<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORCA Sometimes Feels Half-Engineered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/</link>
	<description>Transit in the Greater Seattle Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innocent Bystander</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128719</link>
		<dc:creator>Innocent Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128719</guid>
		<description>OK, here&#039;s a subtlety.  The premise is that ORCA&#039;s problems are from under-engineering.  But my perception is that the project was *over*-engineered, not under.  Rather than to purchase an off-the shelf product that had been refined based on industry experience elsewhere, the ORCA approach was to design a specification from the ground up, producing a huge spec that required a ton of custom and non-reusable product development.  There were tons of potential agency requirements identified, but are Puget Sound transit agency needs that different from the rest of the industry?  Why not let the industry do some of the development and testing, rather than to engineer our own solution?

Most of the development effort was focused on a non-problem -- improving the reconciliation for transfers between agencies.  The other focus was to make sure agencies were not forced to rationalize or integrate their fare systems at all, so the ORCA system needed to accommodate each agency&#039;s separate fare structures and business rules (despite fare integration having been one of Sound Transit&#039;s initial charges).  Customer needs were not represented as directly in the design process (especially customers who want to transfer between bus and rail, and don&#039;t want to maintain a pre-paid balance).  With all the attention on agency needs, and little on the customers&#039;, it&#039;s not surprising that some customer service issues remain.  So in a sense it&#039;s fair to say it was half-engineered (since the customer needs weren&#039;t a major factor in the design process), but I think in fact the over-engineering to meet every possible agency platform requirement was the biggest factor resulting in some drawbacks to the customer experience in implementation.  Personally, I&#039;m actually surprised that the system is working as well as it has so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
OK, here&#8217;s a subtlety.  The premise is that ORCA&#8217;s problems are from under-engineering.  But my perception is that the project was *over*-engineered, not under.  Rather than to purchase an off-the shelf product that had been refined based on industry experience elsewhere, the ORCA approach was to design a specification from the ground up, producing a huge spec that required a ton of custom and non-reusable product development.  There were tons of potential agency requirements identified, but are Puget Sound transit agency needs that different from the rest of the industry?  Why not let the industry do some of the development and testing, rather than to engineer our own solution?</p>
<p>Most of the development effort was focused on a non-problem &#8212; improving the reconciliation for transfers between agencies.  The other focus was to make sure agencies were not forced to rationalize or integrate their fare systems at all, so the ORCA system needed to accommodate each agency&#8217;s separate fare structures and business rules (despite fare integration having been one of Sound Transit&#8217;s initial charges).  Customer needs were not represented as directly in the design process (especially customers who want to transfer between bus and rail, and don&#8217;t want to maintain a pre-paid balance).  With all the attention on agency needs, and little on the customers&#8217;, it&#8217;s not surprising that some customer service issues remain.  So in a sense it&#8217;s fair to say it was half-engineered (since the customer needs weren&#8217;t a major factor in the design process), but I think in fact the over-engineering to meet every possible agency platform requirement was the biggest factor resulting in some drawbacks to the customer experience in implementation.  Personally, I&#8217;m actually surprised that the system is working as well as it has so far.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128715</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128715</guid>
		<description>The delay between loading your card online and when it gets to your card (24 hrs) is mainly due to how the system receives the information about your order. WSF and WSDOT systems are hardwired so that the order is transmitted right away where as each bus uses a physical transmitter that picks up your order when it passed a transmitter at the bases and is uploaded to the ORCA machine onboard. The files are uploaded to the base transmitters twice in a 24 hr period so hopefully, if the driver set the machine correctly, can be uploaded to the bus morning and night as they enter and leave the bus bases.

Regarding WSF product offered -  that is the decision of WSF to offer those products and only those products on the ORCA card, not the ORCA people. Same reason for Car and Driver/Motercycles, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
The delay between loading your card online and when it gets to your card (24 hrs) is mainly due to how the system receives the information about your order. WSF and WSDOT systems are hardwired so that the order is transmitted right away where as each bus uses a physical transmitter that picks up your order when it passed a transmitter at the bases and is uploaded to the ORCA machine onboard. The files are uploaded to the base transmitters twice in a 24 hr period so hopefully, if the driver set the machine correctly, can be uploaded to the bus morning and night as they enter and leave the bus bases.</p>
<p>Regarding WSF product offered &#8211;  that is the decision of WSF to offer those products and only those products on the ORCA card, not the ORCA people. Same reason for Car and Driver/Motercycles, etc.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128714</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128714</guid>
		<description>From what I understamd when the same thing happened to me months ago was that there was an issue with some of the TVM&#039;s issuing cards but not recording them with the main computer so the main computer had no record of the card being issued. I took mine into the office at Jackson street and they switched me out with a new card once I explained the situation. A bunch of other people were having to do the same thing at that time as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
From what I understamd when the same thing happened to me months ago was that there was an issue with some of the TVM&#8217;s issuing cards but not recording them with the main computer so the main computer had no record of the card being issued. I took mine into the office at Jackson street and they switched me out with a new card once I explained the situation. A bunch of other people were having to do the same thing at that time as well.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128594</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128594</guid>
		<description>Many academics  broke the encryption to Mifare Classic which is used in many systems like Boston&#039;s CharlieCard and London Oyster. That&#039;s why you haven&#039;t seen the disposable ORCA ticket yet because that card stock uses the older, weaker encryption, until recently. ORCA uses Mifare DESfire which supports DES encryption or the much stronger 128-bit AES encryption. If AES is broken we have greater things to worry about than people getting free rides but of course there may be other security vulnerabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Many academics  broke the encryption to Mifare Classic which is used in many systems like Boston&#8217;s CharlieCard and London Oyster. That&#8217;s why you haven&#8217;t seen the disposable ORCA ticket yet because that card stock uses the older, weaker encryption, until recently. ORCA uses Mifare DESfire which supports DES encryption or the much stronger 128-bit AES encryption. If AES is broken we have greater things to worry about than people getting free rides but of course there may be other security vulnerabilities.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oran Viriyincy</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128590</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran Viriyincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128590</guid>
		<description>Nope, all the value is stored on the card encrypted including a record of the 10 last trips you made. The buses don&#039;t have a constant connection to the central database which means it can only be updated once a day when the bus is at base, then the updates are pushed to the card next time it&#039;s tapped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Nope, all the value is stored on the card encrypted including a record of the 10 last trips you made. The buses don&#8217;t have a constant connection to the central database which means it can only be updated once a day when the bus is at base, then the updates are pushed to the card next time it&#8217;s tapped.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lack Thereof</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128550</link>
		<dc:creator>Lack Thereof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128550</guid>
		<description>There isn&#039;t a secure, commercially available implementation of the disposable magstripe.  Even though it&#039;s totally technically feasible.  All of the systems that use it are wide open to fraud.  

The supposedly secure, encrypted magstripes on their paper tickets/transfers are actually very poorly secured - there&#039;s only a very basic checksum, and you can&#039;t really call that secured at all, since you can just recalculate a valid checksum for any changes you make.

That was a big part of a pretty well known &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=3&amp;ved=0CBwQFjAC&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftech.mit.edu%2FV128%2FN30%2Fsubway%2FDefcon_Presentation.pdf&amp;ei=m2NRTLC7KobWtQPm24EM&amp;usg=AFQjCNFmD89S-OAwbAApoGOsr0Vga5lk1w&amp;sig2=Unx7hUOKnFedXXr1ctogQQ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Defcon talk a few years back&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s trivial to forge a magstripe that gives you free rides for life, with $5 of off-the-shelf equipment.

The RFID cards (like Orca) aren&#039;t much stronger.  The encryption is almost trivially weak, but the equipment needed is 10x more expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
There isn&#8217;t a secure, commercially available implementation of the disposable magstripe.  Even though it&#8217;s totally technically feasible.  All of the systems that use it are wide open to fraud.  </p>
<p>The supposedly secure, encrypted magstripes on their paper tickets/transfers are actually very poorly secured &#8211; there&#8217;s only a very basic checksum, and you can&#8217;t really call that secured at all, since you can just recalculate a valid checksum for any changes you make.</p>
<p>That was a big part of a pretty well known <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=3&amp;ved=0CBwQFjAC&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftech.mit.edu%2FV128%2FN30%2Fsubway%2FDefcon_Presentation.pdf&amp;ei=m2NRTLC7KobWtQPm24EM&amp;usg=AFQjCNFmD89S-OAwbAApoGOsr0Vga5lk1w&amp;sig2=Unx7hUOKnFedXXr1ctogQQ" rel="nofollow">Defcon talk a few years back</a>.  It&#8217;s trivial to forge a magstripe that gives you free rides for life, with $5 of off-the-shelf equipment.</p>
<p>The RFID cards (like Orca) aren&#8217;t much stronger.  The encryption is almost trivially weak, but the equipment needed is 10x more expensive.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lack Thereof</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128549</link>
		<dc:creator>Lack Thereof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128549</guid>
		<description>What if you hopped Link from somewhere in S. Seattle, to transfer to a cross-lake bus?  That&#039;s pretty obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
What if you hopped Link from somewhere in S. Seattle, to transfer to a cross-lake bus?  That&#8217;s pretty obvious.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith T.</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128545</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128545</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The excuse is that a kiosk or window can update the database in your card to reflect the new money/pass, but when you do it online that’s obviously not possible. &lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s not at all how it works. Imagine if there was a database on the card. Not only would that make these cards much more expensive than they already are, but it wouldn&#039;t take long for enterprising digital tinkerers to figure out how to edit that database to contain $999,999.99! Systems in NYC and Boston that contained value on the card have been hacked in just that way.

No, I&#039;m pretty sure the ORCA card is mostly just a chip with a unique number, and the only thing the card &quot;knows&quot; is that it is Card Number 00343452873462345 or whatever. Maybe it&#039;s more than that, but I&#039;m pretty certain it doesn&#039;t contain how much is in your epurse or what passes you have. It tells the reader what its number is and the reader looks that number up in an ST central database to get your epurse and pass info.

Which means there&#039;s no reason at all why the online system can&#039;t update your purse info much sooner than 24 hours.

Even if this were the case -- that the value was stored on the card -- why couldn&#039;t it update immediately upon my using it at a reader? It will after 24 hours, but not before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<i>The excuse is that a kiosk or window can update the database in your card to reflect the new money/pass, but when you do it online that’s obviously not possible. </i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s not at all how it works. Imagine if there was a database on the card. Not only would that make these cards much more expensive than they already are, but it wouldn&#8217;t take long for enterprising digital tinkerers to figure out how to edit that database to contain $999,999.99! Systems in NYC and Boston that contained value on the card have been hacked in just that way.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m pretty sure the ORCA card is mostly just a chip with a unique number, and the only thing the card &#8220;knows&#8221; is that it is Card Number 00343452873462345 or whatever. Maybe it&#8217;s more than that, but I&#8217;m pretty certain it doesn&#8217;t contain how much is in your epurse or what passes you have. It tells the reader what its number is and the reader looks that number up in an ST central database to get your epurse and pass info.</p>
<p>Which means there&#8217;s no reason at all why the online system can&#8217;t update your purse info much sooner than 24 hours.</p>
<p>Even if this were the case &#8212; that the value was stored on the card &#8212; why couldn&#8217;t it update immediately upon my using it at a reader? It will after 24 hours, but not before.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TransitGeek</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128544</link>
		<dc:creator>TransitGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128544</guid>
		<description>Your credit card expiring does&#039;t seem like an ORCA caused problem.  Do you expect Safeway or Macy&#039;s to tell you when your card is about to expire?

It also seems you should be glad they don&#039;t just cancel your card for non-payment.  You and you rkids kept riding, then a tax-payer paid employee had to &#039;handle&#039; your card expiration issue.  That seems like a waste of my tax money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Your credit card expiring does&#8217;t seem like an ORCA caused problem.  Do you expect Safeway or Macy&#8217;s to tell you when your card is about to expire?</p>
<p>It also seems you should be glad they don&#8217;t just cancel your card for non-payment.  You and you rkids kept riding, then a tax-payer paid employee had to &#8216;handle&#8217; your card expiration issue.  That seems like a waste of my tax money.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith T.</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128543</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128543</guid>
		<description>For starters, I wanted to avoid the lines that pile up at TVMs. I was planning to take the Link in for a Mariners game.

But let&#039;s say it wasn&#039;t Link I was planning to take, but a bus. And I don&#039;t have $2.50 in exact change lying around and won&#039;t be able to go to a bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
For starters, I wanted to avoid the lines that pile up at TVMs. I was planning to take the Link in for a Mariners game.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s say it wasn&#8217;t Link I was planning to take, but a bus. And I don&#8217;t have $2.50 in exact change lying around and won&#8217;t be able to go to a bank.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128526</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128526</guid>
		<description>If you have a pass, just tap when you enter the station. It&#039;s not like you would be out any extra money if you are tapping a pass in the ride-free area. I guess I don&#039;t see what the problem is for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
If you have a pass, just tap when you enter the station. It&#8217;s not like you would be out any extra money if you are tapping a pass in the ride-free area. I guess I don&#8217;t see what the problem is for you.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Kelley</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128524</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128524</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t recall how I did it, but when I was working for NWCN, I got a free Orca annual pass, which I added to my account. When I moved downstairs to KING, I had to get a different card, so I called or e-mailed and had the NWCN card removed from my account online. Was done pretty quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I don&#8217;t recall how I did it, but when I was working for NWCN, I got a free Orca annual pass, which I added to my account. When I moved downstairs to KING, I had to get a different card, so I called or e-mailed and had the NWCN card removed from my account online. Was done pretty quick.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128522</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128522</guid>
		<description>Because i have a pass, and i dont care about transfers, and want to traverse downtown as quickly as possible and not play the bus or train game, even though i know i&#039;m not going to get fare inspected in the tunnel, but still wanting to make sure i dont have to fork over $124 to Sound Transit needlessly.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Because i have a pass, and i dont care about transfers, and want to traverse downtown as quickly as possible and not play the bus or train game, even though i know i&#8217;m not going to get fare inspected in the tunnel, but still wanting to make sure i dont have to fork over $124 to Sound Transit needlessly&#8230;..<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128515</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128515</guid>
		<description>Okay? Why would you get off one stop later if you&#039;re just trying to get through town? In fact, it would be to your disadvantage to get on Link as that is pay as you enter and the bus would be pay as you leave, gaining you time on your transfer, assuming you are leaving the ride-free zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Okay? Why would you get off one stop later if you&#8217;re just trying to get through town? In fact, it would be to your disadvantage to get on Link as that is pay as you enter and the bus would be pay as you leave, gaining you time on your transfer, assuming you are leaving the ride-free zone.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128509</link>
		<dc:creator>James Maxwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128509</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just it. The &quot;Swipe twice&quot; works because that&#039;s what people expect when traveling with two people. And when I tap, I look at what the screen says to not only make sure it took, but to check my balance. And yes, it was Link but I knowing this next time in town I&#039;ll do things differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
That&#8217;s just it. The &#8220;Swipe twice&#8221; works because that&#8217;s what people expect when traveling with two people. And when I tap, I look at what the screen says to not only make sure it took, but to check my balance. And yes, it was Link but I knowing this next time in town I&#8217;ll do things differently.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128508</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128508</guid>
		<description>A Link or Sounder paper ticket isn&#039;t a transfer to any buses or trains. And if you have multiple transfers on your ORCA from the bus, when you get to Link they&#039;re absolutely useless. Multiple fares &amp; transfers are doable on buses, but once you try to go multi-modal, the system breaks down. So much for seamless transfers with ORCA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
A Link or Sounder paper ticket isn&#8217;t a transfer to any buses or trains. And if you have multiple transfers on your ORCA from the bus, when you get to Link they&#8217;re absolutely useless. Multiple fares &amp; transfers are doable on buses, but once you try to go multi-modal, the system breaks down. So much for seamless transfers with ORCA.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128507</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128507</guid>
		<description>They should have implemented a dual system with ORCA. fareboxes with electronic transfer printers like vancouver bc (or any number of other urban systems) and ORCA itself. Those paying with cash, would get an electronicly printed transfer/reciept with full transfer benefits of orca, and those regular riders could use their orca. By having the electronic transfers, it takes the operator out of the fare evasion problem &quot;the machines issues and accepts or rejects the transfer&quot;. Also, more though should have been given to having 24/7 telephone support for ORCA plus longer hours at major customer service shops. Adding ORCA TVMs at major transit stations and park and ride locations would have also been a good thing as well. But all it takes is $$$, and when your ten years behind schedule as it was...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
They should have implemented a dual system with ORCA. fareboxes with electronic transfer printers like vancouver bc (or any number of other urban systems) and ORCA itself. Those paying with cash, would get an electronicly printed transfer/reciept with full transfer benefits of orca, and those regular riders could use their orca. By having the electronic transfers, it takes the operator out of the fare evasion problem &#8220;the machines issues and accepts or rejects the transfer&#8221;. Also, more though should have been given to having 24/7 telephone support for ORCA plus longer hours at major customer service shops. Adding ORCA TVMs at major transit stations and park and ride locations would have also been a good thing as well. But all it takes is $$$, and when your ten years behind schedule as it was&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128506</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128506</guid>
		<description>what if you were just trying to move through downtown and wanted to take the next coming vehicle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
what if you were just trying to move through downtown and wanted to take the next coming vehicle?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128504</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128504</guid>
		<description>These are not off the shelf systems though, each one is tylor made for each customer (or customers) and there probally is a lot of politicing to hassle with especially in a system of our size and complexity.

One has to wonder though if ST&#039;s POP checkers on LINK will ticket you if you board at a station where the stand alone readers are not working properly. i heard they will....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
These are not off the shelf systems though, each one is tylor made for each customer (or customers) and there probally is a lot of politicing to hassle with especially in a system of our size and complexity.</p>
<p>One has to wonder though if ST&#8217;s POP checkers on LINK will ticket you if you board at a station where the stand alone readers are not working properly. i heard they will&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://seattletransitblog.com/2010/07/28/orca-sometimes-feels-half-engineered/#comment-128501</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seattletransitblog.com/?p=16937#comment-128501</guid>
		<description>I guess the question would be why are you riding Link one stop and getting off to take a bus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
I guess the question would be why are you riding Link one stop and getting off to take a bus?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 424/428 objects using disk

Served from: seattletransitblog.com @ 2012-05-26 03:37:39 -->
