<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sneak Peak at Seatac Station</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Airport Link Opening Tomorrow: T Minus 17 hours - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-90576</link>
		<dc:creator>Airport Link Opening Tomorrow: T Minus 17 hours - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-90576</guid>
		<description>[...] working on polishing up the station for Saturday&#8217;s big event.  You can read Martin&#8217;s detailed coverage last month of SeaTac Station and the opening day announcement, where Senator Murray was there to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] working on polishing up the station for Saturday&#8217;s big event.  You can read Martin&#8217;s detailed coverage last month of SeaTac Station and the opening day announcement, where Senator Murray was there to [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82171</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82171</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard for us to understand, but people in the 1940s-1960s saw the old architecture as backward; it reminded them of a past they wanted to get away from. So Art Deco in the 20s and 30s gave way to Brutalism and modernism (monorail, SCCC/NSCC/SSCC, kingdome, Kane/Schmitz/Sieg/McMahon/Hagget halls, 60s downtown library and Ballard library, etc). In the 90s came a new respect for classical styles, but materials and construction had become too expensive to mimic the ornate detail, so modernism was modified to accommodate the spirit of older styles (Benaroya, Washington Mutual/Chase tower, 90s UW library).

Car travel also played a role in simplifying the styles. When you walk right next to a building, you can see every detail. When you&#039;re viewing it from an arterial or highway, you can&#039;t see the details, so developers can get away with much cheaper/simpler styling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It&#8217;s hard for us to understand, but people in the 1940s-1960s saw the old architecture as backward; it reminded them of a past they wanted to get away from. So Art Deco in the 20s and 30s gave way to Brutalism and modernism (monorail, SCCC/NSCC/SSCC, kingdome, Kane/Schmitz/Sieg/McMahon/Hagget halls, 60s downtown library and Ballard library, etc). In the 90s came a new respect for classical styles, but materials and construction had become too expensive to mimic the ornate detail, so modernism was modified to accommodate the spirit of older styles (Benaroya, Washington Mutual/Chase tower, 90s UW library).</p>
<p>Car travel also played a role in simplifying the styles. When you walk right next to a building, you can see every detail. When you&#8217;re viewing it from an arterial or highway, you can&#8217;t see the details, so developers can get away with much cheaper/simpler styling.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82161</guid>
		<description>I was surprised at the open-wall stations in Vancouver and Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I was surprised at the open-wall stations in Vancouver and Chicago.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82143</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82143</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John.  Very interesting &amp; informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Thanks, John.  Very interesting &amp; informative.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82135</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82135</guid>
		<description>Bernie and Eric, the tracks have been done and in place for quite some time, and testing of the impedence bonds and signal system has been ongoing. Both are critical for rail safety. Our signal system ensures proper separation of trains.
Lines to power the trains have been energized for the same amount of time. I&#039;m not familiar with the certification process by the Feds, but everything has to be inspected and signed off... government agencies obviously move at their own pace, SLOW! : )
What we&#039;ve been waiting for is for the completion of the SeaTac Station itself. I haven&#039;t seen the actual cost figures, but I imagine completion will come on or under budget, and opening date as announced is almost two weeks earlier than the planned Dec 31st opening.
Initial training of light rail operators is a 6-8 week process. Once that training is complete, each operator had to qualify on the different track segments (Downtown Transit Tunnel, Beacon Hill Tunnel, Martin Luther King Jr Way where we are at grade level with traffic and pedestrians, and the elevated section between Rainier Beach and Tukwila), as each one is a unique operating environment. The airport extension is no different. The ratio of training staff to the 61 or so light rail operators we now have is what determines the time factor. Our previous qualifications occured during pre-revenue service, so training the 53 operators at that time took less time. Now we have to rotate operators from their duties during regular service, to go qualify on the airport segment, a process that will obviously take more time. We can&#039;t shut down the railroad to qualify people faster.
I&#039;m as anxious to get the airport extension opened as everyone else! I&#039;m also anxious to have the University Link segment in operation, but that&#039;s almost 7 years away.
I hope I&#039;ve helped everyone in understanding some of the behind-the-scenes processes going on, so perhaps the appreciation of the finished project will be greater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Bernie and Eric, the tracks have been done and in place for quite some time, and testing of the impedence bonds and signal system has been ongoing. Both are critical for rail safety. Our signal system ensures proper separation of trains.<br />
Lines to power the trains have been energized for the same amount of time. I&#8217;m not familiar with the certification process by the Feds, but everything has to be inspected and signed off&#8230; government agencies obviously move at their own pace, SLOW! : )<br />
What we&#8217;ve been waiting for is for the completion of the SeaTac Station itself. I haven&#8217;t seen the actual cost figures, but I imagine completion will come on or under budget, and opening date as announced is almost two weeks earlier than the planned Dec 31st opening.<br />
Initial training of light rail operators is a 6-8 week process. Once that training is complete, each operator had to qualify on the different track segments (Downtown Transit Tunnel, Beacon Hill Tunnel, Martin Luther King Jr Way where we are at grade level with traffic and pedestrians, and the elevated section between Rainier Beach and Tukwila), as each one is a unique operating environment. The airport extension is no different. The ratio of training staff to the 61 or so light rail operators we now have is what determines the time factor. Our previous qualifications occured during pre-revenue service, so training the 53 operators at that time took less time. Now we have to rotate operators from their duties during regular service, to go qualify on the airport segment, a process that will obviously take more time. We can&#8217;t shut down the railroad to qualify people faster.<br />
I&#8217;m as anxious to get the airport extension opened as everyone else! I&#8217;m also anxious to have the University Link segment in operation, but that&#8217;s almost 7 years away.<br />
I hope I&#8217;ve helped everyone in understanding some of the behind-the-scenes processes going on, so perhaps the appreciation of the finished project will be greater.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericn</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82124</link>
		<dc:creator>ericn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82124</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d assume that the tracks are ready for trains now, but the station/pedestrian bridges won&#039;t be ready until December.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;d assume that the tracks are ready for trains now, but the station/pedestrian bridges won&#8217;t be ready until December.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82116</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82116</guid>
		<description>Does it really take a month before trains can be operated safely on a new extention? It seems like revenue service could be provided Thanksgiving weekend. I admit I have no clue as to all that&#039;s involved so your insight would be appreciated. I&#039;m sure a lot of the general public is going to wonder why they have to catch a shuttle bus to the airport when the train they were just on is going there empty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Does it really take a month before trains can be operated safely on a new extention? It seems like revenue service could be provided Thanksgiving weekend. I admit I have no clue as to all that&#8217;s involved so your insight would be appreciated. I&#8217;m sure a lot of the general public is going to wonder why they have to catch a shuttle bus to the airport when the train they were just on is going there empty.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82111</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82111</guid>
		<description>As a King County Metro Bus driver (and now a KC/ST light rail operator), I never understood the rationale behind the decision by a bus patron to wait at a bus stop for up to 30 min to ride a bus to a bus stop 2-6 blocks away, when they could have easily walked that distance in far less time. Not only is it good exercise, but gives one the opportunity to discover things about your city that you may not previously have known.
I may be biased, but I think the SeaTac Light Rail Station turned out to be the best looking one of the bunch, even despite the scaled back architecture.
What I&#039;m looking forward to most is eliminating the confusion by light rail passengers as to which platform to they need to be on to catch THE NEXT train to Seattle (as is the case with Tukwila Int&#039;l Blvd Station with its platforms on either side, serving as a temporary terminal)... the platform at SeaTac is in the center.
We start qualifications training on the airport segment of the track today (Mon 11-16-09), and quite soon passengers will deboard at Tukwila (as they do now) while the train continues on to the SeaTac Station empty. This gives operators the opportunity to become completely familiar with the airport link segment of the track, so things run smoothly come opening day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
As a King County Metro Bus driver (and now a KC/ST light rail operator), I never understood the rationale behind the decision by a bus patron to wait at a bus stop for up to 30 min to ride a bus to a bus stop 2-6 blocks away, when they could have easily walked that distance in far less time. Not only is it good exercise, but gives one the opportunity to discover things about your city that you may not previously have known.<br />
I may be biased, but I think the SeaTac Light Rail Station turned out to be the best looking one of the bunch, even despite the scaled back architecture.<br />
What I&#8217;m looking forward to most is eliminating the confusion by light rail passengers as to which platform to they need to be on to catch THE NEXT train to Seattle (as is the case with Tukwila Int&#8217;l Blvd Station with its platforms on either side, serving as a temporary terminal)&#8230; the platform at SeaTac is in the center.<br />
We start qualifications training on the airport segment of the track today (Mon 11-16-09), and quite soon passengers will deboard at Tukwila (as they do now) while the train continues on to the SeaTac Station empty. This gives operators the opportunity to become completely familiar with the airport link segment of the track, so things run smoothly come opening day.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squints</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-82066</link>
		<dc:creator>Squints</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-82066</guid>
		<description>McGinn didn&#039;t change his opinion - he simply admitted that it was no longer his role to try and block it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
McGinn didn&#8217;t change his opinion &#8211; he simply admitted that it was no longer his role to try and block it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81839</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81839</guid>
		<description>That building happens to be a Qwest telephone exchange. Now there is a chance Qwest might be willing to put something a little more pedestrian friendly at street level but I wouldn&#039;t bet on it. Phone companies like to keep their core infrastructure secure and they don&#039;t like other non-telecom tenants in their buildings.

There is some hope though, modern exchanges take up far less space than the old crossbar switches or first-generation electronic switching systems. However there still is the problem of needing to terminate the wire plant somewhere. Moving that is a bit of a challenge. It can be done though. The old Qwest building which is now the Bellevue City Hall also housed a phone exchange. As far as I know this was moved elsewhere when Qwest vacated the building. So it is conceivable Qwest might at some point consolidate it&#039;s downtown Seattle facilities further. Unfortunately I suspect the building would likely become a co-lo facility rather than being converted to conventional office space or torn down. At least this is what has happened to many other former large downtown telephone exchange buildings across the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
That building happens to be a Qwest telephone exchange. Now there is a chance Qwest might be willing to put something a little more pedestrian friendly at street level but I wouldn&#8217;t bet on it. Phone companies like to keep their core infrastructure secure and they don&#8217;t like other non-telecom tenants in their buildings.</p>
<p>There is some hope though, modern exchanges take up far less space than the old crossbar switches or first-generation electronic switching systems. However there still is the problem of needing to terminate the wire plant somewhere. Moving that is a bit of a challenge. It can be done though. The old Qwest building which is now the Bellevue City Hall also housed a phone exchange. As far as I know this was moved elsewhere when Qwest vacated the building. So it is conceivable Qwest might at some point consolidate it&#8217;s downtown Seattle facilities further. Unfortunately I suspect the building would likely become a co-lo facility rather than being converted to conventional office space or torn down. At least this is what has happened to many other former large downtown telephone exchange buildings across the US.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81823</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81823</guid>
		<description>If the APM is built there is a chance it might stop at the Link station as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If the APM is built there is a chance it might stop at the Link station as well.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81713</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81713</guid>
		<description>Here is a slide show of the new Gold Line stations opening in LA this weekend:

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/arts/la-et-architecture13-2009nov13-pictures,0,1506331.photogallery?index=?index=la-et-goldline00_kt0bmpnc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Here is a slide show of the new Gold Line stations opening in LA this weekend:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/arts/la-et-architecture13-2009nov13-pictures,0,1506331.photogallery?index=?index=la-et-goldline00_kt0bmpnc" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/arts/la-et-architecture13-2009nov13-pictures,0,1506331.photogallery?index=?index=la-et-goldline00_kt0bmpnc</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Whittome</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81695</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Whittome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81695</guid>
		<description>Yes, that too - it is just an invite to taggers etc.  It is all part of the same hideous block as the Post Office - I hadn&#039;t heard that was to be closed though - they have just done a sort of upgrade to it but not as extensively as one would have liked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yes, that too &#8211; it is just an invite to taggers etc.  It is all part of the same hideous block as the Post Office &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t heard that was to be closed though &#8211; they have just done a sort of upgrade to it but not as extensively as one would have liked.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81692</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81692</guid>
		<description>Ooh near the Rental Car Center there&#039;s a thing that says &quot;Possible Rental Car APM.&quot; Does that stand for Automated People Mover? If so, sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Ooh near the Rental Car Center there&#8217;s a thing that says &#8220;Possible Rental Car APM.&#8221; Does that stand for Automated People Mover? If so, sweet.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81691</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81691</guid>
		<description>I for one like brutalist architecture. DC Metro – yeah!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I for one like brutalist architecture. DC Metro – yeah!!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81689</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81689</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s TSA, not FAA, but I might be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I think that&#8217;s TSA, not FAA, but I might be wrong.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81687</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81687</guid>
		<description>I hear the Downtown Post Office is on the proposed closure list, so we might get that knocked down. And I would add that creepy, imposing, almost windowless building at 3rd &amp; Seneca to that list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I hear the Downtown Post Office is on the proposed closure list, so we might get that knocked down. And I would add that creepy, imposing, almost windowless building at 3rd &amp; Seneca to that list.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81684</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81684</guid>
		<description>Also, if you&#039;ve seen, the Rainier Valley stations have green walls along the platforms with ivy starting to grow in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Also, if you&#8217;ve seen, the Rainier Valley stations have green walls along the platforms with ivy starting to grow in<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81679</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81679</guid>
		<description>Just took Link home from SeaTac today.  It was a nice trip!  I can&#039;t wait for the airport station to be complete so that I don&#039;t have to wait for the shuttle bus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Just took Link home from SeaTac today.  It was a nice trip!  I can&#8217;t wait for the airport station to be complete so that I don&#8217;t have to wait for the shuttle bus.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/11/13/a-sneak-peak-at-seatac-station/#comment-81678</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=9756#comment-81678</guid>
		<description>The triangle transit center concept is a major part of the SR 520 HCT Plan because the Montlake flyer stop won&#039;t be rebuilt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The triangle transit center concept is a major part of the SR 520 HCT Plan because the Montlake flyer stop won&#8217;t be rebuilt.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 424/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-25 18:01:44 -->
