<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting to Light Rail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:55:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A New Seahawks Parking Option - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-94096</link>
		<dc:creator>A New Seahawks Parking Option - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-94096</guid>
		<description>[...] overflows, this is a good bet if you don&#8217;t want to drive into the Rainier Valley and park at one of many private lots, or simply park on the street for free.  As no media outlet but this one has spent any effort on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] overflows, this is a good bet if you don&#8217;t want to drive into the Rainier Valley and park at one of many private lots, or simply park on the street for free.  As no media outlet but this one has spent any effort on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H. Duke</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-72061</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H. Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-72061</guid>
		<description>Dente,

You keep accusing me of a one-to-one mapping of 50 trips to 34 trips, and that&#039;s just not what I&#039;m saying at all.  The 50 died for lots of reasons, not just because of the 34 but because Southeast Seattleites prioritized other things.

Your specific point at the start of this was that there should be higher peak frequency on the 39.  I&#039;ll agree that the 34 isn&#039;t enough hours to get the 39 to 15 minute headways over the entire peak period, but they are peak trips that serve those neighborhoods and go to the same place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dente,</p>
<p>You keep accusing me of a one-to-one mapping of 50 trips to 34 trips, and that&#8217;s just not what I&#8217;m saying at all.  The 50 died for lots of reasons, not just because of the 34 but because Southeast Seattleites prioritized other things.</p>
<p>Your specific point at the start of this was that there should be higher peak frequency on the 39.  I&#8217;ll agree that the 34 isn&#8217;t enough hours to get the 39 to 15 minute headways over the entire peak period, but they are peak trips that serve those neighborhoods and go to the same place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dente</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71989</link>
		<dc:creator>Dente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71989</guid>
		<description>Well, now we&#039;re getting somewhere.  You&#039;re saying keeping the 34 is why there aren&#039;t more peak trips.  

Let&#039;s do the math.  The 34 has a total of 6 runs:  three one-way runs in AM during a 2-hr period and three in PM during a 2-hr period.

By contrast, the #50 with 15 minute headways during same periods would have been 32 runs:  4 one-way runs hour, two ways, for two hours = 16 in AM peak, and same in PM peak.

If the #50 had been on only 1/2 headways (and I agree they dangled the 15 min headways like a carrot without a promise), that would have been 16 runs.    

So tell me again what your point is?  How did 6 runs displace 16 runs of roughly equal length?  And the decision to bust the only E-W route serving Columbia City station to 45 minute headways was caused by what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now we&#8217;re getting somewhere.  You&#8217;re saying keeping the 34 is why there aren&#8217;t more peak trips.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s do the math.  The 34 has a total of 6 runs:  three one-way runs in AM during a 2-hr period and three in PM during a 2-hr period.</p>
<p>By contrast, the #50 with 15 minute headways during same periods would have been 32 runs:  4 one-way runs hour, two ways, for two hours = 16 in AM peak, and same in PM peak.</p>
<p>If the #50 had been on only 1/2 headways (and I agree they dangled the 15 min headways like a carrot without a promise), that would have been 16 runs.    </p>
<p>So tell me again what your point is?  How did 6 runs displace 16 runs of roughly equal length?  And the decision to bust the only E-W route serving Columbia City station to 45 minute headways was caused by what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71937</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71937</guid>
		<description>Still, it&#039;s commodity technology. A plain RFID chip like Wal-Mart uses is 5c or 25c in bulk. A very simple microprocessor and a tiny amount of memory. DVD players and digital watches with a whole lot more than that are only $20. Because most of the cost is in the design, then you can stamp them out for very little. That&#039;s why TVs acquired a ridiculous number of features nobody uses after they went fully digital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, it&#8217;s commodity technology. A plain RFID chip like Wal-Mart uses is 5c or 25c in bulk. A very simple microprocessor and a tiny amount of memory. DVD players and digital watches with a whole lot more than that are only $20. Because most of the cost is in the design, then you can stamp them out for very little. That&#8217;s why TVs acquired a ridiculous number of features nobody uses after they went fully digital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwen c.</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71889</link>
		<dc:creator>gwen c.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71889</guid>
		<description>They are sturdy enough to kinda scream &quot;Don&#039;t toss me.&quot;

I have to hand them that in that the card is beefy and rigid. The TransLink cards in the Bay Area and my Octopus card both are much more flimsy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are sturdy enough to kinda scream &#8220;Don&#8217;t toss me.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have to hand them that in that the card is beefy and rigid. The TransLink cards in the Bay Area and my Octopus card both are much more flimsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwen c.</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71888</link>
		<dc:creator>gwen c.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71888</guid>
		<description>I suppose it&#039;s sheer coincidence that it happens only with certain drivers, then?  I will accept it might be something about the trolleybuses, but the 49 and 44 don&#039;t seem quite so plagued with this problem.

And whether or not they&#039;ve instructed the driver to take an ORCA card as a &quot;flash pass,&quot; most drivers have no problem with that. As with Metro in general, 95% of the bus operators are bloody awesome. The 10/12 doesn&#039;t have a bad driver on the route, but it&#039;s an inconveniently long walk hauling 50 pounds of books. 522, 64, 372, 65, 22...none of these drivers have any issues with ORCA or in general. My 64 drivers are the cream of the transit employee crop every time. I know, and i assume from the link that you provide, that you get that driving the 3/4 has to be living hell mostly because of much of the populace on the route. I get that. What i don&#039;t get is what leads a driver to shake me down for seven quarters after i&#039;ve paid 72 bucks for a damn pass.  

I cannot risk dealing with an issue with a driver on a bus that takes me to school; if someone&#039;s gonna threaten to call the cops, i&#039;m going to cough up $1.75, thank you very much. This is especially annoying after the same driver has let 10 people slide without paying four stops beforehand.  It is handy to know it can&#039;t be deliberately set not to work, but it doesn&#039;t excuse the behavior.

I am quite, quite aware that there are some issues involving the sort of imposition that ORCA is on drivers. It&#039;s another damn thing to worry about,  with more buttons, along with the bike racks, lift your handset for an important message yet again, transfer fraud, and violent bus crazies and  people who can quite afford fare trying to slide on it. My mom was a Tacoma Transit driver back in the day, and i&#039;m not numb to the plight of the bus driver.   The problem is that taking these issues out on passengers trying to use it...that&#039;s not really all that mature or progressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it&#8217;s sheer coincidence that it happens only with certain drivers, then?  I will accept it might be something about the trolleybuses, but the 49 and 44 don&#8217;t seem quite so plagued with this problem.</p>
<p>And whether or not they&#8217;ve instructed the driver to take an ORCA card as a &#8220;flash pass,&#8221; most drivers have no problem with that. As with Metro in general, 95% of the bus operators are bloody awesome. The 10/12 doesn&#8217;t have a bad driver on the route, but it&#8217;s an inconveniently long walk hauling 50 pounds of books. 522, 64, 372, 65, 22&#8230;none of these drivers have any issues with ORCA or in general. My 64 drivers are the cream of the transit employee crop every time. I know, and i assume from the link that you provide, that you get that driving the 3/4 has to be living hell mostly because of much of the populace on the route. I get that. What i don&#8217;t get is what leads a driver to shake me down for seven quarters after i&#8217;ve paid 72 bucks for a damn pass.  </p>
<p>I cannot risk dealing with an issue with a driver on a bus that takes me to school; if someone&#8217;s gonna threaten to call the cops, i&#8217;m going to cough up $1.75, thank you very much. This is especially annoying after the same driver has let 10 people slide without paying four stops beforehand.  It is handy to know it can&#8217;t be deliberately set not to work, but it doesn&#8217;t excuse the behavior.</p>
<p>I am quite, quite aware that there are some issues involving the sort of imposition that ORCA is on drivers. It&#8217;s another damn thing to worry about,  with more buttons, along with the bike racks, lift your handset for an important message yet again, transfer fraud, and violent bus crazies and  people who can quite afford fare trying to slide on it. My mom was a Tacoma Transit driver back in the day, and i&#8217;m not numb to the plight of the bus driver.   The problem is that taking these issues out on passengers trying to use it&#8230;that&#8217;s not really all that mature or progressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71877</link>
		<dc:creator>Milo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71877</guid>
		<description>I drive from Leschi to Mt. Baker Station.  Much nicer than the 27!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drive from Leschi to Mt. Baker Station.  Much nicer than the 27!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71870</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71870</guid>
		<description>I heard an agency/ORCA rep say it&#039;s to discourage the cards from being treated as disposable. I would hate to see ORCA cards as litter but at least they&#039;re reusable if someone picks them up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard an agency/ORCA rep say it&#8217;s to discourage the cards from being treated as disposable. I would hate to see ORCA cards as litter but at least they&#8217;re reusable if someone picks them up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71864</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71864</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what the rationale for charging for the ORCA cards is - I would like to see some numbers on the cost of administration of ORCA vs. the cost of administration of the existing pass/cash system.  My guess is that ultimately there&#039;s a savings, and that the base hardware cost of producing the ORCA card pays for itself.

Keep the cards free, otherwise there&#039;s a fundamental disincentive (however small us independently wealthy folks see it is) to use ORCA over alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the rationale for charging for the ORCA cards is &#8211; I would like to see some numbers on the cost of administration of ORCA vs. the cost of administration of the existing pass/cash system.  My guess is that ultimately there&#8217;s a savings, and that the base hardware cost of producing the ORCA card pays for itself.</p>
<p>Keep the cards free, otherwise there&#8217;s a fundamental disincentive (however small us independently wealthy folks see it is) to use ORCA over alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Welch</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71863</guid>
		<description>gwen c.

There is no way that a driver can set the ORCA system to &quot;Out of Service&quot;.  That is something that happens spontaneously (and unpredictably) - the ORCA reader simply disconnects itself from the master system for no known reason while the bus is in service. One minute it&#039;s working - the next there is a series of beeps and the reader shows &quot;out of service&quot;.

The only remedy that the driver has to put the reader back in service is to reboot the entire system - which involves pulling the bus over, going OUTSIDE the bus, opening the battery compartment and throwing the battery disconnect switch for 30 seconds.  There is no reset button for the on-board radio/ORCA inside the bus, or any reset that can be activated while the bus is in motion with the driver in their seat.

Metro has instructed drivers to accept ORCA cards as &quot;flash passes&quot; (just show them to the driver and your ride is guaranteed) during these times, and even though your e-purse will not be debited (it&#039;s a free ride for you at that point), those paying cash still have to pay.

I hope this helps fill the gap in your information that has led you to conclude that drivers are for some bizarre reason deliberatlely disabling ORCA for the sheer enteratainment value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gwen c.</p>
<p>There is no way that a driver can set the ORCA system to &#8220;Out of Service&#8221;.  That is something that happens spontaneously (and unpredictably) &#8211; the ORCA reader simply disconnects itself from the master system for no known reason while the bus is in service. One minute it&#8217;s working &#8211; the next there is a series of beeps and the reader shows &#8220;out of service&#8221;.</p>
<p>The only remedy that the driver has to put the reader back in service is to reboot the entire system &#8211; which involves pulling the bus over, going OUTSIDE the bus, opening the battery compartment and throwing the battery disconnect switch for 30 seconds.  There is no reset button for the on-board radio/ORCA inside the bus, or any reset that can be activated while the bus is in motion with the driver in their seat.</p>
<p>Metro has instructed drivers to accept ORCA cards as &#8220;flash passes&#8221; (just show them to the driver and your ride is guaranteed) during these times, and even though your e-purse will not be debited (it&#8217;s a free ride for you at that point), those paying cash still have to pay.</p>
<p>I hope this helps fill the gap in your information that has led you to conclude that drivers are for some bizarre reason deliberatlely disabling ORCA for the sheer enteratainment value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71818</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71818</guid>
		<description>If i dident get distracted would have said It will be a bumpy road at first, but in time its flaws will get worked out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i dident get distracted would have said It will be a bumpy road at first, but in time its flaws will get worked out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71817</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71817</guid>
		<description>the orca problems are many fold. I&#039;m sure early in 2010 some lawyer types will sue ST claming discrimination of some sort or another agenst the low income riders who cannot afford to buy and maintain an ORCA card since they will no longer be able to use transfers. Occasional Rider Joe will be turned off the system because he only goes to the &quot;M&#039;s&quot; or &quot;Seahawks&quot; Games on LINK and now that he cant transfer why bother and just drives in all the way (or only takes that mode so it dosent bother him at all). Bill the gangster wont like it because his fare evasion schemes wont work as well anymore, nor will Homeless Henry for the same reasons. But we really dont care about that as much.

The biggest problems i see, is lack of competent 24/7 telephone support, and the lack of TVMs at all major transit facilites/points to purchase/upgrade the media at. It will be a bumpy road but a road well traveled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the orca problems are many fold. I&#8217;m sure early in 2010 some lawyer types will sue ST claming discrimination of some sort or another agenst the low income riders who cannot afford to buy and maintain an ORCA card since they will no longer be able to use transfers. Occasional Rider Joe will be turned off the system because he only goes to the &#8220;M&#8217;s&#8221; or &#8220;Seahawks&#8221; Games on LINK and now that he cant transfer why bother and just drives in all the way (or only takes that mode so it dosent bother him at all). Bill the gangster wont like it because his fare evasion schemes wont work as well anymore, nor will Homeless Henry for the same reasons. But we really dont care about that as much.</p>
<p>The biggest problems i see, is lack of competent 24/7 telephone support, and the lack of TVMs at all major transit facilites/points to purchase/upgrade the media at. It will be a bumpy road but a road well traveled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71782</guid>
		<description>The 25c rule was insisted on by cash payers who didn&#039;t want to fumble around for dimes and nickles.  With ORCA it&#039;s a whole different thing because you&#039;re usually buying several trips at once, and either paying whole dollars or using a debit card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 25c rule was insisted on by cash payers who didn&#8217;t want to fumble around for dimes and nickles.  With ORCA it&#8217;s a whole different thing because you&#8217;re usually buying several trips at once, and either paying whole dollars or using a debit card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71781</guid>
		<description>Yes, MARTA offers a chip card and a visitor card side by side in the same TVM. I don&#039;t remember the visitor card but magnetic-stripe cardboard sounds about right. Chicago has only visitor cards at the airport; you have to go someplace else to get a Chicago Card. The visitor cards work like BART tickets or e-purses: you can gradually spend down the card, and refill it at any time. I don&#039;t know if you get the &lt;i&gt;same&lt;/i&gt; card back when you refill it, but who cares as long as the amount is right.  BART tickets can also have monthly passes on them.  So it seems like the only advantage of expensive RFID cards is contact-less tapping and web-based refilling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, MARTA offers a chip card and a visitor card side by side in the same TVM. I don&#8217;t remember the visitor card but magnetic-stripe cardboard sounds about right. Chicago has only visitor cards at the airport; you have to go someplace else to get a Chicago Card. The visitor cards work like BART tickets or e-purses: you can gradually spend down the card, and refill it at any time. I don&#8217;t know if you get the <i>same</i> card back when you refill it, but who cares as long as the amount is right.  BART tickets can also have monthly passes on them.  So it seems like the only advantage of expensive RFID cards is contact-less tapping and web-based refilling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil on qa</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71777</link>
		<dc:creator>phil on qa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71777</guid>
		<description>Bet it wouldn&#039;t be hard to find advertisers to sponsor privately designed/distributed maps (printed or online).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bet it wouldn&#8217;t be hard to find advertisers to sponsor privately designed/distributed maps (printed or online).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71776</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71776</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had drivers growl at me once or twice for the fare, but not since June. I feel that if I&#039;ve bought a pass, I&#039;m not going to pay twice. I used to carry a printout of the pass receipt to show the driver, but I&#039;ve never had to use it so I stopped.

And I&#039;ve noticed a significant improvement in bus ORCA readers the past few months. They&#039;re almost always set right and accept the card. But I can see that the 3/4 might be an exception. When I lived near Harborview I often took the 27 because it avoids the James Street slowness and annoying situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had drivers growl at me once or twice for the fare, but not since June. I feel that if I&#8217;ve bought a pass, I&#8217;m not going to pay twice. I used to carry a printout of the pass receipt to show the driver, but I&#8217;ve never had to use it so I stopped.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve noticed a significant improvement in bus ORCA readers the past few months. They&#8217;re almost always set right and accept the card. But I can see that the 3/4 might be an exception. When I lived near Harborview I often took the 27 because it avoids the James Street slowness and annoying situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwen c.</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71747</link>
		<dc:creator>gwen c.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71747</guid>
		<description>Other than the 2 (once) and the 3/4 (consistently), i&#039;ve never had a problem. If it worked as flawlessly as it does on the 522 (and the drivers were as nice about it), i&#039;d be all set. See also the 194, the 44, the 358, and plenty of other routes.

It&#039;s specifically the drivers that go up First Hill. I realize these routes are hell, but we still have 3/4 drivers that can&#039;t competently operate the wheelchair lift, folks. There&#039;s some serious malignancy there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than the 2 (once) and the 3/4 (consistently), i&#8217;ve never had a problem. If it worked as flawlessly as it does on the 522 (and the drivers were as nice about it), i&#8217;d be all set. See also the 194, the 44, the 358, and plenty of other routes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s specifically the drivers that go up First Hill. I realize these routes are hell, but we still have 3/4 drivers that can&#8217;t competently operate the wheelchair lift, folks. There&#8217;s some serious malignancy there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwen c.</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71746</link>
		<dc:creator>gwen c.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71746</guid>
		<description>Yeah, tried that. Was accurate about everything, and was told that &quot;because it&#039;s still in testing, we can&#039;t do anything.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, tried that. Was accurate about everything, and was told that &#8220;because it&#8217;s still in testing, we can&#8217;t do anything.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed R.</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71730</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71730</guid>
		<description>Hopefully they roll out an ORCA solution for vanpool riders before they start charging for ORCA cards...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully they roll out an ORCA solution for vanpool riders before they start charging for ORCA cards&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H. Duke</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/01/getting-to-light-rail/#comment-71720</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H. Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8198#comment-71720</guid>
		<description>That’s simply not true. Here’s the link:
http://transit.metrokc.gov/up/sc/plans/2008/102008-sesea-rb-sodo.html

It was every 30 minutes, and they were “considering” 15 minutes in the peak. Moreover, your original complaint was not having 15 minute headways in the peak. Seward Park has that, they just don’t go to the same station because of the reaction to the 34.

I didn’t say Metro killed the 50 for the 34, I said that’s why you don’t have more peak trips. Metro killed the 50 because of complaints from the VA and because it would have been a whole lot more service hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s simply not true. Here’s the link:<br />
<a href="http://transit.metrokc.gov/up/sc/plans/2008/102008-sesea-rb-sodo.html" rel="nofollow">http://transit.metrokc.gov/up/sc/plans/2008/102008-sesea-rb-sodo.html</a></p>
<p>It was every 30 minutes, and they were “considering” 15 minutes in the peak. Moreover, your original complaint was not having 15 minute headways in the peak. Seward Park has that, they just don’t go to the same station because of the reaction to the 34.</p>
<p>I didn’t say Metro killed the 50 for the 34, I said that’s why you don’t have more peak trips. Metro killed the 50 because of complaints from the VA and because it would have been a whole lot more service hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
