<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle Times Gets Lazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew RennDawg Renner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55541</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew RennDawg Renner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55541</guid>
		<description>All I know is that Sound transit is trying to herd me onto link to bloat there numbers. Getting rid of the 194 makes no sence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
All I know is that Sound transit is trying to herd me onto link to bloat there numbers. Getting rid of the 194 makes no sence.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55517</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55517</guid>
		<description>I saw your Beacon Hill Blog business card in El Quetzal today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I saw your Beacon Hill Blog business card in El Quetzal today.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transfer person</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55484</link>
		<dc:creator>transfer person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55484</guid>
		<description>My dream has always been for a pedestrian tunnel that runs from the waterfront to westlake station.   Maybe with mini trolley cars that people could hop on.  If I was the dictator of Seattle this is what I would install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
My dream has always been for a pedestrian tunnel that runs from the waterfront to westlake station.   Maybe with mini trolley cars that people could hop on.  If I was the dictator of Seattle this is what I would install.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55481</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55481</guid>
		<description>I agree, absolutely. And I have been one of those folks who complained about a one mile walk, in the past. But I had a bit of an epiphany about it last year when I visited London. They talk about an obesity epidemic in Britain -- but in London, the only obese people I noticed were Americans. Everyone walks. Of course, the neighborhoods there have lots of neighborhood services that people need and are about as walkable as you can get, and they have the Tube as well as buses to get around too. But it was normal to walk all over the place. And you didn&#039;t see a lot of fat people, though certainly they do exist there as here.

And then I think about when I was a kid, in Seattle, and I walked 2 miles each way to my school. (I didn&#039;t go to my neighborhood school, which was a block away from home, and didn&#039;t qualify for a school bus. Because my house was on a hill and the school was on a hill too, with a valley in the middle, I got to walk to school uphill both ways, too.)  ;) I was 10. This was not considered all that abnormal for a 10-year-old. But kids now, because of parental fears, don&#039;t get to walk like that. And as adults, so many people just immediately jump in the car -- and as the kids raised by overprotective parents grow up, they won&#039;t have the habit of walking anywhere. I had the habit already, and I still lost it when I got a car. I admit I jump in the car more than I should. But since returning from London, I have tried to walk more, and have felt good about the amount I&#039;ve done so far -- still nowhere near enough -- and for me, the train is an excuse to walk even more. There are actually a lot of places I regularly go to by car now that are near the light rail line.

The only thing that concerns me is not the walking distance to places I need to go, it&#039;s safety. When I leave work at 10pm or so, I would have to get from the north waterfront to Westlake to catch the train. The distance isn&#039;t so much the concern for me as being a small female walking alone through Belltown after dark. Oh, how I wish the Waterfront streetcar was running, and would run as late as the trains... because it&#039;s a direct connection for folks working in the Waterfront area, to the light rail at the International District. (Another reason to bring it back.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I agree, absolutely. And I have been one of those folks who complained about a one mile walk, in the past. But I had a bit of an epiphany about it last year when I visited London. They talk about an obesity epidemic in Britain &#8212; but in London, the only obese people I noticed were Americans. Everyone walks. Of course, the neighborhoods there have lots of neighborhood services that people need and are about as walkable as you can get, and they have the Tube as well as buses to get around too. But it was normal to walk all over the place. And you didn&#8217;t see a lot of fat people, though certainly they do exist there as here.</p>
<p>And then I think about when I was a kid, in Seattle, and I walked 2 miles each way to my school. (I didn&#8217;t go to my neighborhood school, which was a block away from home, and didn&#8217;t qualify for a school bus. Because my house was on a hill and the school was on a hill too, with a valley in the middle, I got to walk to school uphill both ways, too.)  ;) I was 10. This was not considered all that abnormal for a 10-year-old. But kids now, because of parental fears, don&#8217;t get to walk like that. And as adults, so many people just immediately jump in the car &#8212; and as the kids raised by overprotective parents grow up, they won&#8217;t have the habit of walking anywhere. I had the habit already, and I still lost it when I got a car. I admit I jump in the car more than I should. But since returning from London, I have tried to walk more, and have felt good about the amount I&#8217;ve done so far &#8212; still nowhere near enough &#8212; and for me, the train is an excuse to walk even more. There are actually a lot of places I regularly go to by car now that are near the light rail line.</p>
<p>The only thing that concerns me is not the walking distance to places I need to go, it&#8217;s safety. When I leave work at 10pm or so, I would have to get from the north waterfront to Westlake to catch the train. The distance isn&#8217;t so much the concern for me as being a small female walking alone through Belltown after dark. Oh, how I wish the Waterfront streetcar was running, and would run as late as the trains&#8230; because it&#8217;s a direct connection for folks working in the Waterfront area, to the light rail at the International District. (Another reason to bring it back.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55480</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55480</guid>
		<description>The Shell on Beacon Hill sells really really good fried catfish. Well worth walking over to pick some up occasionally. So in at least that case, the gas station &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; of value in a walkability ranking. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The Shell on Beacon Hill sells really really good fried catfish. Well worth walking over to pick some up occasionally. So in at least that case, the gas station <em>is</em> of value in a walkability ranking. ;)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55478</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55478</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of the two editors. 

There are more posts now. We have worked our way north to the Columbia City Station.

But there is no way we are going to get much further before tomorrow. If we are very, very lucky we will have an article about Mount Baker and one about Beacon Hill. I wanted to cover every station in the system, but we ran out of time. Oops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;m one of the two editors. </p>
<p>There are more posts now. We have worked our way north to the Columbia City Station.</p>
<p>But there is no way we are going to get much further before tomorrow. If we are very, very lucky we will have an article about Mount Baker and one about Beacon Hill. I wanted to cover every station in the system, but we ran out of time. Oops.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicadministrator</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55390</link>
		<dc:creator>publicadministrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55390</guid>
		<description>Your neighborhood is rated &quot;car dependent&quot; with all those amenities and services located within a 1/2 mile radius of your residence? That doesn&#039;t sound right.

How would the WalkScore folks rank a mcmansion on cul-de-sac in an eastside gated community?  &quot;really, really car dependent&quot;?

And of what value is the proximity of a gas station in a neighborhood walkability ranking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Your neighborhood is rated &#8220;car dependent&#8221; with all those amenities and services located within a 1/2 mile radius of your residence? That doesn&#8217;t sound right.</p>
<p>How would the WalkScore folks rank a mcmansion on cul-de-sac in an eastside gated community?  &#8220;really, really car dependent&#8221;?</p>
<p>And of what value is the proximity of a gas station in a neighborhood walkability ranking?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55381</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55381</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t simply tell me that I can&#039;t say a mile is walking distance and expect me to take you seriously.

Many people do consider a mile to be walking distance. It&#039;s a 20-minute walk for a healthy person. And yes, we need a change in those who do not view it that way. Such attitudes contribute to urban and transit planning problems as well as the obesity epidemic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
You can&#8217;t simply tell me that I can&#8217;t say a mile is walking distance and expect me to take you seriously.</p>
<p>Many people do consider a mile to be walking distance. It&#8217;s a 20-minute walk for a healthy person. And yes, we need a change in those who do not view it that way. Such attitudes contribute to urban and transit planning problems as well as the obesity epidemic.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55365</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55365</guid>
		<description>According to the Neighborhood Walk Score folks, anything a mile or more away is car-only.  Even half a mile is considered pretty far away.  (My home gets a walk score of 23, &quot;car dependent,&quot; even though we have three groceries, two gas stations, three restaurants, community center, gym, city hall, police, fire, five parks, two coffee shops, etc. within a half-mile radius.)  

I&#039;m afraid the Walk Score folks are right on this one -- even young, healthy, fit Americans don&#039;t generally consider a mile to be walking distance.  Throw in arthritis, obesity, or diseases of a sedentary lifestyle, and many people have great difficulty walking more than a few blocks.

That may change with time, but for now, you can&#039;t simply tell people that a mile is walking distance and expect them to take you seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
According to the Neighborhood Walk Score folks, anything a mile or more away is car-only.  Even half a mile is considered pretty far away.  (My home gets a walk score of 23, &#8220;car dependent,&#8221; even though we have three groceries, two gas stations, three restaurants, community center, gym, city hall, police, fire, five parks, two coffee shops, etc. within a half-mile radius.)  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid the Walk Score folks are right on this one &#8212; even young, healthy, fit Americans don&#8217;t generally consider a mile to be walking distance.  Throw in arthritis, obesity, or diseases of a sedentary lifestyle, and many people have great difficulty walking more than a few blocks.</p>
<p>That may change with time, but for now, you can&#8217;t simply tell people that a mile is walking distance and expect them to take you seriously.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: downintacoma</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55343</link>
		<dc:creator>downintacoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55343</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Sounder, I was at the Tacoma transit planning open house a few weeks ago, and I pressed several officials from various authorities (with the best info coming from ST and PT reps) about Sounder. Here&#039;s a short rundown:

1. Don&#039;t expect high-frequency non-peak hour trips anytime soon. The ST person gave a simple if prohibitive response: ST doesn&#039;t own the track, and the real owners, BNSF, aren&#039;t exactly the friendliest people at the table. Full commuter rail service (a la NY&#039;s MNRR/LIRR or Chicago&#039;s Metra) will essentially require purchase and construction of ST&#039;s own right-of-way should BNSF&#039;s current position remain. He added that it was hard enough already to run the weekend event trains. 

2. BNSF is dragging their heels on track upgrades in south Seattle, but they&#039;re almost finished (if not already). It&#039;ll speed things up through that crawl.

3. More good news: once the D-to-M St track is complete and service to Lakewood begins, Amtrak will switch from its current location to Freighthouse Sq to bypass the Pt. Defiance tunnel. Obviously, this is great on a number of levels: more foot traffic for businesses in the Dome district and (especially important) Amtrak passengers will have direct access to/from downtown Tacoma via T-Link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Speaking of Sounder, I was at the Tacoma transit planning open house a few weeks ago, and I pressed several officials from various authorities (with the best info coming from ST and PT reps) about Sounder. Here&#8217;s a short rundown:</p>
<p>1. Don&#8217;t expect high-frequency non-peak hour trips anytime soon. The ST person gave a simple if prohibitive response: ST doesn&#8217;t own the track, and the real owners, BNSF, aren&#8217;t exactly the friendliest people at the table. Full commuter rail service (a la NY&#8217;s MNRR/LIRR or Chicago&#8217;s Metra) will essentially require purchase and construction of ST&#8217;s own right-of-way should BNSF&#8217;s current position remain. He added that it was hard enough already to run the weekend event trains. </p>
<p>2. BNSF is dragging their heels on track upgrades in south Seattle, but they&#8217;re almost finished (if not already). It&#8217;ll speed things up through that crawl.</p>
<p>3. More good news: once the D-to-M St track is complete and service to Lakewood begins, Amtrak will switch from its current location to Freighthouse Sq to bypass the Pt. Defiance tunnel. Obviously, this is great on a number of levels: more foot traffic for businesses in the Dome district and (especially important) Amtrak passengers will have direct access to/from downtown Tacoma via T-Link.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55321</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not extension to Marysville that would get Sounder North more riders - it&#039;s development and better connections. When Mukilteo and Edmonds have ferry terminals connecting to the stations, you&#039;ll see ridership go up quite a bit. When downtown Everett starts to rebound in the next real estate cycle, you&#039;ll see ridership there go up as well.

But yeah, Sound Move just couldn&#039;t pass without Sounder North. It&#039;s effectively part of the cost of building Link. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It&#8217;s not extension to Marysville that would get Sounder North more riders &#8211; it&#8217;s development and better connections. When Mukilteo and Edmonds have ferry terminals connecting to the stations, you&#8217;ll see ridership go up quite a bit. When downtown Everett starts to rebound in the next real estate cycle, you&#8217;ll see ridership there go up as well.</p>
<p>But yeah, Sound Move just couldn&#8217;t pass without Sounder North. It&#8217;s effectively part of the cost of building Link. ;)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55320</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55320</guid>
		<description>That kind of thing will change with train frequency. Right now it&#039;s hard to use Sounder for anything but regular commuting, but as trips are added, users start looking at the train for more purposes than just getting to work.

It&#039;ll be a long time, of course. The four round trips in ST2 will help, but we&#039;ll need more like 20 new round trips to change travel patterns enough that all-day, regular transit to the stations starts being feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
That kind of thing will change with train frequency. Right now it&#8217;s hard to use Sounder for anything but regular commuting, but as trips are added, users start looking at the train for more purposes than just getting to work.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be a long time, of course. The four round trips in ST2 will help, but we&#8217;ll need more like 20 new round trips to change travel patterns enough that all-day, regular transit to the stations starts being feasible.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55317</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s a great piece. I didn&#039;t know you wrote for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Hey, that&#8217;s a great piece. I didn&#8217;t know you wrote for them.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55314</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55314</guid>
		<description>She describes a mile as &quot;little more than walking distance?&quot; No. A mile &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; walking distance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
She describes a mile as &#8220;little more than walking distance?&#8221; No. A mile <b>is</b> walking distance.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asp Hault</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55304</link>
		<dc:creator>Asp Hault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55304</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s still not at all clear to me exactly which buses will stop at the Tukwila station.&quot;

I realize this is way more &quot;old school&quot; that gaining all of your life information through blogs, tweets and telepathic waves, but did you bother to pick up a phone and call the transit system and ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
&#8220;It’s still not at all clear to me exactly which buses will stop at the Tukwila station.&#8221;</p>
<p>I realize this is way more &#8220;old school&#8221; that gaining all of your life information through blogs, tweets and telepathic waves, but did you bother to pick up a phone and call the transit system and ask?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asp Hault</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55303</link>
		<dc:creator>Asp Hault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55303</guid>
		<description>Blighted? Soulless? Please remember we parking lots have feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Blighted? Soulless? Please remember we parking lots have feelings.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55271</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55271</guid>
		<description>As many here know both Sound Transit and Metro are currently prohibited by city ordinance from building any new park &amp; ride lots. The current ones are grandfathered and in the case of the P&amp;R lots near Northgate the city actually doesn&#039;t mind if parking capacity is expanded for the most part (though the recent additions have been shared with retail users who don&#039;t need the lots at the same time as commuters).

For what it is worth the park &amp; ride lots in Portland along MAX don&#039;t start until well away from the city core. The closest P&amp;R to the North is Delta Park, to the East is Gateway, and to the West is Sunset, each of these is around 5 to 5.5 miles from the Portland Downtown core.

The equivalent distance on Link is about the Othello or Rainier Beach stations. For North Link the Roosevelt or Northgate stations (Roosevelt has a P&amp;R nearby at Ravenna/NE 65th &amp; I-5).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
As many here know both Sound Transit and Metro are currently prohibited by city ordinance from building any new park &amp; ride lots. The current ones are grandfathered and in the case of the P&amp;R lots near Northgate the city actually doesn&#8217;t mind if parking capacity is expanded for the most part (though the recent additions have been shared with retail users who don&#8217;t need the lots at the same time as commuters).</p>
<p>For what it is worth the park &amp; ride lots in Portland along MAX don&#8217;t start until well away from the city core. The closest P&amp;R to the North is Delta Park, to the East is Gateway, and to the West is Sunset, each of these is around 5 to 5.5 miles from the Portland Downtown core.</p>
<p>The equivalent distance on Link is about the Othello or Rainier Beach stations. For North Link the Roosevelt or Northgate stations (Roosevelt has a P&amp;R nearby at Ravenna/NE 65th &amp; I-5).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55270</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55270</guid>
		<description>[deleted, inappropriate]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[deleted, inappropriate]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55269</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55269</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I should add, the article quotes a STBer, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Oh, and I should add, the article quotes a STBer, too.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/16/seattle-times-gets-lazy/#comment-55268</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6427#comment-55268</guid>
		<description>The Beacon Hill Blog is doing a series of posts about the stations, including one about Tukwila that specifically discusses what&#039;s nearby:

http://beaconhill.seattle.wa.us/2009/07/15/going-places-on-light-rail-tukwila-and-rainier-beach-stations/

(Oops, the URL mentions Rainier Beach but we actually separated that into its own post and forgot to change the URL.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The Beacon Hill Blog is doing a series of posts about the stations, including one about Tukwila that specifically discusses what&#8217;s nearby:</p>
<p><a href="http://beaconhill.seattle.wa.us/2009/07/15/going-places-on-light-rail-tukwila-and-rainier-beach-stations/" rel="nofollow">http://beaconhill.seattle.wa.us/2009/07/15/going-places-on-light-rail-tukwila-and-rainier-beach-stations/</a></p>
<p>(Oops, the URL mentions Rainier Beach but we actually separated that into its own post and forgot to change the URL.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 423/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-25 08:56:18 -->
