May 13, 2010 at 12:15 pm

I-5 Undercrossing Wraps Up

Sound Transit today re-opened the Northbound I-5 Olive Way exit ramp marking the completion of major work on one of the first contracts as part of the University Link Light Rail extension. The exit was closed for a year-long project to prepare I-5 for the twin tunnels that will be bored underneath connecting University Link into the existing system.

Sound Transit reports the project was completed on-time and under budget despite earlier reports of being behind schedule, and considers this a great milestone for U-Link.

 Seattle Transit Blog logo Comments RSS feed |

Comment by lazarus
2010-05-13 12:36:56

I think they were expecting early on to be finished early, but in the end they finished on schedule and under budget.

Good job ST. Under budget is a good thing!

Bring on the TBM’s.

 
Comment by Tom
2010-05-13 12:55:39

More videos like this please. Congratulations to Sound Transit, we need to be very supportive of community investments like this one, they make us all wealthier .

Comment by joshuadf
2010-05-14 16:06:00

I’m glad for the work, but I was a little disappointed with the video. I though it was going to be video of the undercrossing work being done, like this pic I took
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshuadf/4277561880/

 
 
Comment by barman
2010-05-13 13:05:08

U-Link can’t come fast enough… I wish it were finished!!

 
Comment by Charles
2010-05-13 14:52:55

Great job guys!

 
Comment by alexjonlin
2010-05-13 19:14:55

I was wondering a while ago, will U Link tunnels be lit like the DSTT, or dark like a lot of systems around the world?

Comment by Oran Viriyincy
2010-05-13 20:52:15

It’ll probably be like the Beacon Hill tunnel.

 
Comment by Adam B. Parast
2010-05-14 00:16:44

The tunnels always have lights it’s just a matter of whether you want to pay to power them all the time.

 
 
Comment by Lloyd
2010-05-13 19:35:58

I’m certain current safety and escape requirements require lighting in all newly built transit tunnels

 
Comment by Gordon Werner
2010-05-13 23:26:43

Does this mean they can start running 3-car trains?

Comment by Adam B. Parast
2010-05-14 00:17:48

I thought they could already run 3-car trains.

Comment by Oran Viriyincy
2010-05-14 00:44:39

ST spokesperson Bruce Gray said last month that “we’ve moved up the bumping post in the stub tunnel since we opened last July to make room for the coming U-Link work. Now we can only turn a two-car train around in there.”

I don’t think they have enough cars to regularly run 3-car trains.

Comment by Gordon Werner
2010-05-14 00:53:09

maybe not regularly … but for games and such would be nice

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by alexjonlin
2010-05-14 09:07:58

They’re getting a lot of cars next year though right? That’d be cool to at least run three-car trains from Stadium Station after sports events around there.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Gordon Werner
2010-05-14 17:04:12

the new ones start arriving in August I believe …

 
Comment by John Bailo
2010-05-15 18:17:26

I don’t understand the logic for a tunnel versus elevated.

LINK has three modes: elevated, surface and tunnel.

They use the existing downtown tunnel…which makes sense there, but every else it seems to be the elevated would be the perfect combination of having a free right of way along with being cheap and easy to build.

Not only that, but I would imagine that an elevated line could be put up almost instantly whereas a tunnel takes forever to build.

Can someone school me in the (il)logic of tunnels?

Comment by DK
2010-05-16 07:04:26

Tunnels require little maintenance after they’re built. They’re essentially negative space inside solid rock. Elevated structures have to be constantly maintained. See NYC’s subway tunnels versus Chicago’s “L” system. Virtually no work has needed to be done to NYC’s tunnels in their 80-90 year history, whereas Chicago is constantly replacing segments of it’s elevated lines.

 
 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.