<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sound Transit: Looking at Changing Fare Structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Allen</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-111527</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-111527</guid>
		<description>Thank you Mike, easily the best question to pose about the RFA. Name a major city that needs this in order to handle rush hour? I was just in Phillie, they run way more busses, easily double the frequency at rush hour and still each one is packed, no RFA, no confusion, you pay or you walk.

Metro seems happy to ignore how much the PAYL slows down heavily loaded busses at each outbound stop. Time saved on 3rd is promptly lost at every outbound stop while people force their way back up the aisle dropping their change on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Thank you Mike, easily the best question to pose about the RFA. Name a major city that needs this in order to handle rush hour? I was just in Phillie, they run way more busses, easily double the frequency at rush hour and still each one is packed, no RFA, no confusion, you pay or you walk.</p>
<p>Metro seems happy to ignore how much the PAYL slows down heavily loaded busses at each outbound stop. Time saved on 3rd is promptly lost at every outbound stop while people force their way back up the aisle dropping their change on the way.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Charles Wilson</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-111013</link>
		<dc:creator>John Charles Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-111013</guid>
		<description>A new thought on the RFA and Pay As You Leave. There is a way to preserve (limited) free service downtown and have all buses Pay As You Enter. That would be to restrict the free rides to buses which *terminate* in the RFA. The farebox would simply be covered when the bus enters the RFA boundary. Buses beginning in or passing through downtown would not participate in the RFA. Something similar goes into effect on the Nicollet Mall in Minneapolis tomorrow. Route 18 Northbound and Routes 10 and 59 Southbound will be free if you board on the Nicollet Mall. These routes all terminate downtown. The regular &quot;Downtown Zone&quot; fare of 50 cents will apply in the opposite direction, but I&#039;m guessing this is an experiment towards making all Downtown fares only apply on terminating routes with or without elimination of the 50 cent fare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
A new thought on the RFA and Pay As You Leave. There is a way to preserve (limited) free service downtown and have all buses Pay As You Enter. That would be to restrict the free rides to buses which *terminate* in the RFA. The farebox would simply be covered when the bus enters the RFA boundary. Buses beginning in or passing through downtown would not participate in the RFA. Something similar goes into effect on the Nicollet Mall in Minneapolis tomorrow. Route 18 Northbound and Routes 10 and 59 Southbound will be free if you board on the Nicollet Mall. These routes all terminate downtown. The regular &#8220;Downtown Zone&#8221; fare of 50 cents will apply in the opposite direction, but I&#8217;m guessing this is an experiment towards making all Downtown fares only apply on terminating routes with or without elimination of the 50 cent fare.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-111009</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-111009</guid>
		<description>&quot;How would the ticket vending machine know you came from the airport, or from the neighborhood around the station?&quot;

Tentatively, I&#039;d say that the stations with airport surcharges are isolated. There is no surrounding neighborhood, the only buses dead-end at the airport, and there are fare gates to enforce payment. I don&#039;t know these areas well since I just get on the train and leave. I think SFO station just has airport parking around it? And Newark is similar? (Note the $2 bus to Newark Penn Station for cheapskates.) Only a few NJT stations have fare gates, and Newark Airport happens to be one of them. At JFK, the surcharge is on the Airtrain which goes only from the subway to the airport with no other stops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
&#8220;How would the ticket vending machine know you came from the airport, or from the neighborhood around the station?&#8221;</p>
<p>Tentatively, I&#8217;d say that the stations with airport surcharges are isolated. There is no surrounding neighborhood, the only buses dead-end at the airport, and there are fare gates to enforce payment. I don&#8217;t know these areas well since I just get on the train and leave. I think SFO station just has airport parking around it? And Newark is similar? (Note the $2 bus to Newark Penn Station for cheapskates.) Only a few NJT stations have fare gates, and Newark Airport happens to be one of them. At JFK, the surcharge is on the Airtrain which goes only from the subway to the airport with no other stops.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110902</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110902</guid>
		<description>The same way those other system do it: they just charge everyone the airport fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The same way those other system do it: they just charge everyone the airport fee.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleci</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110897</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110897</guid>
		<description>Matt,
How would the ticket vending machine know you came from the airport, or from the neighborhood around the station?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Matt,<br />
How would the ticket vending machine know you came from the airport, or from the neighborhood around the station?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleci</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110895</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110895</guid>
		<description>I should have been more specific.  The youth fare on Metro is 75-cents today.  Do we really know what it will be next year or the year after?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I should have been more specific.  The youth fare on Metro is 75-cents today.  Do we really know what it will be next year or the year after?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Engineer</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110877</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110877</guid>
		<description>I think we just found a faster way to pay for ST2: $10 airport fee! (those that miss the 194 will love that one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I think we just found a faster way to pay for ST2: $10 airport fee! (those that miss the 194 will love that one)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110825</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110825</guid>
		<description>&quot;Guess they’re trying to recover the billion-and-a-half they spent bringing BART to SFO.&quot;

Possibly, or they&#039;re just trying to gouge plane travellers. Everything south of Colma was part of the same extension but only SFO pays the surcharge. I wonder if airport workers get a price break? 

There are similar gougings at other airports. Trains from Manhattan to Newark are $4, but to Newark Airport are $15. JFK Air Train is $5 for a mile or so, while the subway is $2.25 for what, 30 miles to downtown?  Plus they get more from the &quot;visitor confusion tax&quot;.  The Air Train cards at the TVMs sound like they&#039;re Metrocards good on both the subway and Air Train, but when I got a multi-ride card I found it was good only on the Air Train and the agent wouldn&#039;t give me a refund. I ended up using the card on two extra trips (because the airline lost my luggage), and gave the rest of the card to somebody else, but I was still mad about it.

Denver has a $13 hour bus ride to the airport. However, the trip is 13 miles on a freeway through emptiness -- there&#039;s nothing around the airport -- so part of the cost may be justified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
&#8220;Guess they’re trying to recover the billion-and-a-half they spent bringing BART to SFO.&#8221;</p>
<p>Possibly, or they&#8217;re just trying to gouge plane travellers. Everything south of Colma was part of the same extension but only SFO pays the surcharge. I wonder if airport workers get a price break? </p>
<p>There are similar gougings at other airports. Trains from Manhattan to Newark are $4, but to Newark Airport are $15. JFK Air Train is $5 for a mile or so, while the subway is $2.25 for what, 30 miles to downtown?  Plus they get more from the &#8220;visitor confusion tax&#8221;.  The Air Train cards at the TVMs sound like they&#8217;re Metrocards good on both the subway and Air Train, but when I got a multi-ride card I found it was good only on the Air Train and the agent wouldn&#8217;t give me a refund. I ended up using the card on two extra trips (because the airline lost my luggage), and gave the rest of the card to somebody else, but I was still mad about it.</p>
<p>Denver has a $13 hour bus ride to the airport. However, the trip is 13 miles on a freeway through emptiness &#8212; there&#8217;s nothing around the airport &#8212; so part of the cost may be justified.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110822</guid>
		<description>San Francisco and LA have a lot of buses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
San Francisco and LA have a lot of buses.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110741</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110741</guid>
		<description>Actually, I just looked, as I have to take the Canada Line from the airport next month, and it was $5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Actually, I just looked, as I have to take the Canada Line from the airport next month, and it was $5.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110733</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110733</guid>
		<description>Next year Metro one-zone off peak goes to $2.25 and $2.50. Since ST is supposed to be longer distance service, ST doesn&#039;t want to undercut MT fares and fvvor taking on the short riders. Consistent fares between MT &amp; ST would solve that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Next year Metro one-zone off peak goes to $2.25 and $2.50. Since ST is supposed to be longer distance service, ST doesn&#8217;t want to undercut MT fares and fvvor taking on the short riders. Consistent fares between MT &amp; ST would solve that problem.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam B. Parast</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110706</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam B. Parast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110706</guid>
		<description>What did they do that is special? Anytime I&#039;m in the tunnel after 7 the buses are painfully slow, so slow it screws with link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
What did they do that is special? Anytime I&#8217;m in the tunnel after 7 the buses are painfully slow, so slow it screws with link.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam B. Parast</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110704</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam B. Parast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110704</guid>
		<description>Yeah I was going to say that the 522 is the only route that will be significantly affected. Maybe it would be better to change it into a rapidride line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yeah I was going to say that the 522 is the only route that will be significantly affected. Maybe it would be better to change it into a rapidride line.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110674</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110674</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think this is an issue and fails to address the problem that the long haul busses have much lower boardings per mile (cutting into fare revenue) but also end up with a lot of deadhead or reverse direction low ridership miles. Any fare increases should try and bring the fare recovery ratio more in line. I think this will do the opposite.

Right now the only decent connections from Totem Lake Flyer Stop to Bellevue Transit Center are the ST 532 and 535. Given these buses on the reverse commute run anywhere from 10-20 minutes (or more) behind schedule I can still live with the $1.50 fare but $2.50 ($5 a day) on the days I don&#039;t want to ride or want to go to DT Bellevue after work I&#039;ll just drive. I&#039;m willing to bet there are a lot of other short eastside connections like this that suffer. I guess overall ST won&#039;t lose much revenue with a decline of short hop riders but system wide it really sucks to see the capcity going to waste because the fare structure is skewed to favor long haul routes.

I know it would make the fare system even more convoluted but with ORCA it seems like it wouldn&#039;t be that hard to make fares demand based (i.e. the routes that are running full charge more and the routes that are essentially &quot;deadheading&quot; make it cheap). That&#039;s the way airlines, and most commercial transit would operate; demand and supply. Instead, ST has no Peak Fare policy at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yeah, I think this is an issue and fails to address the problem that the long haul busses have much lower boardings per mile (cutting into fare revenue) but also end up with a lot of deadhead or reverse direction low ridership miles. Any fare increases should try and bring the fare recovery ratio more in line. I think this will do the opposite.</p>
<p>Right now the only decent connections from Totem Lake Flyer Stop to Bellevue Transit Center are the ST 532 and 535. Given these buses on the reverse commute run anywhere from 10-20 minutes (or more) behind schedule I can still live with the $1.50 fare but $2.50 ($5 a day) on the days I don&#8217;t want to ride or want to go to DT Bellevue after work I&#8217;ll just drive. I&#8217;m willing to bet there are a lot of other short eastside connections like this that suffer. I guess overall ST won&#8217;t lose much revenue with a decline of short hop riders but system wide it really sucks to see the capcity going to waste because the fare structure is skewed to favor long haul routes.</p>
<p>I know it would make the fare system even more convoluted but with ORCA it seems like it wouldn&#8217;t be that hard to make fares demand based (i.e. the routes that are running full charge more and the routes that are essentially &#8220;deadheading&#8221; make it cheap). That&#8217;s the way airlines, and most commercial transit would operate; demand and supply. Instead, ST has no Peak Fare policy at all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110673</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110673</guid>
		<description>Wow, it looks like about a $4 surcharge for SFO, that&#039;s higher than the YVR surcharge on the Canada Line. Guess they&#039;re trying to recover the billion-and-a-half they spent bringing BART to SFO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Wow, it looks like about a $4 surcharge for SFO, that&#8217;s higher than the YVR surcharge on the Canada Line. Guess they&#8217;re trying to recover the billion-and-a-half they spent bringing BART to SFO.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orr</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110672</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110672</guid>
		<description>Yikes! It was only $5 or so last time I was there. Looking at the BART calculator (http://www.bart.gov/tickets/calculator/index.aspx), SFO has a huge surcharge. Montgomery to Millbrae (a slightly longer distance) is $4.25.  Millbrae to Berkeley or Fremont is $6.70. Millbrae to Coliseum (Oakland airport) is $4.95, but SFO to Coliseum is $8.80.

But the point is that you &lt;i&gt;could&lt;/i&gt; go to Pittsburg every 15 minutes and it would take only an hour or so. That&#039;s the added value you get. Whereas if you want to take Link to Tacoma, forget it.

If Link is extended to Tacoma and Everett, it would be similar to BART and a distance-based fare would be more justifiable. But that&#039;s not even on the construction schedule yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Yikes! It was only $5 or so last time I was there. Looking at the BART calculator (<a href="http://www.bart.gov/tickets/calculator/index.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.bart.gov/tickets/calculator/index.aspx</a>), SFO has a huge surcharge. Montgomery to Millbrae (a slightly longer distance) is $4.25.  Millbrae to Berkeley or Fremont is $6.70. Millbrae to Coliseum (Oakland airport) is $4.95, but SFO to Coliseum is $8.80.</p>
<p>But the point is that you <i>could</i> go to Pittsburg every 15 minutes and it would take only an hour or so. That&#8217;s the added value you get. Whereas if you want to take Link to Tacoma, forget it.</p>
<p>If Link is extended to Tacoma and Everett, it would be similar to BART and a distance-based fare would be more justifiable. But that&#8217;s not even on the construction schedule yet.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110666</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110666</guid>
		<description>Just took BART from SFO to downtown last week. $8.10 one-way, and it&#039;s only 13 miles. Definitely did not get more for my money. :-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Just took BART from SFO to downtown last week. $8.10 one-way, and it&#8217;s only 13 miles. Definitely did not get more for my money. :-0<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110663</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110663</guid>
		<description>If Central Link ever extends between Everett and Tacoma, the longest trip would be well over 60 miles. And since ST policy demands a higher fare recovery ratio for Link than ST Express, distance based fares would be very likely, like what Sounder is currently using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If Central Link ever extends between Everett and Tacoma, the longest trip would be well over 60 miles. And since ST policy demands a higher fare recovery ratio for Link than ST Express, distance based fares would be very likely, like what Sounder is currently using.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeloBusDriver</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110661</link>
		<dc:creator>VeloBusDriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110661</guid>
		<description>Most of the ST routes I drive are frequented by 2 zone customers.  The one big exception is the 522 where there are a significant number of one-zone passengers who will be affected by this fare increase.

Not sure about the 56x routes out of South since I&#039;ve never driven any of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Most of the ST routes I drive are frequented by 2 zone customers.  The one big exception is the 522 where there are a significant number of one-zone passengers who will be affected by this fare increase.</p>
<p>Not sure about the 56x routes out of South since I&#8217;ve never driven any of those.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/03/16/sound-transit-looking-at-changing-fare-structure/#comment-110660</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=13265#comment-110660</guid>
		<description>Its the same thing with Metro fares. I remember when when Metro 1 zone peak was 1.50 and 2 zone peak was $2.00 which is a 25 percent difference now its 2.25 and 2.75 which is less then a 20 percent difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Its the same thing with Metro fares. I remember when when Metro 1 zone peak was 1.50 and 2 zone peak was $2.00 which is a 25 percent difference now its 2.25 and 2.75 which is less then a 20 percent difference.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 424/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-25 23:48:32 -->
