<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Link Ridership Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Swift Ridership Numbers - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-86521</link>
		<dc:creator>First Swift Ridership Numbers - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-86521</guid>
		<description>[...] talking about Link ridership, I&#8217;ve said time and time again that monthly ridership totals are basically meaningless.  We won&#8217;t have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] talking about Link ridership, I&#8217;ve said time and time again that monthly ridership totals are basically meaningless.  We won&#8217;t have [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editorial: Stand Behind Your Agency - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-71377</link>
		<dc:creator>Editorial: Stand Behind Your Agency - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-71377</guid>
		<description>[...] route in the system and is still growing.  Before there were any service changes, something like 7,000 round trips were subjectively improved, because people chose to take the train.  More would probably like the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] route in the system and is still growing.  Before there were any service changes, something like 7,000 round trips were subjectively improved, because people chose to take the train.  More would probably like the [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Ridership - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-70378</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Ridership - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-70378</guid>
		<description>[...] seen the latter phenomenon here, where the mid-August ridership numbers showed more boardings on Saturday than the average weekday.  More anecdotally, while riding the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] seen the latter phenomenon here, where the mid-August ridership numbers showed more boardings on Saturday than the average weekday.  More anecdotally, while riding the [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-66031</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-66031</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the sewer main status?  Is it tired and in need of replacement, or is it &quot;will last another 100 years&quot;?  I think that rather determines whether to leave it alone or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
What&#8217;s the sewer main status?  Is it tired and in need of replacement, or is it &#8220;will last another 100 years&#8221;?  I think that rather determines whether to leave it alone or not.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-66030</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-66030</guid>
		<description>Are you sure?  Oran&#039;s map places the BNSF under *4th* Avenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Are you sure?  Oran&#8217;s map places the BNSF under *4th* Avenue.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-65029</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-65029</guid>
		<description>Look at the design of Westlake Station, there&#039;s your hint to their prior intentions with the DSTT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Look at the design of Westlake Station, there&#8217;s your hint to their prior intentions with the DSTT.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64979</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64979</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure the lower density along 5th in Belltown is a problem. The East side of Belltown stretching to SLU isn&#039;t all that developed yet including many blocks of parking lots East of 6th. This provides a huge potential for TOD and some very dense office and residential construction near the station. On the other hand it isn&#039;t as if 5th through Belltown is in the middle of nowhere. The area is more dense than almost any area outside of downtown with a Link station. Furthermore a 5th avenue station in Belltown would be within 2 or 3 blocks of SLU.

An advantage of following 5th through Belltown is a possible station on the East Side of Seattle Center near the Gates Foundation offices and EMP. I&#039;d keep a station on the West side of the Center in Uptown too, I think the area has enough going on to warrant two stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;m not sure the lower density along 5th in Belltown is a problem. The East side of Belltown stretching to SLU isn&#8217;t all that developed yet including many blocks of parking lots East of 6th. This provides a huge potential for TOD and some very dense office and residential construction near the station. On the other hand it isn&#8217;t as if 5th through Belltown is in the middle of nowhere. The area is more dense than almost any area outside of downtown with a Link station. Furthermore a 5th avenue station in Belltown would be within 2 or 3 blocks of SLU.</p>
<p>An advantage of following 5th through Belltown is a possible station on the East Side of Seattle Center near the Gates Foundation offices and EMP. I&#8217;d keep a station on the West side of the Center in Uptown too, I think the area has enough going on to warrant two stations.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64954</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64954</guid>
		<description>For a second avenue line I think following more or less the alignment of the SMP green line South of Stewart is probably the best routing.

IOW run down 2nd and 2nd ave extension to 3rd, follow the 3rd ave ROW to South of the stadiums before swinging over to 1st.

This allows you to put a station in with a direct connection to the Sounder station and skybridge to the ID station. It also allows a transition from a tunnel to either at-grade or elevated somewhere between Jackson and Qwest Field.

I&#039;d put the Pioneer square station roughly in the vicinity of the sinking ship garage. Demolish the damn thing and make the site either a station entry plaza or TOD over a station entrance. This also allows a connection to the DSTT at Pioneer Square as well.

North of there I think you&#039;d want a station centered roughly on Pike St. This allows an entrance near the market, a connection to a possible extended Westlake mezzanine and a possible connection to University street station. At the very least entrances to these two DSTT stations would be fairly close to the north and south entrances of a 2nd Ave Pike St. station.

I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;d want another station in between Yesler and Pike, though something around Madison or Marion could serve the Ferry terminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
For a second avenue line I think following more or less the alignment of the SMP green line South of Stewart is probably the best routing.</p>
<p>IOW run down 2nd and 2nd ave extension to 3rd, follow the 3rd ave ROW to South of the stadiums before swinging over to 1st.</p>
<p>This allows you to put a station in with a direct connection to the Sounder station and skybridge to the ID station. It also allows a transition from a tunnel to either at-grade or elevated somewhere between Jackson and Qwest Field.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d put the Pioneer square station roughly in the vicinity of the sinking ship garage. Demolish the damn thing and make the site either a station entry plaza or TOD over a station entrance. This also allows a connection to the DSTT at Pioneer Square as well.</p>
<p>North of there I think you&#8217;d want a station centered roughly on Pike St. This allows an entrance near the market, a connection to a possible extended Westlake mezzanine and a possible connection to University street station. At the very least entrances to these two DSTT stations would be fairly close to the north and south entrances of a 2nd Ave Pike St. station.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if you&#8217;d want another station in between Yesler and Pike, though something around Madison or Marion could serve the Ferry terminal.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazarus</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64945</link>
		<dc:creator>lazarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64945</guid>
		<description>I made some comments to Oran&#039;s post and map in the above comments -- I won&#039;t repost them here, but a 2nd Ave routing does have some advantages over a 5th Ave routing (and ditto the other way around).

I see the main problem with the 2nd Ave route to be dealing with that 100 year old brick sewer main that is buried under 2nd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I made some comments to Oran&#8217;s post and map in the above comments &#8212; I won&#8217;t repost them here, but a 2nd Ave routing does have some advantages over a 5th Ave routing (and ditto the other way around).</p>
<p>I see the main problem with the 2nd Ave route to be dealing with that 100 year old brick sewer main that is buried under 2nd.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazarus</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64941</link>
		<dc:creator>lazarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64941</guid>
		<description>Oran,

Great map, and I wish I could Photoshop it because I have a few routing suggestions for your “Green Line”.

First, what I see as the problems:

1) Having only one transfer point between the Green and Blue lines will force everyone to transfer at the same station pair.  As ridership builds, this has the potential to overload these stations.

2) Passengers transferring to the Green Line from Sounder at KSS are forced to first transfer to the Blue Line at KSS and then transfer to the Green Line at University.

3) Transitioning from 2nd to 1st Aves mid block would require tunneling under some fairly large buildings in marginal soil conditions.

Now my suggested routing mods:

1) Keep the Green Line on 2nd Ave until it gets to KSS, then cut through the KSS passenger drop-off area and then diagonally across the North Parking lot and back to 1st Ave.

2) Move your station at Pioneer Square over onto 2nd Ave in the vicinity of Cherry St.

3) Add a station at KSS under the drop-off area and/or the North Parking lot.

I see the advantages of the mods as these:

1) Having two transfer station pairs between the Green and Blue lines will split the transfer load roughly in half.  This level loading will reduce station congestion and improve utility.

2) Adding a station at KSS will facilitate Sounder transfers to the Green Line (more level loading and improved utility)

3) Transitioning from 2nd to 1st Aves under the un-built triangular area in front of Salumi’s and then via the North Lot would eliminate most issues with tunneling under large buildings.

Of course having a station nearer to Salumi’s is a huge advantage, but that might just be my stomach speaking – time to go get some lunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Oran,</p>
<p>Great map, and I wish I could Photoshop it because I have a few routing suggestions for your “Green Line”.</p>
<p>First, what I see as the problems:</p>
<p>1) Having only one transfer point between the Green and Blue lines will force everyone to transfer at the same station pair.  As ridership builds, this has the potential to overload these stations.</p>
<p>2) Passengers transferring to the Green Line from Sounder at KSS are forced to first transfer to the Blue Line at KSS and then transfer to the Green Line at University.</p>
<p>3) Transitioning from 2nd to 1st Aves mid block would require tunneling under some fairly large buildings in marginal soil conditions.</p>
<p>Now my suggested routing mods:</p>
<p>1) Keep the Green Line on 2nd Ave until it gets to KSS, then cut through the KSS passenger drop-off area and then diagonally across the North Parking lot and back to 1st Ave.</p>
<p>2) Move your station at Pioneer Square over onto 2nd Ave in the vicinity of Cherry St.</p>
<p>3) Add a station at KSS under the drop-off area and/or the North Parking lot.</p>
<p>I see the advantages of the mods as these:</p>
<p>1) Having two transfer station pairs between the Green and Blue lines will split the transfer load roughly in half.  This level loading will reduce station congestion and improve utility.</p>
<p>2) Adding a station at KSS will facilitate Sounder transfers to the Green Line (more level loading and improved utility)</p>
<p>3) Transitioning from 2nd to 1st Aves under the un-built triangular area in front of Salumi’s and then via the North Lot would eliminate most issues with tunneling under large buildings.</p>
<p>Of course having a station nearer to Salumi’s is a huge advantage, but that might just be my stomach speaking – time to go get some lunch.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64939</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64939</guid>
		<description>Ah ha. I knew there was something as I&#039;ve seen figures in the 200+ million and then lower numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Ah ha. I knew there was something as I&#8217;ve seen figures in the 200+ million and then lower numbers.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64938</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64938</guid>
		<description>But none of the bus service in North King is oriented to serve North King residents -- otherwise the 522 would have more stops in Lake City, the 545 would run over Capitol Hill, the 510 series would detour through the U-District or at least stop at freeway stops during rush hours, etc.  

North King chose rail over buses, and that&#039;s where our money goes, as it should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
But none of the bus service in North King is oriented to serve North King residents &#8212; otherwise the 522 would have more stops in Lake City, the 545 would run over Capitol Hill, the 510 series would detour through the U-District or at least stop at freeway stops during rush hours, etc.  </p>
<p>North King chose rail over buses, and that&#8217;s where our money goes, as it should.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64911</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64911</guid>
		<description>I saw an old report (from maybe 5 years ago?) done for ST/WSDOT and some other agencies that looked at potential alignments for a new transit tunnel in downtown.  The alignment that was preferred out of that process was under 5th, with stations next to the ID station, at 5th and Columbia, and under Westlake.  

I didn&#039;t look at it long enough to see why they were doing the study or what their assumptions were.  It was in a pile of stuff getting tossed.  I wish I had snagged it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I saw an old report (from maybe 5 years ago?) done for ST/WSDOT and some other agencies that looked at potential alignments for a new transit tunnel in downtown.  The alignment that was preferred out of that process was under 5th, with stations next to the ID station, at 5th and Columbia, and under Westlake.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t look at it long enough to see why they were doing the study or what their assumptions were.  It was in a pile of stuff getting tossed.  I wish I had snagged it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowystar</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64902</link>
		<dc:creator>snowystar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64902</guid>
		<description>Those are two different measurements.
The figure for 179M is for revenue riders (linked trips). The number for boardings (unlinked trips) is over 300M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Those are two different measurements.<br />
The figure for 179M is for revenue riders (linked trips). The number for boardings (unlinked trips) is over 300M.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64878</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64878</guid>
		<description>Rail under 2nd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Rail under 2nd!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64862</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64862</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Zed. An error I just found in the map is the vertical positioning of the tunnels. The DSTT actually goes under the BNSF tunnel between Pioneer Square and International District, not over it. And SR 99 definitely doesn&#039;t go under the tracks.

I don&#039;t know but University Street station has an entrance under Benaroya Hall that&#039;s pretty visible from 2nd Avenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Thanks, Zed. An error I just found in the map is the vertical positioning of the tunnels. The DSTT actually goes under the BNSF tunnel between Pioneer Square and International District, not over it. And SR 99 definitely doesn&#8217;t go under the tracks.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know but University Street station has an entrance under Benaroya Hall that&#8217;s pretty visible from 2nd Avenue.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64859</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64859</guid>
		<description>Blew right by it - and I NEVER miss Oran&#039;s maps.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Blew right by it &#8211; and I NEVER miss Oran&#8217;s maps.  Thanks!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64847</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64847</guid>
		<description>Lloyd, Oran posted a very nice map of the BNSF tunnel in a comment above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Lloyd, Oran posted a very nice map of the BNSF tunnel in a comment above.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64846</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64846</guid>
		<description>Are you sure, Ben?  BNSF tunnel turns a bit west (left) northbound not too far in from South Portal but after it passes over the transit tunnel, and then the Transit Tunnel passes above the railroad between PioSq Sta and University Street Sta at maybe 3rd and Madison or so. (I had a map from when the bus tunnel was built but can&#039;t find it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Are you sure, Ben?  BNSF tunnel turns a bit west (left) northbound not too far in from South Portal but after it passes over the transit tunnel, and then the Transit Tunnel passes above the railroad between PioSq Sta and University Street Sta at maybe 3rd and Madison or so. (I had a map from when the bus tunnel was built but can&#8217;t find it).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aw</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/08/26/new-link-ridership-numbers/#comment-64845</link>
		<dc:creator>aw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=7556#comment-64845</guid>
		<description>North King gets bus service, it ought to pay for it.  If I understand correctly, when there&#039;s an inter-regional bus that doesn&#039;t go to Seattle, the operational cost is shared between the sub-areas.

The problem is, when you take the capital costs of Central Link, U Link and North Link, there isn&#039;t any budget left to pay for buses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
North King gets bus service, it ought to pay for it.  If I understand correctly, when there&#8217;s an inter-regional bus that doesn&#8217;t go to Seattle, the operational cost is shared between the sub-areas.</p>
<p>The problem is, when you take the capital costs of Central Link, U Link and North Link, there isn&#8217;t any budget left to pay for buses.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 416/431 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-13 02:24:26 -->
