<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Round-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:16:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david M</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-62327</link>
		<dc:creator>david M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-62327</guid>
		<description>The link stations are quite far apart - the Canada Line Skytrain&#039;s top speed is 80km/it runs this speed betwen station on the longer stretches. The dwell time in stations due to expected passenger volumes also slows it down.

Canada Line averages 2 minutes, 36 seconds per mile
Seattle Link averages 2 minutes, 18 seconds per mile
Skytrain&#039;s Expo line runs 17.9 miles (Waterfront to King George) in 39 minutes, an average speed of 2 minutes, 10 seconds

So yes, Canada Line is slow by comparison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The link stations are quite far apart &#8211; the Canada Line Skytrain&#8217;s top speed is 80km/it runs this speed betwen station on the longer stretches. The dwell time in stations due to expected passenger volumes also slows it down.</p>
<p>Canada Line averages 2 minutes, 36 seconds per mile<br />
Seattle Link averages 2 minutes, 18 seconds per mile<br />
Skytrain&#8217;s Expo line runs 17.9 miles (Waterfront to King George) in 39 minutes, an average speed of 2 minutes, 10 seconds</p>
<p>So yes, Canada Line is slow by comparison<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-61602</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-61602</guid>
		<description>This analysis came to pretty much the same result I did, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gBK8ygR_GgJVJ_9QEjvOcx4J8MxQD99SA4101&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;`Cash for clunkers&#039; effect on pollution? A blip&lt;/a&gt;. For $3B we&#039;re reducing the amount of gasoline used by about 1/10th of one percent. And that&#039;s assuming people won&#039;t increase the number of miles driven which is probably wrong because driving a car with better gas mileage is like getting cheaper gas. It was a bailout for the auto industry and not even a particularly good one since neither GM or Chrysler are in a position to ramp up production and even if they were the giveaway was so sweet that manufactures didn&#039;t have time to react.

I wonder how many clunkers were really trucks folks kept around for the occasional dump run or extra car driveway queen. The car that&#039;s really getting replaced, the daily driver is the five year old model that&#039;s still worth market value. Toyota was already pre-selling virtually every Prius before it even rolled of the line in Japan. With the Cash for the Clunkers disappearing fast I bet a few would be Prius buyers opted for lower mileage cars to close the deal now. Why not? With the money handed out by the government you can afford the gas on that new SUV.

It&#039;s not all bad. I can&#039;t find the statistics for the US but it&#039;s something similar to China where &lt;a href=&quot;http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmo/beijings_highpolluting_vehicle.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10% of the cars account for half of the polution&lt;/a&gt; because they tend to be worn out and poorly maintained (if it ain&#039;t broke don&#039;t fix &#039;nothin). China&#039;s phase out plan was far better in that it leverages much of the money in the form of low interest loans. For $3B we might have taken a big bite out of the worst poluters but what we got was replacement of less than half of one percent of the total vehicle fleet.

Oh well, they can always print more money and try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
This analysis came to pretty much the same result I did, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gBK8ygR_GgJVJ_9QEjvOcx4J8MxQD99SA4101" rel="nofollow">`Cash for clunkers&#8217; effect on pollution? A blip</a>. For $3B we&#8217;re reducing the amount of gasoline used by about 1/10th of one percent. And that&#8217;s assuming people won&#8217;t increase the number of miles driven which is probably wrong because driving a car with better gas mileage is like getting cheaper gas. It was a bailout for the auto industry and not even a particularly good one since neither GM or Chrysler are in a position to ramp up production and even if they were the giveaway was so sweet that manufactures didn&#8217;t have time to react.</p>
<p>I wonder how many clunkers were really trucks folks kept around for the occasional dump run or extra car driveway queen. The car that&#8217;s really getting replaced, the daily driver is the five year old model that&#8217;s still worth market value. Toyota was already pre-selling virtually every Prius before it even rolled of the line in Japan. With the Cash for the Clunkers disappearing fast I bet a few would be Prius buyers opted for lower mileage cars to close the deal now. Why not? With the money handed out by the government you can afford the gas on that new SUV.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not all bad. I can&#8217;t find the statistics for the US but it&#8217;s something similar to China where <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/kmo/beijings_highpolluting_vehicle.html" rel="nofollow">10% of the cars account for half of the polution</a> because they tend to be worn out and poorly maintained (if it ain&#8217;t broke don&#8217;t fix &#8216;nothin). China&#8217;s phase out plan was far better in that it leverages much of the money in the form of low interest loans. For $3B we might have taken a big bite out of the worst poluters but what we got was replacement of less than half of one percent of the total vehicle fleet.</p>
<p>Oh well, they can always print more money and try again.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-61575</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-61575</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference with light bulbs and cars though. The major expense for lighting your house is the electricity, not the light bulb. You can make back the difference in a cost from incandescent bulb to a fluorescent bulb in a matter of months. A huge amount of cars expensive is the, well, car. You scrap a $5000 car at 18 mph for a $15000 car @26 mph and you need to drive tens of thousands of extras miles to make up the difference. That means more traffic,etc. Plus it&#039;s energy intensive to make cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
There&#8217;s a difference with light bulbs and cars though. The major expense for lighting your house is the electricity, not the light bulb. You can make back the difference in a cost from incandescent bulb to a fluorescent bulb in a matter of months. A huge amount of cars expensive is the, well, car. You scrap a $5000 car at 18 mph for a $15000 car @26 mph and you need to drive tens of thousands of extras miles to make up the difference. That means more traffic,etc. Plus it&#8217;s energy intensive to make cars.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transit Guy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60857</link>
		<dc:creator>Transit Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60857</guid>
		<description>TOD plans in the City of Tukwila: Zilch. Nada. Nope, not here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
TOD plans in the City of Tukwila: Zilch. Nada. Nope, not here.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60305</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have no idea how politicians expect a program that destroys (im)perfectly good cars is somehow going to save the environment and make the nation wealthier.&quot;

It&#039;s a stimulus, which is something the nation needs right now.  And it does replace low-mileage cars with high-mileage cars.  The electric utilities do the same thing when they subsidize new refrigerators and florescent light bulbs; it translates to one less power plant to build.  I&#039;d prefer a more equitable stimulus rather than one which just benefits car lovers and auto factories, but anything that creates jobs and props up spending is better than nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
&#8220;I have no idea how politicians expect a program that destroys (im)perfectly good cars is somehow going to save the environment and make the nation wealthier.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a stimulus, which is something the nation needs right now.  And it does replace low-mileage cars with high-mileage cars.  The electric utilities do the same thing when they subsidize new refrigerators and florescent light bulbs; it translates to one less power plant to build.  I&#8217;d prefer a more equitable stimulus rather than one which just benefits car lovers and auto factories, but anything that creates jobs and props up spending is better than nothing.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil on qa</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60258</link>
		<dc:creator>phil on qa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60258</guid>
		<description>Maybe we could take advantage of the huge private airport parking lots across 518 on the weekends.  Weekends should be a slow time for them and they already have shuttle buses.

Parking at the Tukwila station will have more problems, as airport users will take advantage of it once Link goes to the airport.  Probably some are already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Maybe we could take advantage of the huge private airport parking lots across 518 on the weekends.  Weekends should be a slow time for them and they already have shuttle buses.</p>
<p>Parking at the Tukwila station will have more problems, as airport users will take advantage of it once Link goes to the airport.  Probably some are already.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickymse</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickymse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60257</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I saw one test train running over the new bridge crossing by the airport on Saturday and another train sitting in the end station by Richmond Centre. (In case folks aren&#039;t aware, the line splits at the end, with one running to two or three airport stations or to two Richmond city stations.) 

I wish I could have captured photos. :-( 

It&#039;s 1.5 miles exactly from Richmond Centre station to my parent&#039;s front door, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yeah, I saw one test train running over the new bridge crossing by the airport on Saturday and another train sitting in the end station by Richmond Centre. (In case folks aren&#8217;t aware, the line splits at the end, with one running to two or three airport stations or to two Richmond city stations.) </p>
<p>I wish I could have captured photos. :-( </p>
<p>It&#8217;s 1.5 miles exactly from Richmond Centre station to my parent&#8217;s front door, though!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ST Guy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60135</link>
		<dc:creator>ST Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60135</guid>
		<description>Thanks to all on this thread for NOT repeating that tired claim, that Sound Transit is responsible for the wires in question. We are a City Light customer; nothing more. We have a deal with City Light:  They don&#039;t tell us where to build our rails and stations, and we don&#039;t tell City Light where or how to install their wires. &#039;Nuf said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Thanks to all on this thread for NOT repeating that tired claim, that Sound Transit is responsible for the wires in question. We are a City Light customer; nothing more. We have a deal with City Light:  They don&#8217;t tell us where to build our rails and stations, and we don&#8217;t tell City Light where or how to install their wires. &#8216;Nuf said.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60125</link>
		<dc:creator>John C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60125</guid>
		<description>Have you forgotten about the A Line BRT? It will feed many people into the TIB station as well as SeaTac station. Let&#039;s hope Metro makes it happen.

Other P &amp; R sites should come as Link expands. I suspect the political pressure will be too great to avoid some P &amp; R lots. But, it&#039;s my hope that ALL of them will be pay lots. Free parking for cars is ridiculous. The infrastructure is too expensive to be free. Price it so it&#039;s still less expensive to park and ride. It&#039;s time to start converting all lots to pay lots, even those only fed by buses. It is a revenue stream that ST and Metro are going to have to tap to stay viable. A couple bucks a day is all I&#039;m suggesting. Phase it in.

When are American&#039;s going to start paying the full price for being an auto oriented society?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Have you forgotten about the A Line BRT? It will feed many people into the TIB station as well as SeaTac station. Let&#8217;s hope Metro makes it happen.</p>
<p>Other P &amp; R sites should come as Link expands. I suspect the political pressure will be too great to avoid some P &amp; R lots. But, it&#8217;s my hope that ALL of them will be pay lots. Free parking for cars is ridiculous. The infrastructure is too expensive to be free. Price it so it&#8217;s still less expensive to park and ride. It&#8217;s time to start converting all lots to pay lots, even those only fed by buses. It is a revenue stream that ST and Metro are going to have to tap to stay viable. A couple bucks a day is all I&#8217;m suggesting. Phase it in.</p>
<p>When are American&#8217;s going to start paying the full price for being an auto oriented society?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60120</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60120</guid>
		<description>Tukwila is more focused on the Sounder station.
http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/urbancenterplan.html

You can find info about Seatac&#039;s station area planning here:
http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/services/stationareaplanning.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Tukwila is more focused on the Sounder station.<br />
<a href="http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/urbancenterplan.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us/dcd/urbancenterplan.html</a></p>
<p>You can find info about Seatac&#8217;s station area planning here:<br />
<a href="http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/services/stationareaplanning.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ci.seatac.wa.us/services/stationareaplanning.htm</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60119</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60119</guid>
		<description>It seems like a similar thing has happened with feeder bus routes in the Valley. Now that Link is open I hear a lot of people complaining about not having any feeder bus service to the stations, but it seems like Metro is afraid to really implement that because of a few loud people screaming about changes to their bus routes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It seems like a similar thing has happened with feeder bus routes in the Valley. Now that Link is open I hear a lot of people complaining about not having any feeder bus service to the stations, but it seems like Metro is afraid to really implement that because of a few loud people screaming about changes to their bus routes.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60098</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60098</guid>
		<description>I could be a little hypersensitive about this, after the article last year in Hugeasscity that basically called us all a bunch of ungrateful idiots who don&#039;t deserve a transit station because we don&#039;t support TOD. (Which was both patronizing and untrue. In general I think folks on the Hill support upzoning and TOD around the station, but there are a few very loud voices who do not. But they don&#039;t speak for everyone.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I could be a little hypersensitive about this, after the article last year in Hugeasscity that basically called us all a bunch of ungrateful idiots who don&#8217;t deserve a transit station because we don&#8217;t support TOD. (Which was both patronizing and untrue. In general I think folks on the Hill support upzoning and TOD around the station, but there are a few very loud voices who do not. But they don&#8217;t speak for everyone.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litlnemo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60096</link>
		<dc:creator>litlnemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60096</guid>
		<description>Well, the only reason it&#039;s litlnemo and not Little Nemo is because many, many years ago, I made a user account at the University of Washington, and at the time, they had an eight-character limit for user names. So I just kept using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Well, the only reason it&#8217;s litlnemo and not Little Nemo is because many, many years ago, I made a user account at the University of Washington, and at the time, they had an eight-character limit for user names. So I just kept using it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grant</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60095</link>
		<dc:creator>grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60095</guid>
		<description>Good point - I did not mean to imply that they represent the neighborhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Good point &#8211; I did not mean to imply that they represent the neighborhood.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Niles</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60093</link>
		<dc:creator>John Niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60093</guid>
		<description>Couple of other regional transit news items I picked up today in my news scanning:

Officials in Vancouver, BC announced this afternoon (Tuesday August 4) that the Canada Line automated subway (and otherwise elevated) train line between the downtown multi-modal Waterfront Station and the YVR international airport and Richmond is opening several months early, on Monday August 17.  This is not a Skytrain extension, but somewhat similar to Skytrain. It will cause the elimination of a number of bus lines, including the 98-B-Line BRT in a parallel corridor. I recall that the construction of this line was NOT part of the Winter Olympics bid package, and NOT favored by many local officials, but rather was forced by the Provincial Government.

Thurston County&#039;s Intercity Transit received an award today from American Public Transportation Association (APTA)as being the best transit system in America in its size class. I&#039;ve occasionally used Intercity&#039;s nice express bus service between Tacoma&#039;s Freighthouse Square and the State Capitol area in Olympia, which is a joint service with Pierce Transit, as I recall.

Google for further details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Couple of other regional transit news items I picked up today in my news scanning:</p>
<p>Officials in Vancouver, BC announced this afternoon (Tuesday August 4) that the Canada Line automated subway (and otherwise elevated) train line between the downtown multi-modal Waterfront Station and the YVR international airport and Richmond is opening several months early, on Monday August 17.  This is not a Skytrain extension, but somewhat similar to Skytrain. It will cause the elimination of a number of bus lines, including the 98-B-Line BRT in a parallel corridor. I recall that the construction of this line was NOT part of the Winter Olympics bid package, and NOT favored by many local officials, but rather was forced by the Provincial Government.</p>
<p>Thurston County&#8217;s Intercity Transit received an award today from American Public Transportation Association (APTA)as being the best transit system in America in its size class. I&#8217;ve occasionally used Intercity&#8217;s nice express bus service between Tacoma&#8217;s Freighthouse Square and the State Capitol area in Olympia, which is a joint service with Pierce Transit, as I recall.</p>
<p>Google for further details.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60091</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60091</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting. And it&#039;s got about the same number of stations from downtown to the airport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
That&#8217;s interesting. And it&#8217;s got about the same number of stations from downtown to the airport.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Schiendelman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60089</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Schiendelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60089</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Transit Oriented Development. That lot is perfect for a good mixed use development. We shouldn&#039;t fill it with a garage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Sorry, Transit Oriented Development. That lot is perfect for a good mixed use development. We shouldn&#8217;t fill it with a garage.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60085</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60085</guid>
		<description>Doh! I&#039;ll fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Doh! I&#8217;ll fix it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Whittome</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60084</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whittome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60084</guid>
		<description>Andrew, bravo for saying this:
“don’t ask, just do”

I have wanting someone to say this for months now - I am sure the poles are annoying but have they been placed there purely for that purpose!  I doubt it....

Moving on....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Andrew, bravo for saying this:<br />
“don’t ask, just do”</p>
<p>I have wanting someone to say this for months now &#8211; I am sure the poles are annoying but have they been placed there purely for that purpose!  I doubt it&#8230;.</p>
<p>Moving on&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Whittome</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/04/news-round-up-21/#comment-60083</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whittome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=6994#comment-60083</guid>
		<description>I did like it because yes, William Yardley (NYT&#039;s point man for the Northwest) had a humerous take on our introspection.  Is Seattle the most democractic city on earth because everyone has their chance not only to speak once but to exercise the option of thinking again and speaking twice, or is Seattle the silliest?  Mr. Jim Ellis said it right when he suggested that every so often this great city of ours that we all love just gets it right!  Of course, not before everyone has had their say and final word - Seattle Process or Seattle priceless?

What I didn&#039;t like was the largely empty interior picture of Link they had to publish

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I did like it because yes, William Yardley (NYT&#8217;s point man for the Northwest) had a humerous take on our introspection.  Is Seattle the most democractic city on earth because everyone has their chance not only to speak once but to exercise the option of thinking again and speaking twice, or is Seattle the silliest?  Mr. Jim Ellis said it right when he suggested that every so often this great city of ours that we all love just gets it right!  Of course, not before everyone has had their say and final word &#8211; Seattle Process or Seattle priceless?</p>
<p>What I didn&#8217;t like was the largely empty interior picture of Link they had to publish</p>
<p>Tim<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 423/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-25 10:55:24 -->
