<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I-5 Undercrossing Wraps Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-119131</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 14:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-119131</guid>
		<description>Tunnels require little maintenance after they&#039;re built. They&#039;re essentially negative space inside solid rock. Elevated structures have to be constantly maintained. See NYC&#039;s subway tunnels versus Chicago&#039;s &quot;L&quot; system. Virtually no work has needed to be done to NYC&#039;s tunnels in their 80-90 year history, whereas Chicago is constantly replacing segments of it&#039;s elevated lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Tunnels require little maintenance after they&#8217;re built. They&#8217;re essentially negative space inside solid rock. Elevated structures have to be constantly maintained. See NYC&#8217;s subway tunnels versus Chicago&#8217;s &#8220;L&#8221; system. Virtually no work has needed to be done to NYC&#8217;s tunnels in their 80-90 year history, whereas Chicago is constantly replacing segments of it&#8217;s elevated lines.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bailo</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-119121</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bailo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 01:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-119121</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the logic for a tunnel versus elevated.

LINK has three modes:  elevated, surface and tunnel.

They use the existing downtown tunnel...which makes sense there, but every else it seems to be the elevated would be the perfect combination of having a free right of way along with being cheap and easy to build.

Not only that, but I would imagine that an elevated line could be put up almost instantly whereas a tunnel takes forever to build.

Can someone school me in the (il)logic of tunnels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I don&#8217;t understand the logic for a tunnel versus elevated.</p>
<p>LINK has three modes:  elevated, surface and tunnel.</p>
<p>They use the existing downtown tunnel&#8230;which makes sense there, but every else it seems to be the elevated would be the perfect combination of having a free right of way along with being cheap and easy to build.</p>
<p>Not only that, but I would imagine that an elevated line could be put up almost instantly whereas a tunnel takes forever to build.</p>
<p>Can someone school me in the (il)logic of tunnels?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Werner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-119046</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 00:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-119046</guid>
		<description>the new ones start arriving in August I believe ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
the new ones start arriving in August I believe &#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-119038</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-119038</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad for the work, but I was a little disappointed with the video. I though it was going to be video of the undercrossing work being done, like this pic I took
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshuadf/4277561880/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;m glad for the work, but I was a little disappointed with the video. I though it was going to be video of the undercrossing work being done, like this pic I took<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshuadf/4277561880/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshuadf/4277561880/</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-119006</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-119006</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re getting a lot of cars next year though right? That&#039;d be cool to at least run three-car trains from Stadium Station after sports events around there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
They&#8217;re getting a lot of cars next year though right? That&#8217;d be cool to at least run three-car trains from Stadium Station after sports events around there.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Werner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118992</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118992</guid>
		<description>maybe not regularly ... but for games and such would be nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
maybe not regularly &#8230; but for games and such would be nice<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118991</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118991</guid>
		<description>ST spokesperson Bruce Gray &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/04/15/link-ridership-up-8-in-march/#comment-115234&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;said last month&lt;/a&gt; that &quot;we’ve moved up the bumping post in the stub tunnel since we opened last July to make room for the coming U-Link work. Now we can only turn a two-car train around in there.&quot;

I don&#039;t think they have enough cars to regularly run 3-car trains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
ST spokesperson Bruce Gray <a href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/04/15/link-ridership-up-8-in-march/#comment-115234" rel="nofollow">said last month</a> that &#8220;we’ve moved up the bumping post in the stub tunnel since we opened last July to make room for the coming U-Link work. Now we can only turn a two-car train around in there.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they have enough cars to regularly run 3-car trains.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam B. Parast</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118989</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam B. Parast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118989</guid>
		<description>I thought they could already run 3-car trains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I thought they could already run 3-car trains.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam B. Parast</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118988</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam B. Parast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118988</guid>
		<description>The tunnels always have lights it&#039;s just a matter of whether you want to pay to power them all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The tunnels always have lights it&#8217;s just a matter of whether you want to pay to power them all the time.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Werner</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118987</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 06:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118987</guid>
		<description>Does this mean they can start running 3-car trains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Does this mean they can start running 3-car trains?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118985</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 03:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118985</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll probably be like the Beacon Hill tunnel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It&#8217;ll probably be like the Beacon Hill tunnel.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118980</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118980</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certain current safety and escape requirements require lighting in all newly built transit tunnels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I&#8217;m certain current safety and escape requirements require lighting in all newly built transit tunnels<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexjonlin</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118978</link>
		<dc:creator>alexjonlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118978</guid>
		<description>I was wondering a while ago, will U Link tunnels be lit like the DSTT, or dark like a lot of systems around the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I was wondering a while ago, will U Link tunnels be lit like the DSTT, or dark like a lot of systems around the world?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118975</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 21:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118975</guid>
		<description>Great job guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Great job guys!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barman</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118971</link>
		<dc:creator>barman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118971</guid>
		<description>U-Link can&#039;t come fast enough... I wish it were finished!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
U-Link can&#8217;t come fast enough&#8230; I wish it were finished!!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118970</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118970</guid>
		<description>More videos like this please. Congratulations to Sound Transit, we need to be very supportive of community investments like this one, &lt;strong&gt;they make us all wealthier &lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
More videos like this please. Congratulations to Sound Transit, we need to be very supportive of community investments like this one, <strong>they make us all wealthier </strong>.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazarus</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/05/13/i-5-undercrossing-wraps-up/#comment-118969</link>
		<dc:creator>lazarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=14833#comment-118969</guid>
		<description>I think they were expecting early on to be finished early, but in the end they finished on schedule and under budget.  

Good job ST.  Under budget is a good thing!

Bring on the TBM&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I think they were expecting early on to be finished early, but in the end they finished on schedule and under budget.  </p>
<p>Good job ST.  Under budget is a good thing!</p>
<p>Bring on the TBM&#8217;s.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 381/386 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-26 02:25:25 -->
