Seattle Transit Blog

  • Snow info
  • Page 2
  • Best Posts
  • Useful Links
  • Seattle For Visitors
  • Archives
  • Donate
  • Search

More Link Service Interruptions this Weekend

May 11, 2010 at 6:45 am By Martin H. Duke

Photo by Erubisu SEA

Switch heater installation will  continue (and hopefully finish) this weekend, resulting in 30 minute headways from 10pm Friday through the close of business Sunday.  Link will be operating single-track from between Columbia City and Stadium, so riders will be directed to one platform.

This resumes the work that began at the end of April.  By taking a three-week break, Sound Transit avoided the entire Mariners and Sounders homestands, where weekend ridership is a bit higher.

The switch heaters are supposed to weatherproof the system in the event of another Snowpocalypse.  We got a little lucky in that El Niño prevented any serious weather this winter.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Support Seattle Transit Blog. Make a donation to help fund our work.

Comments

  1. Brent says

    May 11, 2010 at 7:38 am

    Could someone explain the mechanical reasons why Link can’t do night owl service (at least between Stadium and Airport Stations)?

    If it can’t, I still think it is important for Metro or ST to have a night owl shadow route, as there are a lot of airport employees who need it if they are to ride the other way at the other end of their shift. (It sure is nice having all those security workers taking advantage of the free transit rides.)

    It’s time for the transportation industry to look after the transportation needs of its own employees.

    • Brian Bundridge says

      May 11, 2010 at 7:48 am

      Brent,

      It comes down to cost for what little ridership there would be at that time of night and not enough vehicles to maintain a proper maintenance schedule to protect in the event of a vehicle failure while over the road.

      I would agree that a night shadow bus would be the best solution as the system gains riders but as it is, is it really worth to run a 40 foot coach for 4 hours for maybe a maximum of 30 people?

      • Adam B. Parast says

        May 11, 2010 at 8:12 am

        Actually I think it mostly comes down to the costs associate with keeping the tunnel open. ST doesn’t want to pay to keep it open for the trains. This is why *completely* agree that link shadow service should be operated all night using buses, at least on friday and saturday nights. Service should operate along the whole line going from station to station.

      • alexjonlin says

        May 11, 2010 at 9:13 am

        Could service on Friday and Saturday nights be extended to 2 or 2:30, with all night service on a new “87” every night?

      • Spencer says

        May 11, 2010 at 7:12 pm

        Regarding the buses shadowing the rail line: this actually happens in Berlin. The buses run on the surface between 12am and 4am, with about 7 buses running between those times.

        Here’s a link to one of the timetables that shows the bus route (N8) serving the same places as the subway route (U8): https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B5TqMM6-ZEIlNDIxMjMxZjAtNmU0ZS00OTJkLTlkNzktYTdjNWZkY2E2NWJk&hl=en

      • 47hasbegun says

        May 11, 2010 at 8:15 am

        Couldn’t they use one of the cutaway vans or something similar?

      • Brian Bundridge says

        May 11, 2010 at 11:08 am

        That would be the best thing they could do. Those new workhouse vans would be best.

      • Brent says

        May 11, 2010 at 11:29 am

        It doesn’t have to be all new service. It can be a slightly-rerouted extension of the #7 graveyard runs. If it can coordinate a hookup point with the 124 night owl runs, it doesn’t even have to be a one-seat ride to the airport (as long as the two buses are next to each other, letting passengers transfer between the buses).

        Nor is it adding just 30 passenger trips to the system. Their ability to catch Link home adds a total of 60 trips to the system. I suspect it’s actually more than that, but there’s no way to know without trying it for a while.

        If the 40-foot bus is too big, borrow an Access van.

        Cancel the 38 (which seems to carry fewer than 30 passengers all day on its 1-bus back-and-forth route between Beacon Hill and Mt Baker Station) as a place to find the revenue.

      • Evan says

        May 11, 2010 at 5:50 pm

        Better yet, cancel the useless 42. One organization shouldn’t be able to dictate Metro’s routes during lean times like this, especially one that’s completely redundant to Link and the 8. The 38 may be not well utilized, but it does offer service on a steep hill that some patrons can’t easily make it up or down to get to Link.

      • Mike Orr says

        May 13, 2010 at 10:49 am

        Unfortunately, deleting the 42 and 38 would look like disregarding the community’s preferences and ramming changes down their throats — bad news for politicians hoping to be reelected and bureaucracies trying to survive in this anti-tax climate. In the end we either have to convince the 42 supporters to love Link, or more easily, show that they are not speaking for the majority of residents in Rainier Valley.

  2. Brent says

    May 12, 2010 at 7:19 am

    I heard a partial recording of the announcement of service interruption coming Friday when I was at Westlake yesterday afternoon. It was interrupted mid-sentence by “The next train southbound…”, then continued on the original message, garbling the whole announcement.

    I do much appreciate the verbal warnings. There must be a cheap way to do temporary signs.

    • Oran Viriyincy says

      May 12, 2010 at 10:28 am

      Here’s a recording of that message:

      http://oran.hoshiru.net/files/transit/5-15_16-LinkMaintMsg.mp3

      Transcription: “May I have your attention please, from 10 p.m. Friday, May 14 until midnight Sunday, May 16, link [sic] will operate about every 30 minutes due to track maintenance.”

      There should be signs. Someone on my bus thought the message said the tunnel would be closed for the weekend!

      • Transit Guy says

        May 12, 2010 at 11:43 am

        Yup, message sounds about the same to me too….

        Look for stick-on signs on Link train windows, announcing the weekend service disruption.

Trackbacks

  1. Beacon Hill Blog » Archive » Beacon Bits: Landmark announcement, litter clean-up, and library survey says:
    May 12, 2010 at 5:04 am

    […] switch heater installation will again reduce Link Light Rail train intervals to approximately every 30 minutes from 10pm Friday through Sunday night. — Seattle Transit […]

About

Seattle Transit Blog is an independent, award-winning publication covering transit and land use issues in Seattle and the Puget Sound area since 2007. About Us | Advertise

Advertising



Search

Recent Posts

  • Can we replace cross-country air with rail travel? Yes, we can!
  • News Roundup: Exceeding Expectations
  • STB Meetup March 4
  • Community Transit Proposes Low-Income Fare
  • Emergency Snow Network to End at 4am Wednesday

Recently on Page 2

  • East Seattle Bus Restructure
  • Mobility Alternatives to the CCC
  • A Quick Multi-Modal Tour of Puget Sound
  • Transit Day: Rogue Valley (Medford, Ashland, Klamath Falls)
  • When will Kitsap County join Sound Transit?

Stay in Touch

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter
  • Flickr
  • Latest Comments

Frequent Transit Map


Your guide to frequent transit in Seattle

STB on Twitter

  • New SDOT Director confirmation moves forward https://t.co/wkthhGkPYH Yesterday at 9:42 pm
  • California high-speed rail and the American infrastructure tragedy, explained https://t.co/Kxms7rG0hX Yesterday at 7:40 pm
  • On the blog: Can we replace cross-country air with rail travel? Yes, we can! https://t.co/L05GUff4qp https://t.co/41mEypHePj Yesterday at 6:04 pm
  • Backlash stalls Edmonds’ housing strategy | https://t.co/pQFpI9Vt65 https://t.co/cXFDIPAsaL February 14, 2019 7:40 pm
  • Thread https://t.co/Q3McEl8i38 February 14, 2019 5:47 pm
  • Follow us on Twitter

Copyright © 2019 · Archives · Contact Us · Privacy policy · Assistance from Curvine Web Solutions · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.