<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King County Metro Developer Workshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:59:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Metro Begins to Open Transit Feed Data - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/#comment-82885</link>
		<dc:creator>Metro Begins to Open Transit Feed Data - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8946#comment-82885</guid>
		<description>[...] some sweeping efforts to improve its relations with third-party developers, including hosting a workshop last month. Other agencies in the region could stand to learn from Metro&#8217;s efforts. Metro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some sweeping efforts to improve its relations with third-party developers, including hosting a workshop last month. Other agencies in the region could stand to learn from Metro&#8217;s efforts. Metro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/#comment-75882</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 04:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8946#comment-75882</guid>
		<description>GTFS format?  Great!  Why isn&#039;t it upload to http://code.google.com/p/googletransitdatafeed/ regularly?

Thanks!

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GTFS format?  Great!  Why isn&#8217;t it upload to <a href="http://code.google.com/p/googletransitdatafeed/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/googletransitdatafeed/</a> regularly?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/#comment-75827</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8946#comment-75827</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;The reason why county projects “suck” is because of the processes they are legally bound to. After figuring out what they want, they have to issue a RFP, wait for the bids to come in, wade through them, pick one, develop it, and then test it. It’s a long process. Even if they started today, it might be 3-4 years by the time it’s done, and would be technologically obsolete by then. The private sector doesn’t have this problem because they don’t have to be “fair”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps the proper thing to do is rather than using outside vendors and a rather cumbersome RFQ/RFP/bid process is to bring development of strategic applications in-house. Most companies do most of the core work for their web applications internally because it is the only way to deliver high-quality that meets the company needs quickly. Even in the private sector using an external vendor slows things way down and you are more likely to end up with something you can live with rather than what you really wanted.

Another thought would be to treat anything &quot;bleeding edge&quot; as research and fund people at the UW to work on it.

I&#039;d be interested in what other US transit agencies are doing along these lines, since most of them are operating under similar constraints to Metro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p>The reason why county projects “suck” is because of the processes they are legally bound to. After figuring out what they want, they have to issue a RFP, wait for the bids to come in, wade through them, pick one, develop it, and then test it. It’s a long process. Even if they started today, it might be 3-4 years by the time it’s done, and would be technologically obsolete by then. The private sector doesn’t have this problem because they don’t have to be “fair”.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps the proper thing to do is rather than using outside vendors and a rather cumbersome RFQ/RFP/bid process is to bring development of strategic applications in-house. Most companies do most of the core work for their web applications internally because it is the only way to deliver high-quality that meets the company needs quickly. Even in the private sector using an external vendor slows things way down and you are more likely to end up with something you can live with rather than what you really wanted.</p>
<p>Another thought would be to treat anything &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221; as research and fund people at the UW to work on it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in what other US transit agencies are doing along these lines, since most of them are operating under similar constraints to Metro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool Seattle Thing No. 3429: Dev Workshop for Transit Data &#171; The Q Function</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/#comment-75695</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool Seattle Thing No. 3429: Dev Workshop for Transit Data &#171; The Q Function</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8946#comment-75695</guid>
		<description>[...] bad I found out about this after the fact&#8230;  Apparently King County Metro recently hosted a Developer Workshop for transit data.  Apparently they&#8217;re looking for more people to write innovative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bad I found out about this after the fact&#8230;  Apparently King County Metro recently hosted a Developer Workshop for transit data.  Apparently they&#8217;re looking for more people to write innovative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/#comment-75614</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8946#comment-75614</guid>
		<description>Regarding accessing realtime AVL data, the consensus was:

- Right now Metro doesn&#039;t publish it themselves
- If you want it, grab it from &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/uwits&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UW ITS&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s an old project, but it still works beautifully.  It&#039;s also what powers One Bus Away
- It sounded like Metro wanted to publish AVL data once the &lt;a href=&quot;http://transit.metrokc.gov/am/vehicles/smartbus/smartbus.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OBS project&lt;/a&gt; is complete.  The project isn&#039;t done yet, and they&#039;re working with the vendor on how to publish the information.  The vendor has a solution that works with their product, but one of the goals of this meeting was to find out what developers wanted out of the project.
- Don&#039;t expect data from Metro until the OBS project is complete.  2010 at the earliest, 2011 is more likely.

A couple of other points:
The reason why county projects &quot;suck&quot; is because of the processes they are legally bound to.  After figuring out what they want, they have to issue a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request for proposal&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RFP&lt;/a&gt;, wait for the bids to come in, wade through them, pick one, develop it, and then test it.  It&#039;s a long process.  Even if they started today, it might be 3-4 years by the time it&#039;s done, and would be technologically obsolete by then.  The private sector doesn&#039;t have this problem because they don&#039;t have to be &quot;fair&quot;.

I didn&#039;t talk to Brian Ferris much as I have a pretty good idea of what he&#039;s up to so I&#039;m not sure how much he was pushing it, but anyone that wants to get started right now should look into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/onebusaway/wiki/OneBusAwayApiReference&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;One Bus Away API&lt;/a&gt;.  Augmenting this with the GTFS data can get you started NOW.  Brian has also done a lot of the difficult legwork--the REST API can even give you an encoded poly line for a given route for those wishing to work with mapping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding accessing realtime AVL data, the consensus was:</p>
<p>- Right now Metro doesn&#8217;t publish it themselves<br />
- If you want it, grab it from <a href="http://bit.ly/uwits" rel="nofollow">UW ITS</a>.  It&#8217;s an old project, but it still works beautifully.  It&#8217;s also what powers One Bus Away<br />
- It sounded like Metro wanted to publish AVL data once the <a href="http://transit.metrokc.gov/am/vehicles/smartbus/smartbus.html" rel="nofollow">OBS project</a> is complete.  The project isn&#8217;t done yet, and they&#8217;re working with the vendor on how to publish the information.  The vendor has a solution that works with their product, but one of the goals of this meeting was to find out what developers wanted out of the project.<br />
- Don&#8217;t expect data from Metro until the OBS project is complete.  2010 at the earliest, 2011 is more likely.</p>
<p>A couple of other points:<br />
The reason why county projects &#8220;suck&#8221; is because of the processes they are legally bound to.  After figuring out what they want, they have to issue a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request for proposal" rel="nofollow">RFP</a>, wait for the bids to come in, wade through them, pick one, develop it, and then test it.  It&#8217;s a long process.  Even if they started today, it might be 3-4 years by the time it&#8217;s done, and would be technologically obsolete by then.  The private sector doesn&#8217;t have this problem because they don&#8217;t have to be &#8220;fair&#8221;.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t talk to Brian Ferris much as I have a pretty good idea of what he&#8217;s up to so I&#8217;m not sure how much he was pushing it, but anyone that wants to get started right now should look into the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/onebusaway/wiki/OneBusAwayApiReference" rel="nofollow">One Bus Away API</a>.  Augmenting this with the GTFS data can get you started NOW.  Brian has also done a lot of the difficult legwork&#8211;the REST API can even give you an encoded poly line for a given route for those wishing to work with mapping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/#comment-75611</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8946#comment-75611</guid>
		<description>No slides, the only thing they gave us was the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kingcounty.gov/transportation/kcdot/MetroTransit/~/media/transportation/kcdot/MetroTransit/TAD_workshop/TAD_workshop_agenda.ashx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;agenda&lt;/a&gt; which was loosely followed.  Also, they were distributing the Fall 2009 shakeup in GTFS format.  You can still get a copy of the data, contact &lt;a href=&quot;http://directory.kingcounty.gov/EmployeeDetail.asp?EmpID=5251&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stephen Krippner&lt;/a&gt;.

I recorded the audio, I just need to edit it down a bit.  Will post the link &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/atomictaco&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No slides, the only thing they gave us was the <a href="http://www.kingcounty.gov/transportation/kcdot/MetroTransit/~/media/transportation/kcdot/MetroTransit/TAD_workshop/TAD_workshop_agenda.ashx" rel="nofollow">agenda</a> which was loosely followed.  Also, they were distributing the Fall 2009 shakeup in GTFS format.  You can still get a copy of the data, contact <a href="http://directory.kingcounty.gov/EmployeeDetail.asp?EmpID=5251" rel="nofollow">Stephen Krippner</a>.</p>
<p>I recorded the audio, I just need to edit it down a bit.  Will post the link <a href="http://twitter.com/atomictaco" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/10/23/king-county-metro-developer-workshop/#comment-75605</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=8946#comment-75605</guid>
		<description>Crap, I forgot about this due to work issues.  If there&#039;s another one, I&#039;d love to go.  Or if someone could share out any slides/apps/source/interface specs that were distributed at the meeting, that would be great too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap, I forgot about this due to work issues.  If there&#8217;s another one, I&#8217;d love to go.  Or if someone could share out any slides/apps/source/interface specs that were distributed at the meeting, that would be great too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
