July 28, 2009 at 9:55 am

It’s Going To Happen

Late last night, a man jumped in front of Link in SoDo. He climbed over the Jersey barrier south of Holgate. He went under the train, and did not live.

It’s disappointing when someone decides that’s their only way out. I feel sorry for the operator, too. I hope Metro offers a good mental health plan, and I hope the operator gets paid leave if they want it.

 Seattle Transit Blog logo Comments RSS feed |

Comment by Tim C.
2009-07-28 09:59:35

The rail haters are already cynically using this to try to discredit our rail system on the Seattle Times website. They demand a level of safety far above what they accept for their beloved automobiles…

Comment by AJ
2009-07-28 10:20:19

[Comment deleted: ad hominem.]

 
Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 10:47:06

Of course, they don’t discredit freight trains, where this happens pretty regularly.

Comment by Oran Viriyincy
2009-07-28 11:52:21

It has happened quite frequently this year and no one’s saying we should have grade separated the freight tracks.

Nothing is fool-proof.

Comment by Greg
2009-07-29 12:14:26

You can’t make anything foolproof; fools are too damned ingenious.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by RobertSeattle
2009-07-28 10:07:35

Local news tends to not report suicides (bridge jumps, guns, etc) so it will be interesting to see how these are handled in the future.

 
Comment by Galen
2009-07-28 10:09:00

Sounds like a suicide act. He went over the fence and did this on purpose, so I wouldn’t be surprised. It doesn’t mean it’s being discredited….stupid anti rail people. *rme*

Comment by Gordon Werner
2009-07-28 10:22:04

could also just be drunk … like those idiots who climbed on top of the Amtrak train in Boston and then sued when they got zapped by the catenary lines there

 
 
Comment by Gordon Werner
2009-07-28 10:20:33

I am so sick and tired of the comment trolls on the Seattle Times web site …

Comment by Jessica
2009-07-28 10:23:36

I’ve given up on the Times ages ago because of the trolls

Comment by Tim Whittome
2009-07-28 11:07:48

I agree, Jessica and these so called ‘comments’ are supposed to be an excellent replacement for official letters to the newspaper. I used to have letters published on transportation in the Times, but I don’t bother with these ‘twitter’ like missives people send to the website.

It is sad when anyone uses anything in the city to play out their suicidal thoughts – whether it be the Aurora Bridge or now, Link. These things are sadly inevitable in a complex society with a screwed up economic situation. The weather is hot and oppressive too – all a bad mix….

Comment by Matt
2009-07-28 11:16:27

And a guy just drowned in Lake Washington. Weird stuff is happening. Walking around town the past couple days is starting to feel like Do the Right Thing.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Gordon Werner
2009-07-28 16:24:22

uh oh … we better ban the lake!

 
Comment by Matt
2009-07-28 16:33:04

Don’t ban the lake… just grade-separate it!

 
Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 16:59:50

Elevate the lake!

 
Comment by Oran Viriyincy
2009-07-28 17:13:48

Put the lake underground and build a park! Like Cal Anderson.

 
Comment by Sherwin
2009-07-28 18:52:10

People, people, clearly there is only one option. The lake is evidently such a waste of taxpayer money. Let’s stick wheels on it and let it run on existing roads, which should be widened tenfold.

 
Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 20:23:14

It should be turned into a park and ride.

 
Comment by Matt the Engineer
2009-07-29 07:28:52

Think about how much we’ll improve traffic flow if we just drain the thing and pave a few dozen lanes of freeway.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Kevin
2009-07-28 10:48:15

The seattle times in general has turned into a joke lately. I’m not sure how such a liberal city ended up with a paper like that. The headline on seattle times bothers me: “Light-rail train kills man on tracks”. They make it sound like light rail was at fault.

Comment by lazarus
2009-07-28 11:17:49

At least up until the demise of the PI, the bulk of the subscribership for the Seattle Times actually came from the Eastside and not Seattle proper. Hence the Times tends to reflect a more conservative, pro-roads agenda then you would find in more progressive Seattle proper. And of course ownership has an impact too….

That said, the loss of the PI has really allowed the Times to dumb down there coverage and start adding all sorts of annoying on-line adds. Even as an only paper, they are still under financial stress and their recent declines in quality attest to just how bad it is.

Comment by Chris Stefan
2009-07-28 12:57:55

A number of people have been predicting the Times may soon follow the PI and cease publication. Both because of the difficulties in the newspaper business as a whole and because of their over-leveraged financial position.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 20:24:55

I sure hope so.

 
 
Comment by Matt L
2009-07-31 13:42:00

Gotta love this. “Oops, we quoted someone who doesn’t actually exist.” Even better is that they discovered the error because someone at the Stranger was trying to follow up…

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Tim
2009-07-28 10:58:10

I’m sick of the Times in general. It’s not until the bottom of the second paragraph that they give a hint it was not ST’s fault. Their damn headline even makes it sound like it’s ST’s fault.

And Jessica, I doubt you use Greasemonkey, but anyone that has it can Hide comments on the Seattle Times website.

Comment by Jessica
2009-07-28 11:14:05

I’m a ‘Softie! you expect me to use Firefox + Greasemonkey!? (joking)

 
Comment by Oran Viriyincy
2009-07-28 11:54:45

They should add a function to ‘ignore’ and hide comments by people you don’t want to read. There’s a particular list of trolls that have been going at it for years and years.

 
 
Comment by Sherwin
2009-07-28 11:13:47

Luckily, for every troll there’s three reasonable comments. I think people are getting the gist that suicides by train happen so frequently, that if this is at all surprising, you must have been living in a box.

 
 
Comment by Jessica
2009-07-28 10:22:25

If I was the person in charge of paid leave for Metro, I’d offer it to the operator if they needed it. I know I would need both paid leave + counseling if I was the operator.
Thoughts & prayers with the operator, their family, and any passenger who saw/realized what happened

 
Comment by AJ
2009-07-28 10:40:20

I know the bus driver who yanked out the wires on my route nearly had a nervous breakdown from the amazingly negative reaction from riders, so I can only imagine how this driver is feeling.

Comment by Matt
2009-07-28 10:45:54

Yanked out the wires?

Comment by AJ
2009-07-28 10:52:58

Yeah, the Madrona Loop has gotten screwed up a couple of times in the past couple of years like that.

Comment by Matt
2009-07-28 10:54:23

What do you mean?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by AJ
2009-07-28 11:41:34

Trolleybus got snagged on the wires, it pulled off a couple of the guidewires and they became impassable.

 
Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 20:34:36

Ah, I see. Ouch.

 
 
Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 11:23:34

I don’t think people understand what ‘yanking out the wires’ means.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Jeff Welch
2009-07-28 20:49:36

Bus passengers – regardless of walk of life – tend to go from a relatively civilized group of human beings to a savage band of “Lord of the Flies” idiots in a relatively short period of time when anything goes wrong with a bus.

There’s nothing like trying to correct a problem with people complaining, firing rapid fire questions, demanding off (and on) the bus, banging on the bus etc. all while traffic is backing up.

Good times.

 
 
Comment by Zach Shaner
2009-07-28 11:01:22

Ben’s exactly right…it will happen. There is no completely safe mode of transportation.

Fatalities in the U.S in 2007:

41,059 Highway
845 Combined Railroad
769 Combined Waterborne
535 Combined Aviation
214 Combined Transit

http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_02_01.html

Comment by Chris Stefan
2009-07-28 13:02:23

But do note the one mode that has 10,000 times the deaths of the others. Somehow I suspect the people slamming light rail for this man’s death would likely say he had it coming if he climbed over the barrier from the pedestrian/bike path on the I-90 bridge and got hit by a truck.

Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 17:00:36

It does also have many times the use, but yeah, by passenger mile, rail is still much safer.

 
 
Comment by joshuadf
2009-07-28 13:44:23

Also, I don’t believe those stats include suicides.

 
 
Comment by Chris
2009-07-28 13:20:35

Only 214 nationally all year? – ST was extremely unlucky to have one in 10 days then

Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 17:00:53

This isn’t part of that number. This is a suicide.

 
 
Comment by Sam
2009-07-28 19:40:10

I hope they examine the video, if there is any, before they conclude he “jumped in front of the train.” Because if they are just going by what the Link operator observed, we must remember that he could be mistaken. The person could have been trying to “beat the train.” Maybe he though he could avoid the train by running in front of it, but to the operator, it looked like he wanted to get hit, when he really didn’t.

Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 20:35:31

I don’t think there was anywhere for him to go on the other side (except the other track). My understanding is that it was pretty cut and dry.

 
Comment by Zed
2009-07-28 21:25:01

It is the victims fault, plain and simple, not the fault of the driver. He climbed over a barrier and was trespassing on the tracks. Please give up your transit operator distracted by cell phones witch hunt.

Did it occur to you that maybe they have looked at the video and that’s how they concluded he jumped in front of the train?

Comment by Sam
2009-07-28 21:44:57

[Comment edited: ad hominem]

I happen to believe that whenever there is a fatal bus or train crash, immediate drug tests should be performed, and cell phone records should be checked. If it’s found that an operator was on their cell phone at the time of the fatal crash, no matter who’s at fault, they should be fired.

Comment by Zed
2009-07-28 23:28:53

I believe those checks should be done if there is reason to believe the operator did something wrong. In this case it is pretty clear that the operator did nothing to cause this event to happen. Just because someone works for a public agency does not mean that they should be expected to give up their constitutional rights.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by ugh
2009-07-28 19:42:59

There’s a lot of sketchy/messed up people in that part of town: There’s a big rehab/meth clinic on Airport Way, and all the folks from Pioneer Square and The Jungle. This was bound to happen, and will happen again.

Gates won’t help. Even grade separation won’t help much. These people are just mentally addled. It’s sad, but it’s life.

Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 20:36:30

What could help would be better funding for services to permanently house people who can’t take care of themselves. We have programs for it, just not enough of them. Some percentage of people just need our help.

Comment by ugh
2009-07-28 21:49:16

I agree with you, Ben, but I don’t have much hope for that sort of compassion and pragmatism in contemporary American society.

 
 
 
Comment by Sam
2009-07-28 19:54:52

I also hope, but I doubt they will, get the cell phone records of the Link operator, to see if he was on a call at the time of the crash. I think whenever there’s a crash or fatality, even when it looks like the Link operator isn’t to blame, I think their cell records should be examined to make sure they weren’t distracted at the time of the crash.

Comment by Ben Schiendelman
2009-07-28 20:37:46

I’m of the opinion that if you’re on trackway, it’s always your fault. Period. I don’t care if the driver was doing ikebana.

Comment by Sam
2009-07-28 20:50:52

So you don’t think bus drivers or train operators should be drug tested or have their cell phone records examined when they are involved in a fatal accident?

Comment by lazarus
2009-07-29 07:28:11

This was a suicide — plain and simple, and the authorities have already ruled so. You seem to be trying to turn this into something that it isn’t. But, regardless of what your motives are, you can rest assured that all protocols will be followed in investigating and closing out this incident.

Bottom line? This was not an “accident”, it was a suicide. Time to move on.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by VeloBusDriver
2009-07-28 22:48:30

Any operator of a Metro coach involved in an accident that results in injury or death will be tested for drugs – regardless of fault. Positive results for drugs are relatively rare so this typically ends up being a CYA move for both Metro and the driver. I am not aware of any policy for checking cell phone records – the idea has merit provided there are guidelines to protect innocents. (Don’t hang me if somebody sends me a text message but there’s no evidence that I was actually interacting with my phone… I can’t even hear the stupid thing while I’m driving) I can’t speak to policies for Link operators but I’m sure that the rules for them are much more stringent.

Hey Sam, since you seem so gung-ho about checking for drugs and cell-phone use, would you be willing to submit to such scrutiny as a private citizen?

Comment by Matt the Engineer
2009-07-29 07:37:02

Speaking of which, shouldn’t a drug test and cell phone records search be done for every car accident that leads to injury or death? It’s not like driving a car is any safer than driving a train (much less safe, actually).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Lloyd
2009-07-30 11:25:59
(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.