with a dry sump crankcase? I&#039;ve never seen a car where adding oil wasn&#039;t totally accessible. Drain plugs can be a pain if you don&#039;t have an easy way to get enough clearance to crawl under. Filters can be a royal pain in the ass with some of the early sideways engine cars that were built by adapting older inline designs.

Spark plugs used to be a 12,000 mile interval. They go over 100,000 now. Extended life antifreeze has bumped changes from 50,000 to 100,000. Synthetic engine oil and other lubricants can more than double the time between changes and increase the life of the drivetrain. Distributor less ignitions have replaced points and condensers and the need to manually set timing and dwell. Since the adoption of Onboard Diagnostics a $100 scanner can tell you as much as a commercial grade engine analyzer system used to.

Yeah, I remember balancing dual carbs with a carb stick. That was a pain in the butt and carburetors can never deliver the performance over a wide range of conditions that an electronic fuel injections system with mass air sensor can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Oil tank? You have a car with a dry sump crankcase? I&#8217;ve never seen a car where adding oil wasn&#8217;t totally accessible. Drain plugs can be a pain if you don&#8217;t have an easy way to get enough clearance to crawl under. Filters can be a royal pain in the ass with some of the early sideways engine cars that were built by adapting older inline designs.</p>
<p>Spark plugs used to be a 12,000 mile interval. They go over 100,000 now. Extended life antifreeze has bumped changes from 50,000 to 100,000. Synthetic engine oil and other lubricants can more than double the time between changes and increase the life of the drivetrain. Distributor less ignitions have replaced points and condensers and the need to manually set timing and dwell. Since the adoption of Onboard Diagnostics a $100 scanner can tell you as much as a commercial grade engine analyzer system used to.</p>
<p>Yeah, I remember balancing dual carbs with a carb stick. That was a pain in the butt and carburetors can never deliver the performance over a wide range of conditions that an electronic fuel injections system with mass air sensor can.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43911</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43911</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you man. I think the UD is actually the best place to walk in the city, far ahead of Belltown or First Hill and a some amount ahead of Capitol Hill as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;m with you man. I think the UD is actually the best place to walk in the city, far ahead of Belltown or First Hill and a some amount ahead of Capitol Hill as well.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43910</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43910</guid>
		<description>You know when I was a kid on capitol hill I played soccer on capitol hill.

Why exactly are you talking your kids to Federal Way for soccer when there&#039;s perfectly good soccer in the city? I think you&#039;ve choosen to make things difficult for yourself. I take my daughter to check-ups near Northgate from my house in the U-D, it&#039;s a two block walk to the bus, get on, get off, cross the street, bob&#039;s your uncle. Same way home. I do own two cars, so it&#039;s not like I couldn&#039;t drive if I felt like it.


But anyway, cars on Sunday morning are one thing, driving to Federal Way for work each day is another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
You know when I was a kid on capitol hill I played soccer on capitol hill.</p>
<p>Why exactly are you talking your kids to Federal Way for soccer when there&#8217;s perfectly good soccer in the city? I think you&#8217;ve choosen to make things difficult for yourself. I take my daughter to check-ups near Northgate from my house in the U-D, it&#8217;s a two block walk to the bus, get on, get off, cross the street, bob&#8217;s your uncle. Same way home. I do own two cars, so it&#8217;s not like I couldn&#8217;t drive if I felt like it.</p>
<p>But anyway, cars on Sunday morning are one thing, driving to Federal Way for work each day is another.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43909</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43909</guid>
		<description>I tried to change the oil on one of my cars and I couldn&#039;t get to the oil tank, it was under all kinds of crap.

I have, however, been able to change out the radio in a car, but you know, that&#039;s been easy for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I tried to change the oil on one of my cars and I couldn&#8217;t get to the oil tank, it was under all kinds of crap.</p>
<p>I have, however, been able to change out the radio in a car, but you know, that&#8217;s been easy for a long time.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43908</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43908</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I have two kids (6mo and almost 4yrs). Actually one reason we didn&#039;t want to be totally dependent on a car is the fiasco of crying infants and recalcitrant toddlers! 
Just to cover the bases, another reason we stayed in the U-District is the walkability. As the Congress for the New Urbanism likes to point out, there need to be options for &quot;those who don&#039;t drive – young teenagers, elderly, handicapped, low income people and people who do not seek isolation – empty nesters, singles, hip folks like us.&quot; If I worked in Burien or Federal Way or something we&#039;d want to live somewhere walkable.

You are correct about the Sunday buses, we can&#039;t even get to Seattle Center until the 30 starts running about 10am, though we can get downtown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
FWIW, I have two kids (6mo and almost 4yrs). Actually one reason we didn&#8217;t want to be totally dependent on a car is the fiasco of crying infants and recalcitrant toddlers!<br />
Just to cover the bases, another reason we stayed in the U-District is the walkability. As the Congress for the New Urbanism likes to point out, there need to be options for &#8220;those who don&#8217;t drive – young teenagers, elderly, handicapped, low income people and people who do not seek isolation – empty nesters, singles, hip folks like us.&#8221; If I worked in Burien or Federal Way or something we&#8217;d want to live somewhere walkable.</p>
<p>You are correct about the Sunday buses, we can&#8217;t even get to Seattle Center until the 30 starts running about 10am, though we can get downtown.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43907</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43907</guid>
		<description>It increases the time I spend with my family because it is actually faster than driving! 

The people for whom transit is not convenient are, by &lt;b&gt;definition&lt;/b&gt;, not served by convenient transit. Especially if you have long commutes to far-flung places, it&#039;s difficult to serve that with transit. 

There are places where most people take transit, so you can&#039;t simply pretend that transit si always less convenient, that&#039;s just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It increases the time I spend with my family because it is actually faster than driving! </p>
<p>The people for whom transit is not convenient are, by <b>definition</b>, not served by convenient transit. Especially if you have long commutes to far-flung places, it&#8217;s difficult to serve that with transit. </p>
<p>There are places where most people take transit, so you can&#8217;t simply pretend that transit si always less convenient, that&#8217;s just silly.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43906</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43906</guid>
		<description>Gas was more than $4 a gallon last year, and it&#039;s only because the economy has completely collaspe since that time that prices have fallen so much.

There&#039;s no data to back up the service intervals extension (if actually true)  means that car maintanence is cheaper, in fact, this shows that the cost of at least some maintanence has risen very dramatically:
http://www.motortrend.com/womt/112_9909_tire_inflation/index.html

I could find others but I&#039;m lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Gas was more than $4 a gallon last year, and it&#8217;s only because the economy has completely collaspe since that time that prices have fallen so much.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no data to back up the service intervals extension (if actually true)  means that car maintanence is cheaper, in fact, this shows that the cost of at least some maintanence has risen very dramatically:<br />
<a href="http://www.motortrend.com/womt/112_9909_tire_inflation/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.motortrend.com/womt/112_9909_tire_inflation/index.html</a></p>
<p>I could find others but I&#8217;m lazy.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil on qa</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/05/07/costs-of-driving/#comment-43904</link>
		<dc:creator>phil on qa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=4865#comment-43904</guid>
		<description>Swapping out the electronics today isn&#039;t so hard either and you can buy the tools to do diagnostics for you - www.autotap.com/products.asp

Diagnosing/fixing a carburetor with Vacuum operated emission controls, or balancing a pair of Weber carburetors; now that&#039;s hard work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Swapping out the electronics today isn&#8217;t so hard either and you can buy the tools to do diagnostics for you &#8211; <a href="http://www.autotap.com/products.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.autotap.com/products.asp</a></p>
<p>Diagnosing/fixing a carburetor with Vacuum operated emission controls, or balancing a pair of Weber carburetors; now that&#8217;s hard work!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 423/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-12 18:57:20 -->
