<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle &#8211; Leavenworth $40 R/T!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:14:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konrad Roeder</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-73419</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad Roeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-73419</guid>
		<description>Some guy nominated the Leavenworth (Amtrak Thruway Motorcoach station) Wikipedia page for deletion.  He contends the bus stop is not notable.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a good idea since LEA - the bus stop is located at the quickstop 76 and LWA - the new train station is located on the other side of town up on the hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Some guy nominated the Leavenworth (Amtrak Thruway Motorcoach station) Wikipedia page for deletion.  He contends the bus stop is not notable.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a good idea since LEA &#8211; the bus stop is located at the quickstop 76 and LWA &#8211; the new train station is located on the other side of town up on the hill.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konrad Roeder</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-72983</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad Roeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-72983</guid>
		<description>For a round trip to Leavenworth and back consider the following:

8 Empire Builder Seattle, WA (SEA)
4:40 pm 

Leavenworth, WA (LWA)
8:00 pm
3h 20m

-===-

With three possible return trips:

1) 7 Empire Builder Leavenworth, WA (LWA)
6:08 am

11-OCT-09 	Seattle, WA
  (SEA)

4h 17m


2) Leavenworth, WA - Bus Stop (LEV)
9:55 am

Seattle, WA (SEA)
1:05 pm

3h 10m 	
	

3) Leavenworth, WA - Bus Stop (LEV)
1:10 pm

Seattle, WA (SEA)
4:45 pm

3h 35m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
For a round trip to Leavenworth and back consider the following:</p>
<p>8 Empire Builder Seattle, WA (SEA)<br />
4:40 pm </p>
<p>Leavenworth, WA (LWA)<br />
8:00 pm<br />
3h 20m</p>
<p>-===-</p>
<p>With three possible return trips:</p>
<p>1) 7 Empire Builder Leavenworth, WA (LWA)<br />
6:08 am</p>
<p>11-OCT-09 	Seattle, WA<br />
  (SEA)</p>
<p>4h 17m</p>
<p>2) Leavenworth, WA &#8211; Bus Stop (LEV)<br />
9:55 am</p>
<p>Seattle, WA (SEA)<br />
1:05 pm</p>
<p>3h 10m 	</p>
<p>3) Leavenworth, WA &#8211; Bus Stop (LEV)<br />
1:10 pm</p>
<p>Seattle, WA (SEA)<br />
4:45 pm</p>
<p>3h 35m<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Tooley</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70781</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Tooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70781</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting for the Stevens Pass ski/hike tunnel station!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;m still waiting for the Stevens Pass ski/hike tunnel station!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cusick</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cusick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70749</guid>
		<description>&quot;Passengers boarding the Empire Builder in Seattle for Seattle are enduring a marathon journey that very few airline passengers would ever consider.&quot;

You&#039;re comparing apples to oranges, since one takes airline flights for their ability to cover long distances quickly, although I would consider being shoe-horned into an airline seat for more than 3 hours a &#039;marathon journey&#039;

&quot;Add in the cumulative delay for freight traffic in that shared corridor and those who do go Amtrak vow never to do so again. I know I did after a 22 hour trip from Seattle to Oakland was 5 hours late.&quot;

You should compare train travel to driving the same route, well at least the same point to point destinations.

Granted the train takes a bit longer than driving in many cases (your Seattle - Oakland trip is approximately a 14 hour drive (I added meal and bathroom breaks)), but nothing bad happens if you drift off to sleep, read, text message (assuming nearby cell towers), etc. during the journey.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
&#8220;Passengers boarding the Empire Builder in Seattle for Seattle are enduring a marathon journey that very few airline passengers would ever consider.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re comparing apples to oranges, since one takes airline flights for their ability to cover long distances quickly, although I would consider being shoe-horned into an airline seat for more than 3 hours a &#8216;marathon journey&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;Add in the cumulative delay for freight traffic in that shared corridor and those who do go Amtrak vow never to do so again. I know I did after a 22 hour trip from Seattle to Oakland was 5 hours late.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should compare train travel to driving the same route, well at least the same point to point destinations.</p>
<p>Granted the train takes a bit longer than driving in many cases (your Seattle &#8211; Oakland trip is approximately a 14 hour drive (I added meal and bathroom breaks)), but nothing bad happens if you drift off to sleep, read, text message (assuming nearby cell towers), etc. during the journey.</p>
<p>Jim<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cusick</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cusick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70697</guid>
		<description>litlnemo,

    You can always take the afternoon bus (contracted by Amtrak), back to Everett or Seattle. (It doesn&#039;t stop in Edmonds, though). 

    Unless you hate the bus.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
litlnemo,</p>
<p>    You can always take the afternoon bus (contracted by Amtrak), back to Everett or Seattle. (It doesn&#8217;t stop in Edmonds, though). </p>
<p>    Unless you hate the bus.</p>
<p>Jim<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cusick</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cusick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70696</guid>
		<description>Justin,

    Try this website: http://www.aaasouth.com/auto_cost_calculator.asp

I plugged in numbers that fit for my 84 4x4 S10. I only mention that it&#039;s a 4x4, because those vehicles tend to not fall off the books completely like other generic cars I&#039;ve owned. (i.e. NO trade-in value)

I put in numbers that fit my spending (and savings on labor costs) with this vehicle. 

I can get the per-mile cost down to about 20 cents per mile. That is competitive with the cost of a R/T Amtrak ticket for one person.
You are correct, when you carry more people in your vehicle, the cost of driving vs. the cost of train tickets becomes a wash. Generally, four people per car is about where it&#039;s better to drive, unless you&#039;re the one always driving, I suppose. (using .50 mile)

However, the costs for my example above are for a vehicle that I would call... austere.

If your vehicle doesn&#039;t have zero value after $200k, to keep the &#039;residual value&#039; high, your maintenance costs go way up, because you have to perform major repairs to keep it in &#039;like new&#039; condition.

And be thankful when you drive over the passes that the roads aren&#039;t privately owned. You are driving on highly subsidized roadways. And no, the gas tax you pay (per mile=.02) along with all the other users don&#039;t come close to paying for the building of (amortizing the cost over the lifespan of the highways), and the maintenance (especially during the winter) of those roads.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Justin,</p>
<p>    Try this website: <a href="http://www.aaasouth.com/auto_cost_calculator.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.aaasouth.com/auto_cost_calculator.asp</a></p>
<p>I plugged in numbers that fit for my 84 4&#215;4 S10. I only mention that it&#8217;s a 4&#215;4, because those vehicles tend to not fall off the books completely like other generic cars I&#8217;ve owned. (i.e. NO trade-in value)</p>
<p>I put in numbers that fit my spending (and savings on labor costs) with this vehicle. </p>
<p>I can get the per-mile cost down to about 20 cents per mile. That is competitive with the cost of a R/T Amtrak ticket for one person.<br />
You are correct, when you carry more people in your vehicle, the cost of driving vs. the cost of train tickets becomes a wash. Generally, four people per car is about where it&#8217;s better to drive, unless you&#8217;re the one always driving, I suppose. (using .50 mile)</p>
<p>However, the costs for my example above are for a vehicle that I would call&#8230; austere.</p>
<p>If your vehicle doesn&#8217;t have zero value after $200k, to keep the &#8216;residual value&#8217; high, your maintenance costs go way up, because you have to perform major repairs to keep it in &#8216;like new&#8217; condition.</p>
<p>And be thankful when you drive over the passes that the roads aren&#8217;t privately owned. You are driving on highly subsidized roadways. And no, the gas tax you pay (per mile=.02) along with all the other users don&#8217;t come close to paying for the building of (amortizing the cost over the lifespan of the highways), and the maintenance (especially during the winter) of those roads.</p>
<p>Jim<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicadministrator</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70597</link>
		<dc:creator>publicadministrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70597</guid>
		<description>I understand the Seattle/Spokane is a segment of a larger run. My curiosity is whether Amtrak should schedule and market its service as an alternative to driving to weekend destinations between those hubs where considerable interstate vehicular travel already exists.

Isn&#039;t there considerable ridership and profit to be gained from scheduling around weekend trips between Seattle/Spokane. Besides week day depatures could be scheduled for daytime viewing of the mountains.

Passengers boarding the Empire Builder in Seattle for Seattle are enduring a marathon journey that very few airline passengers would ever consider. Add in the cumulative delay for freight traffic in that shared corridor and those who do go Amtrak vow never to do so again. I know I did after a 22 hour trip from Seattle to Oakland was 5 hours late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I understand the Seattle/Spokane is a segment of a larger run. My curiosity is whether Amtrak should schedule and market its service as an alternative to driving to weekend destinations between those hubs where considerable interstate vehicular travel already exists.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t there considerable ridership and profit to be gained from scheduling around weekend trips between Seattle/Spokane. Besides week day depatures could be scheduled for daytime viewing of the mountains.</p>
<p>Passengers boarding the Empire Builder in Seattle for Seattle are enduring a marathon journey that very few airline passengers would ever consider. Add in the cumulative delay for freight traffic in that shared corridor and those who do go Amtrak vow never to do so again. I know I did after a 22 hour trip from Seattle to Oakland was 5 hours late.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70569</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70569</guid>
		<description>I know what you are getting at I just don&#039;t agree.  first you can make the numbers anything you want.  my car costs 12k used, my depreciation curve is much less then your example.  your curve assumes a zero dollar amount for the car after 200k.  my tires last 50k miles, a 240 mile trip is not a big cost.  my insurance is not mileage based.  anyways my point is that saving those 240 miles from my car costs much less than taking the train.  Add in taking 3 people up and the numbers just get terrible for the train.

i love transit but unless I could give up our family&#039;s one car it just does not pencil out.  Also once you get there we always go hiking... need a car for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I know what you are getting at I just don&#8217;t agree.  first you can make the numbers anything you want.  my car costs 12k used, my depreciation curve is much less then your example.  your curve assumes a zero dollar amount for the car after 200k.  my tires last 50k miles, a 240 mile trip is not a big cost.  my insurance is not mileage based.  anyways my point is that saving those 240 miles from my car costs much less than taking the train.  Add in taking 3 people up and the numbers just get terrible for the train.</p>
<p>i love transit but unless I could give up our family&#8217;s one car it just does not pencil out.  Also once you get there we always go hiking&#8230; need a car for that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cusick</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70559</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cusick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70559</guid>
		<description>I am eternally fascinated by those who only look at the cost of gas as the total cost of driving.

Having been a gearhead all my life, (and saving big bucks because I can do most all the work myself,) I frankly don&#039;t know why the cost of driving goes over peoples heads!?

AAA currently puts the per mile cost at somewhere around 58 cents.

Lets make it real simple, 50 cents per mile is the cost of driving. 
Plain and simple.

Leavenworth is about 120 miles away from Seattle.

Total round trip cost would be $120.00 if you drive your car.

Mr Welch (below) can bring his wife and daughter along &#039;for no extra cost&#039; because he&#039;s already spending $120.00 round trip to drive himself.

I still don&#039;t get how people miss that. 

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I am eternally fascinated by those who only look at the cost of gas as the total cost of driving.</p>
<p>Having been a gearhead all my life, (and saving big bucks because I can do most all the work myself,) I frankly don&#8217;t know why the cost of driving goes over peoples heads!?</p>
<p>AAA currently puts the per mile cost at somewhere around 58 cents.</p>
<p>Lets make it real simple, 50 cents per mile is the cost of driving.<br />
Plain and simple.</p>
<p>Leavenworth is about 120 miles away from Seattle.</p>
<p>Total round trip cost would be $120.00 if you drive your car.</p>
<p>Mr Welch (below) can bring his wife and daughter along &#8216;for no extra cost&#8217; because he&#8217;s already spending $120.00 round trip to drive himself.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t get how people miss that. </p>
<p>Jim<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H. Duke</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70557</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H. Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70557</guid>
		<description>The Seattle/Spokane run is of course but a small part of the Seattle/Chicago Empire Builder route.  Along its length there are other constraints, so it&#039;s not like it would necessarily be optimized for Seattle/Spokane trips.

In this specific case, I could be wrong, but I believe the desire is for the trip through the Montana Rockies to be during daylight hours, for reasons that should be obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The Seattle/Spokane run is of course but a small part of the Seattle/Chicago Empire Builder route.  Along its length there are other constraints, so it&#8217;s not like it would necessarily be optimized for Seattle/Spokane trips.</p>
<p>In this specific case, I could be wrong, but I believe the desire is for the trip through the Montana Rockies to be during daylight hours, for reasons that should be obvious.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicadministrator</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70553</link>
		<dc:creator>publicadministrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70553</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d second that plea for a Seattle/Spokane train service with reasonably timed departures and arrivals. What I never understood is why Amtrak doesn&#039;t schedule and market train travel as an alternative to driving for weekend travel. 

There are many of us willing to leave the car at home for a weekend trip to Vancouver, Portland or Spokane. But to get a suitable number of passengers to make that leap Amtrak needs to meet 2 out of 3 conditions: reasonable departure times; reliable on time performance; and ticket cost commensurate with the liberation from driving duty balanced with perceived loss of independence and convenience.  So far only the recent addtional train to Vancouver comes close to filling that bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;d second that plea for a Seattle/Spokane train service with reasonably timed departures and arrivals. What I never understood is why Amtrak doesn&#8217;t schedule and market train travel as an alternative to driving for weekend travel. </p>
<p>There are many of us willing to leave the car at home for a weekend trip to Vancouver, Portland or Spokane. But to get a suitable number of passengers to make that leap Amtrak needs to meet 2 out of 3 conditions: reasonable departure times; reliable on time performance; and ticket cost commensurate with the liberation from driving duty balanced with perceived loss of independence and convenience.  So far only the recent addtional train to Vancouver comes close to filling that bill.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70552</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70552</guid>
		<description>What Josh is saying is that your view of costs is wrong.  Say you paid $25k for your car and it will last 200k miles.  You&#039;ve just used up $30 in the capital cost of your car.  And let&#039;s say there&#039;s a $500 repair every 30k miles.  That&#039;s another $4.  Another $2 for tires.  So far that&#039;s $50, not assuming such trips add to your insurance (mine is roughly mileage-based).  Add in the potential of an injury or death and related costs from a collision...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
What Josh is saying is that your view of costs is wrong.  Say you paid $25k for your car and it will last 200k miles.  You&#8217;ve just used up $30 in the capital cost of your car.  And let&#8217;s say there&#8217;s a $500 repair every 30k miles.  That&#8217;s another $4.  Another $2 for tires.  So far that&#8217;s $50, not assuming such trips add to your insurance (mine is roughly mileage-based).  Add in the potential of an injury or death and related costs from a collision&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleci</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70532</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70532</guid>
		<description>Since the Trailways bus is an Amtrak thruway bus, you can take the train on Friday afternoon and return on the bus Sunday afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Since the Trailways bus is an Amtrak thruway bus, you can take the train on Friday afternoon and return on the bus Sunday afternoon.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70494</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70494</guid>
		<description>Josh I&#039;m not getting your point, so you are saying $80 is a good deal compared to $14 in gas?  They already have to pay for the capital costs of the car, so it&#039;s really just gas and 240 miles closer to a repair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Josh I&#8217;m not getting your point, so you are saying $80 is a good deal compared to $14 in gas?  They already have to pay for the capital costs of the car, so it&#8217;s really just gas and 240 miles closer to a repair.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70465</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70465</guid>
		<description>Actually you can get a family discount on Amtrak, but anyway as I posted above you are only looking at the gas costs. Those few hundred extra miles mean an earlier oil change, wear on tires, depreciation due to mileage, etc. Many large organizations including the US government and AAA have estimated this total cost per mile.

Obviously driving a car instead of taking the train has potential advantages like side trips, but trains have advantages as well. For example, it&#039;s easier to enjoy the scenery on a train. Pick whichever works for you, but Amtrak is not ripping you off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Actually you can get a family discount on Amtrak, but anyway as I posted above you are only looking at the gas costs. Those few hundred extra miles mean an earlier oil change, wear on tires, depreciation due to mileage, etc. Many large organizations including the US government and AAA have estimated this total cost per mile.</p>
<p>Obviously driving a car instead of taking the train has potential advantages like side trips, but trains have advantages as well. For example, it&#8217;s easier to enjoy the scenery on a train. Pick whichever works for you, but Amtrak is not ripping you off.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70462</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70462</guid>
		<description>$20 one way is a pretty reasonable price for the train. I took the Trailways bus back from Leavenworth last year. Just from Leavenworth to Everett was $24. The hours of operation are crappy but the price is fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
$20 one way is a pretty reasonable price for the train. I took the Trailways bus back from Leavenworth last year. Just from Leavenworth to Everett was $24. The hours of operation are crappy but the price is fair.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70458</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70458</guid>
		<description>Are you sure? It&#039;s about 120mi on Hwy 2 (more via I-90). US GSA currently pays $0.55/mile, so that&#039;s $66... each way. Looks like just the gas would be about $7 each way:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/Feg/noframes/24882.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Are you sure? It&#8217;s about 120mi on Hwy 2 (more via I-90). US GSA currently pays $0.55/mile, so that&#8217;s $66&#8230; each way. Looks like just the gas would be about $7 each way:<br />
<a href="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/Feg/noframes/24882.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.fueleconomy.gov/Feg/noframes/24882.shtml</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70456</guid>
		<description>Oh - and can take my wife and daughter along too at no extra cost.  Amtrak would make that $120.00.  Screw that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Oh &#8211; and can take my wife and daughter along too at no extra cost.  Amtrak would make that $120.00.  Screw that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70455</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70455</guid>
		<description>I can drive there and back for half that, and get in side trip to Lake Wenatchee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I can drive there and back for half that, and get in side trip to Lake Wenatchee.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seattle – Leavenworth $40 R/T! &#8211; Seattle Transit Blog &#124; Seattle News on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/09/24/seattle-leavenworth-40-rt/#comment-70435</link>
		<dc:creator>Seattle – Leavenworth $40 R/T! &#8211; Seattle Transit Blog &#124; Seattle News on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8109#comment-70435</guid>
		<description>[...] See the article here: Seattle – Leavenworth $40 R/T! &#8211; Seattle Transit Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] See the article here: Seattle – Leavenworth $40 R/T! &#8211; Seattle Transit Blog [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 423/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-25 13:21:31 -->
