<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editorial: 12th Ave Couplet is Still a Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:50:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-103176</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-103176</guid>
		<description>hospitals aren&#039;t the focus of the streetcar... but IF they were, look at them as a business (that&#039;s essentially all they are):  they have both one time and regular customers, they have an enormous FT staff, and they run 24hours, so that staff arrives thrice, in three different shifts everyday of the week, 365 a year.  While some employees might be living on FH, the mjority are not.   Their parking/transit/commutes needs are unusually high, and the pedestrian traffic they create is especially vunerable to non-ped-friendly environments (slow/sick/disabled peds).  Additionally, their long-stay customers (patients) generate visitors, and add yet more demand.   They are much like schools/universities when compared this way, except SCHOOLS DONT RUN THREE SHIFTS AND 7 DAYS A WEEK.   There are 3+ major medical institutions and DOZENS of &quot;minor&quot; med centers on Pill Hill:  PugetSound Blood center, polyclinic, private doc offices (like at Seneca Tower), and a bunch of hotels to support the pill hill businesses.   Add to the mix 7000+ FH residents and HR/300&#039; zoning EAST of I-5 and WEST of Bway/Boylston.  Add two major private schools and a regional museum.  Add the regular joe businesses like banks and cafe&#039;s, george&#039;s deli and Mstreet market...

Minor or Boren alignment please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
hospitals aren&#8217;t the focus of the streetcar&#8230; but IF they were, look at them as a business (that&#8217;s essentially all they are):  they have both one time and regular customers, they have an enormous FT staff, and they run 24hours, so that staff arrives thrice, in three different shifts everyday of the week, 365 a year.  While some employees might be living on FH, the mjority are not.   Their parking/transit/commutes needs are unusually high, and the pedestrian traffic they create is especially vunerable to non-ped-friendly environments (slow/sick/disabled peds).  Additionally, their long-stay customers (patients) generate visitors, and add yet more demand.   They are much like schools/universities when compared this way, except SCHOOLS DONT RUN THREE SHIFTS AND 7 DAYS A WEEK.   There are 3+ major medical institutions and DOZENS of &#8220;minor&#8221; med centers on Pill Hill:  PugetSound Blood center, polyclinic, private doc offices (like at Seneca Tower), and a bunch of hotels to support the pill hill businesses.   Add to the mix 7000+ FH residents and HR/300&#8242; zoning EAST of I-5 and WEST of Bway/Boylston.  Add two major private schools and a regional museum.  Add the regular joe businesses like banks and cafe&#8217;s, george&#8217;s deli and Mstreet market&#8230;</p>
<p>Minor or Boren alignment please.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-103170</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-103170</guid>
		<description>Adam has hit the proverbial thing on the head.
The 12th &quot;option&quot; helps no true friend of long range transit planning(but may help garages on FH defend their monopoly on profit from bad commute choices) and clouds the real transit priorities at stake from the beginning of ST, or dare I say even, from way back when &#039;Forward Thrust&#039; was pencilled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Adam has hit the proverbial thing on the head.<br />
The 12th &#8220;option&#8221; helps no true friend of long range transit planning(but may help garages on FH defend their monopoly on profit from bad commute choices) and clouds the real transit priorities at stake from the beginning of ST, or dare I say even, from way back when &#8216;Forward Thrust&#8217; was pencilled.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-103169</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-103169</guid>
		<description>sorry ron, 
the &quot;purpose of the streetcar&quot; has been written into legal docs by both Sound Transit and the City of Seattle:  the 1st priority is linking First Hill to the Light Rail.  Employers and institutions are mentioned in the Agreement, but you&#039;ll notice that they&#039;re listed dead last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
sorry ron,<br />
the &#8220;purpose of the streetcar&#8221; has been written into legal docs by both Sound Transit and the City of Seattle:  the 1st priority is linking First Hill to the Light Rail.  Employers and institutions are mentioned in the Agreement, but you&#8217;ll notice that they&#8217;re listed dead last.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-103166</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-103166</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;quaint brand-new 12th &lt;/b&gt; = awesome oxymoron

Gotta ask about the NIMBY-colored elephant in the room:  how the fawk are you going to get the folks on 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th to allow the zoning changes required to justify a streetcar-line-sized jump in retail density   ...next to all those old be-front-lawned craftsman homes???

Ain&#039;t going to happen soon, and will require a 15-25 year plan of buying houses, converting to townhomes, and changing the entire character of squire park / cherry hill / the east half of the 12th avenue neighborhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<b>quaint brand-new 12th </b> = awesome oxymoron</p>
<p>Gotta ask about the NIMBY-colored elephant in the room:  how the fawk are you going to get the folks on 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th to allow the zoning changes required to justify a streetcar-line-sized jump in retail density   &#8230;next to all those old be-front-lawned craftsman homes???</p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t going to happen soon, and will require a 15-25 year plan of buying houses, converting to townhomes, and changing the entire character of squire park / cherry hill / the east half of the 12th avenue neighborhood.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-103162</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-103162</guid>
		<description>Yes, SU needs access ASAP.  Do ridership projections and if the numbers are in line with most bus routes, add a bus route.  Brain not required on that one, right?   

Streetcars are a bit more permanent so align it accordingly.  &quot;100 year plan&quot; style.   How were SF streetcars planned?  How were Seattle&#039;s?  How were NYC MTA alignments planned?   
4 easy basics that come to mind:  Aim at density, connect major institutions that served the greatest number of the public, reduce traffic by trying to replace common &amp; frequent commutes, connect with other transit modes and routes.


define &quot;SU folks&quot;, please?  Transient (2 to 4 year) student population?  The ones who are mainly housed on-campus in the numerous dorms and nearby SU-owed residential units??   
   Or the professors/staff of SU?  SU&#039;s population (aka customers and workers) doesn&#039;t really rank quite as highly as &#039;community members&#039;/stakeholders as FH residents and business owners.
 
The purpose of the streetcar is highly debated, but the law lays it clear: it&#039;s to connect first hill to the ST light rail.   The use/ridership/need of these &#039;SU folks&#039; to get to, say, UW stadium or Columbia city is suspect  compared the need of the 7000+ residents of first hill and x number of patients, customers and staff to get on and off the real First Hill area (moreorless: I-5 to broadway, union to yesler) daily.   
 Thousands of washington voters backed ST so we could take cars off the street, encourage transit as a culture rather than SOVs, and hold back damage needless to the environment.  Economic development on 12th (aka money in the construction industries&#039; pockets + yet another Quiznos) and college convenience or support(SU isn&#039;t suffering from low enrollment by any means) aren&#039;t part of the regional-transport-focused ST equation, so they therefore must not be part of the streetcar equation.

Rather than &#039;walk sheds&#039; &amp; &#039;3 blocks is too far VS no it isnt&#039; debates and &#039;potential development&#039; or &#039;socio-economic justice&#039; BS, will someone please work up a map that shows where SOV vehicle density/congestion is currently worst (AND maybe also where current ped use is least), and then tune an alignment to those facts?

(Oh wait, the federal census already did partially do that:  and found FH has longer transit and car commute times than the 12th Avenue neighborhood... Despite the disparity in bus routes.  Huh.   Could it be the fact First Hill is one of the densest zoned neighborhoods?  THE most densely-zoned residential neighborhood in the city?  Perhaps a factor is the proliferation of parking lots and garages ENCOURAGING car use for trips to St James, or Virginia Mason, or Harborview?)
  Can&#039;t help but think the folks charging 20+ bucks a day at the hospital garages are perhaps funding the pro-12th alignment campaign...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yes, SU needs access ASAP.  Do ridership projections and if the numbers are in line with most bus routes, add a bus route.  Brain not required on that one, right?   </p>
<p>Streetcars are a bit more permanent so align it accordingly.  &#8220;100 year plan&#8221; style.   How were SF streetcars planned?  How were Seattle&#8217;s?  How were NYC MTA alignments planned?<br />
4 easy basics that come to mind:  Aim at density, connect major institutions that served the greatest number of the public, reduce traffic by trying to replace common &amp; frequent commutes, connect with other transit modes and routes.</p>
<p>define &#8220;SU folks&#8221;, please?  Transient (2 to 4 year) student population?  The ones who are mainly housed on-campus in the numerous dorms and nearby SU-owed residential units??<br />
   Or the professors/staff of SU?  SU&#8217;s population (aka customers and workers) doesn&#8217;t really rank quite as highly as &#8216;community members&#8217;/stakeholders as FH residents and business owners.</p>
<p>The purpose of the streetcar is highly debated, but the law lays it clear: it&#8217;s to connect first hill to the ST light rail.   The use/ridership/need of these &#8216;SU folks&#8217; to get to, say, UW stadium or Columbia city is suspect  compared the need of the 7000+ residents of first hill and x number of patients, customers and staff to get on and off the real First Hill area (moreorless: I-5 to broadway, union to yesler) daily.<br />
 Thousands of washington voters backed ST so we could take cars off the street, encourage transit as a culture rather than SOVs, and hold back damage needless to the environment.  Economic development on 12th (aka money in the construction industries&#8217; pockets + yet another Quiznos) and college convenience or support(SU isn&#8217;t suffering from low enrollment by any means) aren&#8217;t part of the regional-transport-focused ST equation, so they therefore must not be part of the streetcar equation.</p>
<p>Rather than &#8216;walk sheds&#8217; &amp; &#8217;3 blocks is too far VS no it isnt&#8217; debates and &#8216;potential development&#8217; or &#8216;socio-economic justice&#8217; BS, will someone please work up a map that shows where SOV vehicle density/congestion is currently worst (AND maybe also where current ped use is least), and then tune an alignment to those facts?</p>
<p>(Oh wait, the federal census already did partially do that:  and found FH has longer transit and car commute times than the 12th Avenue neighborhood&#8230; Despite the disparity in bus routes.  Huh.   Could it be the fact First Hill is one of the densest zoned neighborhoods?  THE most densely-zoned residential neighborhood in the city?  Perhaps a factor is the proliferation of parking lots and garages ENCOURAGING car use for trips to St James, or Virginia Mason, or Harborview?)<br />
  Can&#8217;t help but think the folks charging 20+ bucks a day at the hospital garages are perhaps funding the pro-12th alignment campaign&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fact-Checking the 12th Ave Couplet - Seattle Transit Blog</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-97321</link>
		<dc:creator>Fact-Checking the 12th Ave Couplet - Seattle Transit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-97321</guid>
		<description>[...] (For background on these alignments, see an earlier blog entry.) After we editorialized about our continuing dislike of the 12th Ave Couplet, the Slog ran an Op-Ed supporting the alignment, written by two proponents, Kate Stineback and Bill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
[...] (For background on these alignments, see an earlier blog entry.) After we editorialized about our continuing dislike of the 12th Ave Couplet, the Slog ran an Op-Ed supporting the alignment, written by two proponents, Kate Stineback and Bill [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96995</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96995</guid>
		<description>the waterfront line carried 300K+ trips a year. What&#039;s the definition of &quot;didn&#039;t get a lot of riders&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
the waterfront line carried 300K+ trips a year. What&#8217;s the definition of &#8220;didn&#8217;t get a lot of riders&#8221;?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96994</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96994</guid>
		<description>Yes, and the SU campus is ripe for wayfinding improvements and many other things. SU would welcome more people crossing the campus, which frankly in many ways is a far nicer pedestrian environment than the streets which flank it.

And there&#039;s more to the neighborhoods than the hospitals...several of which would have had far longer walks from the light rail station that was to be built in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yes, and the SU campus is ripe for wayfinding improvements and many other things. SU would welcome more people crossing the campus, which frankly in many ways is a far nicer pedestrian environment than the streets which flank it.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s more to the neighborhoods than the hospitals&#8230;several of which would have had far longer walks from the light rail station that was to be built in the first place.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96555</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96555</guid>
		<description>You walk a quarter mile to go one stop on a streetcar route? That is what Adam is talking about. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
You walk a quarter mile to go one stop on a streetcar route? That is what Adam is talking about. :-)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96553</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96553</guid>
		<description>&quot;The difference between walking 15 minutes and walking 29 minutes is hardly noticable.&quot;

Walking twice as far is hardly noticeable? Maybe in bizzaroworld. 

I don&#039;t mind walking, but certainly wouldn&#039;t want to include a 30 minute walk as part of my daily commute. A 15 minute walk is about the max that most people are willing to do as part of a transit trip, and 5 or 10 minutes is more realistic for a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
&#8220;The difference between walking 15 minutes and walking 29 minutes is hardly noticable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Walking twice as far is hardly noticeable? Maybe in bizzaroworld. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind walking, but certainly wouldn&#8217;t want to include a 30 minute walk as part of my daily commute. A 15 minute walk is about the max that most people are willing to do as part of a transit trip, and 5 or 10 minutes is more realistic for a lot of people.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stefan</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96537</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96537</guid>
		<description>It is if you are dealing with small children, carrying something heavy, or the weather is simply nasty out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It is if you are dealing with small children, carrying something heavy, or the weather is simply nasty out.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96522</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96522</guid>
		<description>I already do this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I already do this&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96521</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96521</guid>
		<description>The difference between walking 15 minutes and walking 29 minutes is hardly noticable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The difference between walking 15 minutes and walking 29 minutes is hardly noticable.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96519</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96519</guid>
		<description>You can carry your one-year old. I have a one-year as well. Give me a break.

And it&#039;s 4 blocks. So, you should be fine. I walk it everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
You can carry your one-year old. I have a one-year as well. Give me a break.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s 4 blocks. So, you should be fine. I walk it everyday.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96518</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96518</guid>
		<description>It was outpatient as well as tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It was outpatient as well as tests.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96406</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96406</guid>
		<description>Yes! Broadway from end to end! Just make sure you lobby your new mayor and city council for funds to complete it. And make sure you let SDOT know your routing preference. It&#039;s all well and good to make your preference known here, but you also need to tell the people who will ultimately make the routing choice. You can bet the 12th Ave contingent will be out in force at the open houses and planning meetings, so make sure you are too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yes! Broadway from end to end! Just make sure you lobby your new mayor and city council for funds to complete it. And make sure you let SDOT know your routing preference. It&#8217;s all well and good to make your preference known here, but you also need to tell the people who will ultimately make the routing choice. You can bet the 12th Ave contingent will be out in force at the open houses and planning meetings, so make sure you are too.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad R</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96402</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96402</guid>
		<description>ATE,

Your last paragraph says what I&#039;ve been trying to say, but in a much better way.  I would love to be able to go all the way to the Harvard Exit theatre on the streetcar, go across the street to Dilletante for dessert, and then downtown, all on the streetcar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
ATE,</p>
<p>Your last paragraph says what I&#8217;ve been trying to say, but in a much better way.  I would love to be able to go all the way to the Harvard Exit theatre on the streetcar, go across the street to Dilletante for dessert, and then downtown, all on the streetcar.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATE</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96314</link>
		<dc:creator>ATE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96314</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind walking few blocks for most things, but I just think it is retarded that the city would spend good money to build a mass transit system &amp; have it stop just as it begins to reach the most densely populated section of the most densely populated neighborhood of the largest city in the entire region...  If they extended the rail line another six blocks, how many homes &amp; businesses would they add to those &quot;walking shed&quot; maps?  Where else could they possibly get more bang for their buck in terms of placing mass transit within a few blocks of more homes &amp; businesses?

If they&#039;re interested in spurring development, why not consider that there are literally hundreds of new, empty residential units &amp; lots of empty commercial space over there?  Last time I checked, having lots of empty units in the neighborhood does not inspire investors to start breaking ground on developments a few blocks away.

Also, perception is very important:  Seeing a train running up &amp; down the entire length of Broadway adds to the visibility of the streetcar, and reminds folks, &quot;Hey! I can be anywhere along Broadway and take the streetcar to &amp; from Pioneer Square!&quot;.  This is part of the reason that a 12th Ave loop would be a disaster: it would not create enough of a visible, logical, easily conceptualized transit system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I don&#8217;t mind walking few blocks for most things, but I just think it is retarded that the city would spend good money to build a mass transit system &amp; have it stop just as it begins to reach the most densely populated section of the most densely populated neighborhood of the largest city in the entire region&#8230;  If they extended the rail line another six blocks, how many homes &amp; businesses would they add to those &#8220;walking shed&#8221; maps?  Where else could they possibly get more bang for their buck in terms of placing mass transit within a few blocks of more homes &amp; businesses?</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re interested in spurring development, why not consider that there are literally hundreds of new, empty residential units &amp; lots of empty commercial space over there?  Last time I checked, having lots of empty units in the neighborhood does not inspire investors to start breaking ground on developments a few blocks away.</p>
<p>Also, perception is very important:  Seeing a train running up &amp; down the entire length of Broadway adds to the visibility of the streetcar, and reminds folks, &#8220;Hey! I can be anywhere along Broadway and take the streetcar to &amp; from Pioneer Square!&#8221;.  This is part of the reason that a 12th Ave loop would be a disaster: it would not create enough of a visible, logical, easily conceptualized transit system.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96196</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96196</guid>
		<description>Yes. It has been studied. There is not money allocated to go north to Aloha, but that would be the obvious place to extend to. It is possible, and even logical, to extend the streetcar once it is built, but you&#039;re going to have to come up with some money to do so. That money does not yet exist.

Also, I do live in that area (10th and Harrison) and while I&#039;d love to see a streetcar along Broadway, is Roy from Denny really a &quot;hike&quot;? It&#039;s pretty much a level walk and I can&#039;t imagine many folks waiting for the streetcar to go one stop. Now, Roy to Pike-Pine, I can see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yes. It has been studied. There is not money allocated to go north to Aloha, but that would be the obvious place to extend to. It is possible, and even logical, to extend the streetcar once it is built, but you&#8217;re going to have to come up with some money to do so. That money does not yet exist.</p>
<p>Also, I do live in that area (10th and Harrison) and while I&#8217;d love to see a streetcar along Broadway, is Roy from Denny really a &#8220;hike&#8221;? It&#8217;s pretty much a level walk and I can&#8217;t imagine many folks waiting for the streetcar to go one stop. Now, Roy to Pike-Pine, I can see.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jensen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/01/08/12th-ave-couplet-still-a-bad-idea/#comment-96194</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=11259#comment-96194</guid>
		<description>The next goal should be to extend the streetcar line, north to Aloha, so relying on the loop is not smart. Also, note you chose the advantageous direction. If someone were wanting to head north but is far closer to a southbound stop going to go all the way to the International District to get to the Capitol Hill light rail stop? Probably not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The next goal should be to extend the streetcar line, north to Aloha, so relying on the loop is not smart. Also, note you chose the advantageous direction. If someone were wanting to head north but is far closer to a southbound stop going to go all the way to the International District to get to the Capitol Hill light rail stop? Probably not.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 423/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-02-13 00:56:27 -->
