<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORCA passes now accepted on SLUT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:49:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mocek</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59742</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Mocek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59742</guid>
		<description>Rob: Huh.  It seems the person who responded from ORCA was not aware of that.  Thanks for publishing the images and please don&#039;t take any personal offense at my question to ORCA about the accuracy of your report in light of the conflicting information their representative provided to me. 

As a computer software developer, I&#039;d be hesitant to rely on something that amounts to an undocumented feature of the ORCA system.  Such features are far less likely to endure than those which are part of the published interface.

I&#039;ll follow up here when I receive further responses from ORCA.  I&#039;ve also contacted the director of ACLU of Washington&#039;s Privacy Project to find out to what degree they&#039;re tracking ORCA-related issues.  They were instrumental in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu-wa.org/inthecourts/detail.cfm?id=798&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;persuading ORCA to improve privacy protection for people who use an ORCA card that is provided by their employer or school&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob: Huh.  It seems the person who responded from ORCA was not aware of that.  Thanks for publishing the images and please don&#8217;t take any personal offense at my question to ORCA about the accuracy of your report in light of the conflicting information their representative provided to me. </p>
<p>As a computer software developer, I&#8217;d be hesitant to rely on something that amounts to an undocumented feature of the ORCA system.  Such features are far less likely to endure than those which are part of the published interface.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll follow up here when I receive further responses from ORCA.  I&#8217;ve also contacted the director of ACLU of Washington&#8217;s Privacy Project to find out to what degree they&#8217;re tracking ORCA-related issues.  They were instrumental in <a href="http://www.aclu-wa.org/inthecourts/detail.cfm?id=798" rel="nofollow">persuading ORCA to improve privacy protection for people who use an ORCA card that is provided by their employer or school</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59304</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59304</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Maybe it&#039;s not officially supported?  In any case, it is possible to do on the TVMs:

Card detail request button: http://www.flickr.com/photos/40563526@N04/3777579902/

Card detail screen: http://www.flickr.com/photos/40563526@N04/3776778623/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s not officially supported?  In any case, it is possible to do on the TVMs:</p>
<p>Card detail request button: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/40563526@N04/3777579902/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/40563526@N04/3777579902/</a></p>
<p>Card detail screen: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/40563526@N04/3776778623/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/40563526@N04/3776778623/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heinousbitca</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59223</link>
		<dc:creator>heinousbitca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59223</guid>
		<description>Yes, i&#039;m discussing an ORCA *pass*. I had a $1.75 pass on my ORCA card in June, and despite that was forced to pay cash fare twice, both times on the wonderful 3, and both times by the same driver. I had a Pierce Transit driver get annoyed because &quot;I don&#039;t know how to work that (expletive) from Seattle&quot; but i was carrying the kid i babysit and he backed off because she called him a &quot;meanie.&quot; Heh heh heh.

The problem with complaining is that on the 3/4, i&#039;m the only person trying to pay with an ORCA card, and this driver is pretty abusive and vengeful toward passengers, especially other disabled passengers. If i complain, he knows who&#039;s complaining.

On PT, the driver got a talking-to and their sup was extremely apologetic. She was also willing to put it in writing that if they can&#039;t read the card, ride&#039;s on them.

Metro? No such luck. They say so, allegedly, but nothing on official web pages or letterhead. So i ended up out 3.50 for the month for buying the &quot;wrong&quot; pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, i&#8217;m discussing an ORCA *pass*. I had a $1.75 pass on my ORCA card in June, and despite that was forced to pay cash fare twice, both times on the wonderful 3, and both times by the same driver. I had a Pierce Transit driver get annoyed because &#8220;I don&#8217;t know how to work that (expletive) from Seattle&#8221; but i was carrying the kid i babysit and he backed off because she called him a &#8220;meanie.&#8221; Heh heh heh.</p>
<p>The problem with complaining is that on the 3/4, i&#8217;m the only person trying to pay with an ORCA card, and this driver is pretty abusive and vengeful toward passengers, especially other disabled passengers. If i complain, he knows who&#8217;s complaining.</p>
<p>On PT, the driver got a talking-to and their sup was extremely apologetic. She was also willing to put it in writing that if they can&#8217;t read the card, ride&#8217;s on them.</p>
<p>Metro? No such luck. They say so, allegedly, but nothing on official web pages or letterhead. So i ended up out 3.50 for the month for buying the &#8220;wrong&#8221; pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mocek</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59194</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Mocek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59194</guid>
		<description>And on second thought, it seems that Q9 may not have been answered, so I followed up with:

To clarify, I asked about any limits on the number of cards someone can acquire or limits on the frequency with which he can acquire them.  You seem to have stated that no such limits exist, but you used the phrase &quot;an ORCA card&quot;, suggesting that you thought I asked about one card, though I did not.  Do any such limits exist?  For instance, I might like to go pick up several cards, for me, friends, family, and to set aside for guests to use.  Or I might like to get myself a new card every week (say, to avoid having you track all my travel history under a single serial number).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on second thought, it seems that Q9 may not have been answered, so I followed up with:</p>
<p>To clarify, I asked about any limits on the number of cards someone can acquire or limits on the frequency with which he can acquire them.  You seem to have stated that no such limits exist, but you used the phrase &#8220;an ORCA card&#8221;, suggesting that you thought I asked about one card, though I did not.  Do any such limits exist?  For instance, I might like to go pick up several cards, for me, friends, family, and to set aside for guests to use.  Or I might like to get myself a new card every week (say, to avoid having you track all my travel history under a single serial number).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mocek</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59191</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Mocek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59191</guid>
		<description>Today, I received responses to the messages I submitted to the ORCA people Wednesday.  Six questions were answered.  Six were unanswered, presumably due to miscommunication, and prompted me to followup.

Questions that were answered:

&lt;b&gt;Q1: After the free ORCA card offer ends, will cash customers be charged more than ORCA card customers on a trip that involves a transfer?&lt;/b&gt;
A1: The introductory card fee being waived is not related to cash customers - paper transfers are.  When paper transfers are discontinued then, yes, cash customers will have to pay for each leg of their trip.

&lt;b&gt;Q5: After using my ORCA card to pay the fare for a trip on public transportation, will I receive any proof that I have paid that fare?&lt;/b&gt;
A5: If you have registered the card, then you can view the card&#039;s activity and the amount paid for each trip. Other than that, there is no proof, just as there isn&#039;t any for non-ORCA users.

&lt;b&gt;Q8: How can I acquire an ORCA card after providing only cash -- without providing a name, mailing address, e-mail address, or anything else that could personally identify me?&lt;/b&gt;
A8: If you don&#039;t want to provide your information you can add value with cash at ticket vending machine or at a customer service location.

&lt;b&gt;Q9: What, if any, limits will participating transit agencies place on the number of ORCA cards someone may acquire or the frequency with which he may acquire them?&lt;/b&gt;
A9: Currently, there aren&#039;t any limitations set for one person having an ORCA card.

&lt;b&gt;Q11: In the context of ORCA card purchases and activations, how is &quot;fare product&quot; defined?  Your Web site states, &quot;You must tap your card within 30 days of purchase to activate a fare product.&quot;  That is the only instance of the words &quot;fare product&quot; on that page.  I am unable to find a definition on your site.&lt;/b&gt;
A11: Fare product - any regional pass or agency pass or E-purse.

&lt;b&gt;Q12: How does an unactivated fare product differ from an activated fare product?&lt;/b&gt;
A12: Unactivated - card has not been tapped and the amount is pending on the card.  Activated - card has been tapped and balance shows on the card.


Questions that received responses that require followup:

&lt;b&gt;Q2. Other than repeatedly purchasing new ORCA cards anonymously with cash, how can an ORCA card user travel via public transportation without having all of his uses of public transportation tracked and linked in such a manner that if the ORCA serial number was associated with him (such as would be the case if he was found to be carrying the card by someone who could read the serial number from it), details of all of his public transportation travels would be available to interested parties with access to ORCA data?&lt;/b&gt;

ORCA response:
Don&#039;t register the card and no name will be associated with the card.

my follow-up:
&lt;i&gt;Thanks, but it seems that you misunderstood my question.  I&#039;d like to know how an ORCA card user can travel via public transportation without having all of his uses of public transportation tracked and linked in such a manner that if the card&#039;s serial number was later associated with him (I understand that it can initially not be the case) details of all of his ORCA-paid public transportation travels would be available to anyone with access to ORCA data.

One way to accomplish such travel would be to repeatedly acquire new ORCA cards.  This would prevent all travel from being tracked under a single card serial number.  Unfortunately, that will eventually cost $5 per card.

Your suggestion, to decline to register the card, does indeed prevent a name from being associated with the card, but does not prevent a record of all travels using the card to be stored somewhere (your privacy statement dated June 2, 2009 [1] says that transit agencies will retail travel records for as long as they find it useful to do so), and thus to accumulate a record that *will* be associated with the passenger if the card serial number is eventually linked to him -- something which would seemingly be a simple matter, given that he will be carrying a card with that number both printed on and stored electronically in it.

[1]: http://www.orcacard.com/ERG-Seattle/common/images/ORCA%20Privacy%20Statement.pdf

Can you explain how someone will be able to travel without having a record of all his travels stored -- even in an initially-anonymous manner -- without paying cash (which will cost extra unless no transfers are ever involved) and without repeatedly forking over $5 to ORCA to start a new anonymous history?&lt;/i&gt;


&lt;b&gt;Q3. Under what circumstances will the remaining balance on an ORCA card be canceled?&lt;/b&gt;

ORCA response:
If the card has an E-purse balance, a customer can request a refund. Otherwise, the balance is not cancelled.

my follow-up:
&lt;i&gt;Thanks, but it seems that you misunderstood my question.  I&#039;d like to know under what circumstances under which remaining e-purse balance on an ORCA card will be canceled.  It seems that one such circumstance would be if the card was registered and the owner reported it lost or stolen, as the balance on the old card would be canceled and added to the new card.  Are there any other circumstances?  For instance, if I have a card with remaining e-purse balance and I don&#039;t use it for a long period of time.  Your site doesn&#039;t seem to say.&lt;/i&gt;


&lt;b&gt;Q4. Other than the time at which I board a public transportation vehicle and wave my ORCA card near the card reader, under what, if any, circumstances am I required to present my ORCA card — which seemingly is the link to a record of all my ORCA-paid public transportation use — to someone, and what law compels me to do so?&lt;/b&gt;

ORCA response:
If the card is not registered, then there is no name associated to it. Even if the card is registered, it still allows for persons other than the registered name to use the card -
we only know which route or station location the card was tapped.

If you&#039;d like, we can send you a copy of our terms of use and privacy statement to you. If interested, please email your mailing address.

my follow-up:
&lt;i&gt;Thanks, but it seems that you misunderstood my question.  I&#039;d like to know under what, if any, circumstances I am required to present my ORCA card to someone, and what, if any, law compels me to do so.

The bit about the card being a link to a record of all my ORCA-paid transportation seems to have confused things.  I included it in my message to you only to explain why someone might be concerned about presenting his card to someone -- particularly if until the time of presentation, the card was not associated with him, since it was unregistered.&lt;/i&gt;


&lt;b&gt;Q6. What, if any, information other than a serial number is stored on an ORCA card after it has been used?&lt;/b&gt;

ORCA response:
Any transportation value is stored on the ORCA card.

my follow-up:
&lt;i&gt;Are you sure that the only information stored on the card after it has been used is a serial number and any transportation value?  Other people I&#039;ve spoken to are confident that much more information is stored on it, but I hoped to find out from an authoritative source on the matter:  you.&lt;/i&gt;


&lt;b&gt;Q7. How can I check the balance of an ORCA card in my possession without boarding a public transportation vehicle, registering on the ORCA Web site, or identifying myself?&lt;/b&gt;

ORCA response:
You can&#039;t check the balance of a unregistered card.

my follow-up:
&lt;i&gt;I cannot check the balance of an unregistered card at all, or cannot check it without boarding a public transportation vehicle or identifying myself?  In a recent discussion on the Seattle Transit Blog [1], someone wrote, &#039;With regard to your question about checking the balance of an ORCA card, just go to a TVM. You can buy a pass, add value or check value without ever registering your card.&quot;  Was that person mistaken?

References:
[1]: http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58754 &lt;/i&gt;


&lt;b&gt;Q10. How soon, if ever, will an unused card without any e-purse credit (e.g., an extra that I acquire and set aside for a visiting guest to use at a later date) expire after I acquire it?&lt;/b&gt;

ORCA response:
The actual card is expected to last at least 5 years.

my follow-up:
&lt;i&gt;Sorry, I didn&#039;t mean to ask how long the card is expected to last under normal use without physically failing, I meant to ask when, if ever, an ORCA card that I acquire and set aside without using will &quot;expire&quot;.  I understand that sometime in the future, more technologically-advanced systems may be used and the existing system, using the Mifare Desfire cards in whatever manner you use them may be phased out, but until then, will a card acquired, say, tomorrow, but never registered, with no balance on it, still be useful to me?

One reason this information would be useful is that someone might want to purchase extra cards for guests to use at a later date.  Those $5 expenditures would be wasted if the cards &quot;expire&quot; before use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I received responses to the messages I submitted to the ORCA people Wednesday.  Six questions were answered.  Six were unanswered, presumably due to miscommunication, and prompted me to followup.</p>
<p>Questions that were answered:</p>
<p><b>Q1: After the free ORCA card offer ends, will cash customers be charged more than ORCA card customers on a trip that involves a transfer?</b><br />
A1: The introductory card fee being waived is not related to cash customers &#8211; paper transfers are.  When paper transfers are discontinued then, yes, cash customers will have to pay for each leg of their trip.</p>
<p><b>Q5: After using my ORCA card to pay the fare for a trip on public transportation, will I receive any proof that I have paid that fare?</b><br />
A5: If you have registered the card, then you can view the card&#8217;s activity and the amount paid for each trip. Other than that, there is no proof, just as there isn&#8217;t any for non-ORCA users.</p>
<p><b>Q8: How can I acquire an ORCA card after providing only cash &#8212; without providing a name, mailing address, e-mail address, or anything else that could personally identify me?</b><br />
A8: If you don&#8217;t want to provide your information you can add value with cash at ticket vending machine or at a customer service location.</p>
<p><b>Q9: What, if any, limits will participating transit agencies place on the number of ORCA cards someone may acquire or the frequency with which he may acquire them?</b><br />
A9: Currently, there aren&#8217;t any limitations set for one person having an ORCA card.</p>
<p><b>Q11: In the context of ORCA card purchases and activations, how is &#8220;fare product&#8221; defined?  Your Web site states, &#8220;You must tap your card within 30 days of purchase to activate a fare product.&#8221;  That is the only instance of the words &#8220;fare product&#8221; on that page.  I am unable to find a definition on your site.</b><br />
A11: Fare product &#8211; any regional pass or agency pass or E-purse.</p>
<p><b>Q12: How does an unactivated fare product differ from an activated fare product?</b><br />
A12: Unactivated &#8211; card has not been tapped and the amount is pending on the card.  Activated &#8211; card has been tapped and balance shows on the card.</p>
<p>Questions that received responses that require followup:</p>
<p><b>Q2. Other than repeatedly purchasing new ORCA cards anonymously with cash, how can an ORCA card user travel via public transportation without having all of his uses of public transportation tracked and linked in such a manner that if the ORCA serial number was associated with him (such as would be the case if he was found to be carrying the card by someone who could read the serial number from it), details of all of his public transportation travels would be available to interested parties with access to ORCA data?</b></p>
<p>ORCA response:<br />
Don&#8217;t register the card and no name will be associated with the card.</p>
<p>my follow-up:<br />
<i>Thanks, but it seems that you misunderstood my question.  I&#8217;d like to know how an ORCA card user can travel via public transportation without having all of his uses of public transportation tracked and linked in such a manner that if the card&#8217;s serial number was later associated with him (I understand that it can initially not be the case) details of all of his ORCA-paid public transportation travels would be available to anyone with access to ORCA data.</p>
<p>One way to accomplish such travel would be to repeatedly acquire new ORCA cards.  This would prevent all travel from being tracked under a single card serial number.  Unfortunately, that will eventually cost $5 per card.</p>
<p>Your suggestion, to decline to register the card, does indeed prevent a name from being associated with the card, but does not prevent a record of all travels using the card to be stored somewhere (your privacy statement dated June 2, 2009 [1] says that transit agencies will retail travel records for as long as they find it useful to do so), and thus to accumulate a record that *will* be associated with the passenger if the card serial number is eventually linked to him &#8212; something which would seemingly be a simple matter, given that he will be carrying a card with that number both printed on and stored electronically in it.</p>
<p>[1]: <a href="http://www.orcacard.com/ERG-Seattle/common/images/ORCA%20Privacy%20Statement.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.orcacard.com/ERG-Seattle/common/images/ORCA%20Privacy%20Statement.pdf</a></p>
<p>Can you explain how someone will be able to travel without having a record of all his travels stored &#8212; even in an initially-anonymous manner &#8212; without paying cash (which will cost extra unless no transfers are ever involved) and without repeatedly forking over $5 to ORCA to start a new anonymous history?</i></p>
<p><b>Q3. Under what circumstances will the remaining balance on an ORCA card be canceled?</b></p>
<p>ORCA response:<br />
If the card has an E-purse balance, a customer can request a refund. Otherwise, the balance is not cancelled.</p>
<p>my follow-up:<br />
<i>Thanks, but it seems that you misunderstood my question.  I&#8217;d like to know under what circumstances under which remaining e-purse balance on an ORCA card will be canceled.  It seems that one such circumstance would be if the card was registered and the owner reported it lost or stolen, as the balance on the old card would be canceled and added to the new card.  Are there any other circumstances?  For instance, if I have a card with remaining e-purse balance and I don&#8217;t use it for a long period of time.  Your site doesn&#8217;t seem to say.</i></p>
<p><b>Q4. Other than the time at which I board a public transportation vehicle and wave my ORCA card near the card reader, under what, if any, circumstances am I required to present my ORCA card — which seemingly is the link to a record of all my ORCA-paid public transportation use — to someone, and what law compels me to do so?</b></p>
<p>ORCA response:<br />
If the card is not registered, then there is no name associated to it. Even if the card is registered, it still allows for persons other than the registered name to use the card -<br />
we only know which route or station location the card was tapped.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like, we can send you a copy of our terms of use and privacy statement to you. If interested, please email your mailing address.</p>
<p>my follow-up:<br />
<i>Thanks, but it seems that you misunderstood my question.  I&#8217;d like to know under what, if any, circumstances I am required to present my ORCA card to someone, and what, if any, law compels me to do so.</p>
<p>The bit about the card being a link to a record of all my ORCA-paid transportation seems to have confused things.  I included it in my message to you only to explain why someone might be concerned about presenting his card to someone &#8212; particularly if until the time of presentation, the card was not associated with him, since it was unregistered.</i></p>
<p><b>Q6. What, if any, information other than a serial number is stored on an ORCA card after it has been used?</b></p>
<p>ORCA response:<br />
Any transportation value is stored on the ORCA card.</p>
<p>my follow-up:<br />
<i>Are you sure that the only information stored on the card after it has been used is a serial number and any transportation value?  Other people I&#8217;ve spoken to are confident that much more information is stored on it, but I hoped to find out from an authoritative source on the matter:  you.</i></p>
<p><b>Q7. How can I check the balance of an ORCA card in my possession without boarding a public transportation vehicle, registering on the ORCA Web site, or identifying myself?</b></p>
<p>ORCA response:<br />
You can&#8217;t check the balance of a unregistered card.</p>
<p>my follow-up:<br />
<i>I cannot check the balance of an unregistered card at all, or cannot check it without boarding a public transportation vehicle or identifying myself?  In a recent discussion on the Seattle Transit Blog [1], someone wrote, &#8216;With regard to your question about checking the balance of an ORCA card, just go to a TVM. You can buy a pass, add value or check value without ever registering your card.&#8221;  Was that person mistaken?</p>
<p>References:<br />
[1]: <a href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58754" rel="nofollow">http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58754</a> </i></p>
<p><b>Q10. How soon, if ever, will an unused card without any e-purse credit (e.g., an extra that I acquire and set aside for a visiting guest to use at a later date) expire after I acquire it?</b></p>
<p>ORCA response:<br />
The actual card is expected to last at least 5 years.</p>
<p>my follow-up:<br />
<i>Sorry, I didn&#8217;t mean to ask how long the card is expected to last under normal use without physically failing, I meant to ask when, if ever, an ORCA card that I acquire and set aside without using will &#8220;expire&#8221;.  I understand that sometime in the future, more technologically-advanced systems may be used and the existing system, using the Mifare Desfire cards in whatever manner you use them may be phased out, but until then, will a card acquired, say, tomorrow, but never registered, with no balance on it, still be useful to me?</p>
<p>One reason this information would be useful is that someone might want to purchase extra cards for guests to use at a later date.  Those $5 expenditures would be wasted if the cards &#8220;expire&#8221; before use.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59037</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59037</guid>
		<description>I know that but the beeps are different. There is a OK beep, an error beep, a low balance/pass expiring beep, for example. That&#039;s enough for me to know whether a card read was successful or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that but the beeps are different. There is a OK beep, an error beep, a low balance/pass expiring beep, for example. That&#8217;s enough for me to know whether a card read was successful or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59036</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59036</guid>
		<description>Actually I&#039;m fine with epowering drivers to enforce fares more so than now.  As it is, drivers can actually be reprimanded for asking for a fare if the customer calls to complain that they felt that the driver &quot;embarassed&quot; them by doing so.  While I agree with the no fare disputes policy, passengers should hopefully see the driver as &quot;in charge&quot; of the bus, and not just a wheel-turning automaton that they can thumb their nose at over everything from paying the fare to yapping loudly on their cell phones to harassing other passengers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I&#8217;m fine with epowering drivers to enforce fares more so than now.  As it is, drivers can actually be reprimanded for asking for a fare if the customer calls to complain that they felt that the driver &#8220;embarassed&#8221; them by doing so.  While I agree with the no fare disputes policy, passengers should hopefully see the driver as &#8220;in charge&#8221; of the bus, and not just a wheel-turning automaton that they can thumb their nose at over everything from paying the fare to yapping loudly on their cell phones to harassing other passengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59034</guid>
		<description>The beep is just an acknowledgement that something happened.  Could be the fare went through, could be a &quot;try again&quot; message, could be an &quot;insufficient funds&quot; message, could be a &quot;pass back&quot;.  All result in a beep, so hearing beeps without seeing the screen on the DDU or ORCA won&#039;t tell you much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beep is just an acknowledgement that something happened.  Could be the fare went through, could be a &#8220;try again&#8221; message, could be an &#8220;insufficient funds&#8221; message, could be a &#8220;pass back&#8221;.  All result in a beep, so hearing beeps without seeing the screen on the DDU or ORCA won&#8217;t tell you much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59023</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59023</guid>
		<description>Differentiating passes and e-purses defeats the versatility of ORCA as the point is to have all of that in one durable card that&#039;s reusable and lasts for years. The key is differentiating youth, adult, and senior/disablity cards. Of which the RRFP is already different. The youth cards have the expiration date of youth eligibilty inside so that they can&#039;t cheat anyway.

Eventually the ORCA card will become the only type of fare media, other than cash, in circulation. Cash payment won&#039;t ever be going away. I remember SKAT trying out cashless fare payment (that required pre-purchased fare cards) for a while before reinstating fareboxes that take cash last year.

Besides, it shouldn&#039;t be the job of drivers to enforce fares anyway. I think you would agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Differentiating passes and e-purses defeats the versatility of ORCA as the point is to have all of that in one durable card that&#8217;s reusable and lasts for years. The key is differentiating youth, adult, and senior/disablity cards. Of which the RRFP is already different. The youth cards have the expiration date of youth eligibilty inside so that they can&#8217;t cheat anyway.</p>
<p>Eventually the ORCA card will become the only type of fare media, other than cash, in circulation. Cash payment won&#8217;t ever be going away. I remember SKAT trying out cashless fare payment (that required pre-purchased fare cards) for a while before reinstating fareboxes that take cash last year.</p>
<p>Besides, it shouldn&#8217;t be the job of drivers to enforce fares anyway. I think you would agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Lorimer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59016</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Lorimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59016</guid>
		<description>I could see doing a different color for youth and adult cards, but I don&#039;t see differentiating beyond that. I get a flex pass from my employer, and come next February its replacement will be on an ORCA. If I want to add money to it (for ferry rides for example), your method would require that I carry 2 cards: one with my flex pass and one for my e-purse. It would be far too difficult for a large employer to ask each person if they needed a FlexPass only card, or a FlexPass plus e-purse card. Plus many would think they only needed the FlexPass, then a couple months later decide they wanted to add money, and they&#039;d be out of luck (FlexPasses are good for 12 months).

Plus we&#039;re just experiencing start-up issues right now. Once everyone gets more used to the system (drivers and passengers both) things will go much more smoothly. Similar systems work well in other parts of the world, and will here too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see doing a different color for youth and adult cards, but I don&#8217;t see differentiating beyond that. I get a flex pass from my employer, and come next February its replacement will be on an ORCA. If I want to add money to it (for ferry rides for example), your method would require that I carry 2 cards: one with my flex pass and one for my e-purse. It would be far too difficult for a large employer to ask each person if they needed a FlexPass only card, or a FlexPass plus e-purse card. Plus many would think they only needed the FlexPass, then a couple months later decide they wanted to add money, and they&#8217;d be out of luck (FlexPasses are good for 12 months).</p>
<p>Plus we&#8217;re just experiencing start-up issues right now. Once everyone gets more used to the system (drivers and passengers both) things will go much more smoothly. Similar systems work well in other parts of the world, and will here too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59013</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59013</guid>
		<description>Different graphic designs for different types of ORCA card, just like there are currently different designs for different kinds of passes.  They can remain branded with the ORCA logo etc. with some sort of indication as to whether it&#039;s an adult pass, youth pass, monthly, e-purse only, etc.

Not rocket science, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different graphic designs for different types of ORCA card, just like there are currently different designs for different kinds of passes.  They can remain branded with the ORCA logo etc. with some sort of indication as to whether it&#8217;s an adult pass, youth pass, monthly, e-purse only, etc.</p>
<p>Not rocket science, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-59004</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-59004</guid>
		<description>What do you propose to remedy that?

RRFP ORCA cards are photo ID but youth ORCAs look the same as adult ORCAs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you propose to remedy that?</p>
<p>RRFP ORCA cards are photo ID but youth ORCAs look the same as adult ORCAs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58996</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58996</guid>
		<description>Steve,
Well a lot more people used it than use the free bus which replaced it.
It was often full during tourist season and could have quite a few people on it even in the dead of winter.
True a lot of the riders were tourists, but other than just novelty rides they were using it to get back and forth along the waterfront, to/from the ID, King Street Station, and Pioneer Square. A popular transit line is a popular transit line no matter who is riding it or for what reason.
I think the average daily ridership was somewhere around 2000 but I&#039;m not exactly sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
Well a lot more people used it than use the free bus which replaced it.<br />
It was often full during tourist season and could have quite a few people on it even in the dead of winter.<br />
True a lot of the riders were tourists, but other than just novelty rides they were using it to get back and forth along the waterfront, to/from the ID, King Street Station, and Pioneer Square. A popular transit line is a popular transit line no matter who is riding it or for what reason.<br />
I think the average daily ridership was somewhere around 2000 but I&#8217;m not exactly sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58985</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58985</guid>
		<description>No way for a driver to know that if the reader isn&#039;t working - as all ORCA cards look exactly the same.  Another flaw in the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way for a driver to know that if the reader isn&#8217;t working &#8211; as all ORCA cards look exactly the same.  Another flaw in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58981</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58981</guid>
		<description>Hmm, that&#039;s funny because I&#039;ve made some rather substantial shopping trips on public transit or via walking. I suspect the amounts I spent were well in excess of the average amount spent in a single trip to Bellevue Square.

Ok I&#039;ll admit I&#039;m hardly the average shopper but it isn&#039;t true that people prepared to spend substantial amounts of money don&#039;t arrive to stores via transit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that&#8217;s funny because I&#8217;ve made some rather substantial shopping trips on public transit or via walking. I suspect the amounts I spent were well in excess of the average amount spent in a single trip to Bellevue Square.</p>
<p>Ok I&#8217;ll admit I&#8217;m hardly the average shopper but it isn&#8217;t true that people prepared to spend substantial amounts of money don&#8217;t arrive to stores via transit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58979</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58979</guid>
		<description>Well my ORCA has both a $2 Puget Pass and an e-purse so most of the time I&#039;m not getting a &quot;free&quot; ride when the reader doesn&#039;t work. At worst it is the difference between the value of my pass and the fare amount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well my ORCA has both a $2 Puget Pass and an e-purse so most of the time I&#8217;m not getting a &#8220;free&#8221; ride when the reader doesn&#8217;t work. At worst it is the difference between the value of my pass and the fare amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58943</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58943</guid>
		<description>I got the &quot;try again&quot; error the first few times and learned quickly about the proper way to tap the card. I can&#039;t believe that those little handouts and posters ST produced tell people to &quot;tap on farebox&quot; for buses. Which is totally wrong.

There was one time I tapped got the &quot;try again&quot; many times. This was on a 40-ft Gillig. The driver said the system said the card was broken. No way, I just tapped off Link light rail before that trip and it worked just fine.

I listen for the beeps when people pay to gauge how things are going. Are there any situations when the reader will not beep?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the &#8220;try again&#8221; error the first few times and learned quickly about the proper way to tap the card. I can&#8217;t believe that those little handouts and posters ST produced tell people to &#8220;tap on farebox&#8221; for buses. Which is totally wrong.</p>
<p>There was one time I tapped got the &#8220;try again&#8221; many times. This was on a 40-ft Gillig. The driver said the system said the card was broken. No way, I just tapped off Link light rail before that trip and it worked just fine.</p>
<p>I listen for the beeps when people pay to gauge how things are going. Are there any situations when the reader will not beep?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58942</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58942</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I wasn’t happy at the overload of payments I made when I took a casual trip on Link last week. Just getting out at stations en-route and getting back on, seemed to add charges continually as I went. I have written to Orca to investigate and so far have not had a reply. It seemed to me, that I was getting charged getting on at stations and getting charged when I got off at stations regardless of whether I was in the two-hour transfer limit or not. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is most likely that they were not an &quot;overload of payments&quot; but instead payments, refunds, and transfer notifications. 

For example, the other day we went from Beacon Hill to the ID, got out and had lunch, then went from the ID to Tukwila with a friend who had never ridden Link before, then back from Tukwila to Columbia City where we got out and saw a movie, then from Columbia City to Beacon Hill and home.

Here&#039;s how ORCA recorded it (edited a bit for clarity and to save space):

04:21 PM / Purse Use on Entry / SOT, BEACON HILL STATION / -2.25	
04:32 PM / Purse Rebate On Exit / SOT, INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT STATION / 0.50	
05:43 PM / Purse Use on Entry	 / SOT, INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT STATION / -0.75
06:23 PM / Purse Use on Exit / SOT, TUKWILA/S. 154TH STATION	 / 	 - 
06:28 PM / Purse Use on Entry / SOT, TUKWILA/S. 154TH STATION	 / 	 -	
06:48 PM / Purse Use on Exit / SOT, COLUMBIA CITY/EDMUNDS STATION	 / 	 -	
11:04 PM / Purse Use on Entry / SOT, COLUMBIA CITY/EDMUNDS STATION	 / 	-2.00	
11:11 PM / Purse Rebate On Exit / SOT, BEACON HILL STATION	 / 	0.25	

So here&#039;s how it went -- we entered the system at the Beacon Hill station and I tapped my ORCA card. It was debited 2.25, which is the maximum Link fare from Beacon Hill to any point on the route. I tapped to exit at the ID station, and my card was &lt;em&gt;credited&lt;/em&gt; 0.50, because the fare from BH to ID is only 1.75.  When we got back on the train an hour later, we were still within the transfer period so I was not charged a whole new fare, but my card was debited 0.75 to bring the fare up to the maximum Link fare, 2.50, from the ID station to any point on the route. 

We then rode Link to Tukwila. We exited there and no charges were made, and no debits either, since we rode to the end of the line and so the total $2.50 fare was correct.

We looked around then tapped back in at Tukwila five minutes later. Still in the transfer period, so the card was not debited. Twenty minutes later, I tapped back out at Columbia City. Still in the transfer period, so the card was not debited. 

Several hours later, after the movie, I tapped back in at Columbia City. The card was then debited 2.00, the maximum fare from Columbia City to any point on the line. Then I tapped out at Beacon Hill, and was credited 0.25 since the fare to Beacon Hill from CC is only 1.75.

Starting to make sense, now?  I too thought ORCA might be overcharging me at first. But when looking up the transaction history on the website, it was clear that it&#039;s actually working well. But I do think it is confusing to people, those debits and charges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;I wasn’t happy at the overload of payments I made when I took a casual trip on Link last week. Just getting out at stations en-route and getting back on, seemed to add charges continually as I went. I have written to Orca to investigate and so far have not had a reply. It seemed to me, that I was getting charged getting on at stations and getting charged when I got off at stations regardless of whether I was in the two-hour transfer limit or not. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>It is most likely that they were not an &#8220;overload of payments&#8221; but instead payments, refunds, and transfer notifications. </p>
<p>For example, the other day we went from Beacon Hill to the ID, got out and had lunch, then went from the ID to Tukwila with a friend who had never ridden Link before, then back from Tukwila to Columbia City where we got out and saw a movie, then from Columbia City to Beacon Hill and home.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how ORCA recorded it (edited a bit for clarity and to save space):</p>
<p>04:21 PM / Purse Use on Entry / SOT, BEACON HILL STATION / -2.25<br />
04:32 PM / Purse Rebate On Exit / SOT, INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT STATION / 0.50<br />
05:43 PM / Purse Use on Entry	 / SOT, INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT STATION / -0.75<br />
06:23 PM / Purse Use on Exit / SOT, TUKWILA/S. 154TH STATION	 / 	 &#8211;<br />
06:28 PM / Purse Use on Entry / SOT, TUKWILA/S. 154TH STATION	 / 	 -<br />
06:48 PM / Purse Use on Exit / SOT, COLUMBIA CITY/EDMUNDS STATION	 / 	 -<br />
11:04 PM / Purse Use on Entry / SOT, COLUMBIA CITY/EDMUNDS STATION	 / 	-2.00<br />
11:11 PM / Purse Rebate On Exit / SOT, BEACON HILL STATION	 / 	0.25	</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s how it went &#8212; we entered the system at the Beacon Hill station and I tapped my ORCA card. It was debited 2.25, which is the maximum Link fare from Beacon Hill to any point on the route. I tapped to exit at the ID station, and my card was <em>credited</em> 0.50, because the fare from BH to ID is only 1.75.  When we got back on the train an hour later, we were still within the transfer period so I was not charged a whole new fare, but my card was debited 0.75 to bring the fare up to the maximum Link fare, 2.50, from the ID station to any point on the route. </p>
<p>We then rode Link to Tukwila. We exited there and no charges were made, and no debits either, since we rode to the end of the line and so the total $2.50 fare was correct.</p>
<p>We looked around then tapped back in at Tukwila five minutes later. Still in the transfer period, so the card was not debited. Twenty minutes later, I tapped back out at Columbia City. Still in the transfer period, so the card was not debited. </p>
<p>Several hours later, after the movie, I tapped back in at Columbia City. The card was then debited 2.00, the maximum fare from Columbia City to any point on the line. Then I tapped out at Beacon Hill, and was credited 0.25 since the fare to Beacon Hill from CC is only 1.75.</p>
<p>Starting to make sense, now?  I too thought ORCA might be overcharging me at first. But when looking up the transaction history on the website, it was clear that it&#8217;s actually working well. But I do think it is confusing to people, those debits and charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58936</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58936</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind too that unless you&#039;re sitting up front watching people use the ORCA reader - you&#039;re not going to notice the problems as a passenger.

Could be too that you&#039;ve got good palm english and are able to tap your card in the right way, as many seem not to getting the &quot;try again&quot; message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind too that unless you&#8217;re sitting up front watching people use the ORCA reader &#8211; you&#8217;re not going to notice the problems as a passenger.</p>
<p>Could be too that you&#8217;ve got good palm english and are able to tap your card in the right way, as many seem not to getting the &#8220;try again&#8221; message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/07/27/orca-passes-now-accepted-on-seattle-streetcar/#comment-58930</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6676#comment-58930</guid>
		<description>My perspective is as a driver.  I agree that the concept is great, and very much support the move to the technology.  This system however seems to have an inordinate amount of glitches, and as observed here - people tend to blame things on the driver when it isn&#039;t working right.

If the system worked as it should - my &quot;sucks&quot; comment wouldn&#039;t stand.  As it is, with the frequent &quot;try again&quot; and &quot;out of service&quot; issues, I have a hard time recommending that anyone use it, and can report anecdotally that a lot of ORCA users are getting free rides due to these errors.  The more people who use it - the more free rides.

Not that Metro in particular prioritizes fare collection, but you get the idea.  It&#039;s frustrating when the darn thing doesn&#039;t work - and it often doesn&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My perspective is as a driver.  I agree that the concept is great, and very much support the move to the technology.  This system however seems to have an inordinate amount of glitches, and as observed here &#8211; people tend to blame things on the driver when it isn&#8217;t working right.</p>
<p>If the system worked as it should &#8211; my &#8220;sucks&#8221; comment wouldn&#8217;t stand.  As it is, with the frequent &#8220;try again&#8221; and &#8220;out of service&#8221; issues, I have a hard time recommending that anyone use it, and can report anecdotally that a lot of ORCA users are getting free rides due to these errors.  The more people who use it &#8211; the more free rides.</p>
<p>Not that Metro in particular prioritizes fare collection, but you get the idea.  It&#8217;s frustrating when the darn thing doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; and it often doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
