Light Rail, Jim Ellis and the ST board

Streetcars and buses are great, but the we still need real rapid transit and in this region that means light rail. As we know, the Sound Transit Board is meeting today to discuss the future for light rail, the main question being whether to come back to the ballot in 2008 or later.

David Brewster at Crosscut seems sure it will only come back in 2010. I’m not so sure. I think if Dino Rossi moves into the governor’s mansion in 2009, there won’t be a Sound Transit in 2010 to go to the ballot. That Brewster piece about Jim Ellis is fascinating btw.

7 comments

More No. 8 buses

According to this there will be more no. 8 service along with more no. 70 bus service. The 70 will run every ten minutes, and the 8, which I sometimes take from Denny and Stewart when it’s raining, will start running every 15 minutes from 6-7:30 up from 30 minutes.

What’s interesting is that $109,000 of the approx. $800,000 needed to fund the increased service comes from SLU business. Seems scary to me, like wealthy business can throw money at the city and the city will buy them more bus service. What do you think, should we worry about county bus service for hire?

7 comments

Steel Electric Ferries

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Amid all this streetcar hubub, I’ve been remiss in not talking about the emerging crisis with respect to the Steel Electric ferries that service the Port Townsend-Keystone route. The 80-year-old ferries have been pulled from service and are unlikely to return.

The Everett Herald has been all over this story, and it seems like a pretty big screw-up at all levels. The state legislature approved replacements in 2001, but the replacements were too large to dock at Keystone! So now we’re looking at 16 months or so before a local shipbuilder can design and build new boats.

In the meantime, the 90-minute passenger-only ferry being proposed from Seattle to Pt. Townsend sounds great. I’d make a weekend of that.

In a press conference today, Gov. Gregoire announced plans to build three new ferries at a cost of $100M by borrowing money from other ferry projects. The passenger ferry from Seattle will begin service in January.

Fun Fact: These ferries were built in 1927 to move people around the San Francisco Bay. When the Golden Gate and Bay Bridges were built, they were sold to the Puget Sound Navigation company and renamed (via Wikipedia).

0 comments

The No. 8 Bus

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

The No. 8 bus, scourge of many, will get more service above and beyond TransitNow, due to a partership with the city and some local businesses:

The Route 8 bus, which runs east and west on Denny Way, between Capitol Hill — past South Lake Union– and Queen Anne will come every 15 minutes between 6 and 7:30 p.m., instead of every half-hour.

The city, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Vulcan, Group Health and REI are each giving $21,800 to the expansion over the next two years.

“It’s going to help,” [Gretchen] DeGroot said as she waited for the No. 8 on First Avenue near Denny Way. It was 6:15 p.m., and the next bus was scheduled to arrive about 6:35 p.m. “The fun thing about the 8 is you never know when it’s going to come.

Anecdotally, it seems that reliability, not frequency, is the No. 8’s problem, as Ms. DeGroot suggests. And that’s not really the Metro’s problem, it’s the fact that Denny Way is a tough cookie of a street. I give SDOT and Metro props for doing the best with it. The light timings are acually pretty good, and they’ve all but eliminated the ability to make backup-inducing left-hand turns.

Yet, as Denny Way transforms from parking lots and gas stations to apartments and retail, the traffic is likely to increase. Will the extra No. 8 buses help, or will they just stack up 2 and 3 deep during rush hour? It’s getting to the point where it’s almost as fast to ride the No. 2 or No. 3 buses from Queen Anne, through downtown, and up Capitol Hill than to take your chances with the No. 8.

Lowering Aurora Avenue and reconnecting the street grid between Queen Anne and South Lake Union will help disperse traffic, but that project is still years off. In the meantime, it will be interesting to see how the added bus service helps.

0 comments

Air France to start codesharing with Alaska

Air France today announced it’ll begin codesharing on Alaska Airlines’ flights out of Seattle to 18 cities starting 05JAN08.

Flight numbers and bookings will be available starting 15DEC07.

Air France will place its “AF” code to the following destinations:
Alaska
Anchorage
Fairbanks
Juneau
Ketchikan

California
Sacramento

Idaho
Boise

Montana
Bozeman
Kalispell
Missoula

Nevada
Reno

Oregon
Eugene
Medford
Portland
Redmond

Washington
Bellingham
Pasco
Pullman
Spokane

1 comments

What Might Have been

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

It’s a day of nostalgia, apparently.

David Brewster interviews Seattle civic legend Jim Ellis, who worked on the 1968 “Forward Thrust” bond package:

The Forward Thrust package in 1968 would have given the area a system of amazing scope. It would have been completed in 1985 and fully paid off in 2008. It would have been heavy rail, largely in subways, with two prongs north, two prongs south, and two prongs on the Eastside. Unlike Portland’s system, which is largely on the street, this system would have been separated from traffic and much faster. It probably would have done a fair amount toward shaping dense neighborhoods and concentrating urban growth. All this at one quarter the local cost of a completed (much smaller and slower) Sound Transit system.

Elsewhere, Seattle Metblogs reminds us that the Green Line — the first line of the monorail system, was set to open December 15, 2007, otherwise known as this Saturday

IIRC, the Monorail folks eventually punted on that start date, saying that htey’d have a starter line open by then, but that it would take a couple more years to get all the way to West Seattle and Ballard.

But that’s all water under the (crumbling) bridge.

0 comments

Lake Union Water Taxi

Here is something I simply had no idea that existed.

The Lake Union Water Taxi which serves two route; The Westlake – Fremont, Westlake @ The Electric Boat Company, and the Center of Wooden Boats and the Eastlake – Marriott/Chandlers, E Newton, Ivars @ Wallingford, and UW/Agua Verde in Portage Bay.

The rate is cheap at $3 one way or $5 round trip for either route and the crossing with a stop takes about 30 minutes on the Eastlake Route and about 20 minutes for the Westlake Route with one stop. The schedule is limited to Rush Hour and both locations serve the Seattle Streetcar stations with a short walk to and from. The boats are all electric, heated, and enclosed

Their website says September 10 – November 23, 2007 Monday – Friday Only. I’m not sure how long they have been around but it is a start to the King County Passenger Ferry service.

For more information, check out their website!

http://www.lakeunionwatertaxi.com/index.html

0 comments

Ball Bearings placed in Seattle Streetcar tracks

The only mishap was at 5 p.m., when a train was jolted by a ball bearing, a bit bigger than a golf ball, that was found wedged in the track along Terry Avenue North. Police located a few more, and the train was delayed 10 minutes, Daniels said.

Sad that someone would try to “derail” the train like this….

Thanks to the Seattle Times for this.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004068617_streetcar13m.html

Update:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004069374_webstreetcar13m.html

1 comments

Expanded bus service coming to South Lake Union

In addition to the Seattle Streetcar, expanded Metro Transit service is coming to South Lake Union beginning Feb. 11, 2008

  • Route 70 buses, which now run from the University District, past South Lake Union and then downtown every 15 minutes will arrive every 10 minutes between 3 and 6 p.m. on weekdays.
  • The Route 8 bus, which runs east and west on Denny Way, between Capitol Hill — past South Lake Union– and Queen Anne will come every 15 minutes between 6 and 7:30 p.m., instead of every half-hour.
  • South Lake Union businesses and the city of Seattle are contributing $109,000 toward the $817,000 needed to expand bus service on two routes.

While this is an improvement, the Route 8 runs on the heavily congested Denny Way, simply adding to the traffic mess on the road. While this is welcomed, more needs to be done besides adding more service. The Route 70 is plagued with traffic on Eastlake Avenue. Both of these roads needs to be expanded before improved bus service will be noticeable.

More from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer

0 comments

Viaduct Meeting Tomorrow

It’s not a public comment meeting, but you could submit a written comment and listen to the latest thinking:

The State, King County and the City of Seattle are working together to create a solution for the central waterfront section that can be broadly supported and implemented. Our intention is to develop a recommended approach in December 2008 for consideration by the legislature in 2009.

A key part of this effort is the creation of the new Stakeholder Advisory Committee, which was formed by Governor Chris Gregoire, King County Executive Ron Sims, and Mayor Greg Nickels. The committee will be made up of 30 individuals representing various constituencies and community groups throughout King County. WSDOT, KCDOT and SDOT will lead the committee to engage key stakeholders, listen to ideas, and conduct a transparent public involvement process over the next year.

The first committee meeting will be held Thursday, Dec. 13, 4 to 7 p.m. at Town Hall in Seattle. The meeting is open to the public, but it will not be a forum for open comment. The public is invited to submit written comments at the meeting or through viaduct@wsdot.wa.gov. Comments can also be submitted at any time on our hotline, 1-888-AWV-LINE. For more information, please visit the Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program Web site.

Anyone who attends is encouraged to report about it in this post’s comments.

1 comments

Snohomish County BRT (Swift)

I’d like to expand on Daimajin’s short comments about Snohomish BRT. First of all, you can find a lot more info than the Times article here. It’s a big improvement over King County’s plans, although of course the geographic scope is smaller.

Kudos to Snohomish County leaders for getting this done with an electorate that is generally less transit-friendly than King County. Bonus points for getting it done without a tax or fare increase, and not taking it through a laborious public vote.

The project should be done in 2009. King County’s version, RapidRide, won’t have its earliest portion done before 2010 despite being launched over a year earlier. It will mesh quite nicely with RapidRide’s Aurora Service, terminating at Aurora Village. People living along this corridor can access jobs in places like Fremont far faster than the current best option of going downtown, and then back north.

Swift would appear to have the same features as RapidRide, except:

  • The 10-minute headways will be 20 hours a day (instead of peak-only).
  • It has on-board bike racks served by their own door(!)
  • Ticket machines are at the stations, while RapidRide envisions that passengers will still fumble for change on board.
  • Seven miles of the route will actually be bus-only instead of HOV. Anyone who’s ridden 405 Northbound in the afternoon can tell you the difference, although Swift will still have to deal with the usual idiots trying to turn right.

I really wish the people responsible for this were running the BRT shop at Metro. They seem to be doing a lot more with a lot less, at least in this narrow case.

But in spite of all the things they’ve done right, it’s still not light rail. An 80-passenger bus every 10 minutes is nothing like an 800-passenger train every six in terms of capacity, and therefore has dramatically lower potential for high-density development along the line. It also will not be truly separated from traffic. At the same time, what they’ve done here is about as much as you can do with buses before you start to approach the cost of rail.

In the long run, light rail can be run with four or two-minute headways. Buses can’t, because the timing is unreliable and they end up bunched up (See: Metro Route 48). Bigger trains, shorter headways: Light Rail moves a lot more people than BRT, even when BRT is done right.

But BRT is a good option for a corridor that won’t see rail for a long, long time.

UPDATE: Reading between the lines more carefully, I should point out one weakness in the plan: apparently, the ten miles of the line that are not bus-only lanes are general purpose lanes. Given the rather tight constraints they were under, I still think they did a really good job. It’s just not quite as much of a slam dunk over RapidRide.

6 comments

Streetcar Opens

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

IMG_0813.jpg
IMG_0814.jpg

I snapped the photos above on my way to lunch at Whole Foods today. The sight of that many people cramming themsevles into a public transit vehicle for no real reason speaks volumes about why people prefer trains to buses.

Here’s an eyewitness report from a reader on the scene downtown:

I’m kicking myself for not having brought my camera to work today. My
office is at 6th & Stewart, and we have a great bird’s-eye view of the tiny rally for the SLUT’s inaugural passenger run.

At one point, several Metro buses and the Monorail were passing through that intersection while bike messengers circled the crowd and workers from a nearby daycare steered what looked like a miniature hay wagon stuffed with toddlers — it would have made a great “Spot the alternative modes of transportation!” game. (“Spot the VIABLE modes” would have been a much shorter round, unfortunately.)

They’re getting ready to do a second run on the Purple line. The crowd has mostly dispersed, revealing what appears to be a balding man in a skirt doing a celebratory scarf dance. (Not helping the cause, dude.)

What, no rickshaws? I’m disappointed, Seattle.

0 comments

SWIFT BRT

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Station.jpg

It hasn’t gotten nearly as much press as the Seattle Streetcar, but Community Transit in Snohomish County is working on a bus rapid transit system along Highway 99 that could be very successful, and will serve a lot more people. Swift will connect downtown Everett with the Aurora Transit Center, starting in 2009.

It has all the trappings of a good BRT system:

  • stations that are well spaced out (so it doesn’t have to stop every 2 blocks)
  • real-time bus information
  • ticket vending machines (so people don’t fiddle with change and waste the driver’s time)
  • dedicated right-of-way
  • roomy, low-floor buses (easy wheelchair access, onboard bus racks!)
  • signal priority

It’s all possible due to a collaboration between Community Transit and Everett Transit, Today’s Seattle Times notes:

CT and Everett last week transformed decades of struggle — including repeated attempts in the state Legislature to forcibly merge the two bus systems — into a display of harmony as they formalized plans to create a “trainlike” bus system along their shared Highway 99 corridor.

Further south, WSDOT has been building dedicated transit lanes on Aurora Ave in Shoreline. Phase 1 is complete, and Phase 2 will finish in 2012. So, when King County gets RapidRide going, we’ll have BRT all the way from Everett to Seattle along Highway 99.

Will it be as good as light rail from Seattle to Everett? No, of course not. There’s still the issue of crossing the Aurora Bridge, for example, without getting stuck in traffic. And an 80-passenger bus is more expensive to operate than a 400-passenger train. And (presumably) the Swift buses will have to move into general traffic lanes to bypass the slower local buses. And it’s still a bus. And on, and on…

But despite all that, it’s still got the potential to be a solid transit alternative. Sound Transit’s plan wouldn’t have gotten light rail all the way to Everett even by 2027. So having something up and running, even by 2012, is certainly welcome.

Photo “borrowed” from Community Transit’s web site.

0 comments

Viaduct Idea


Via Slog, the Governor says the viaduct surface option is an “open question”. The state has $2.8 billion lined up for a viaduct replacement, with a rebuild costing about $4 billion, and a surface option something like $2 billion.

So I have an idea. You want Seattle to be an “international city” in the future, let’s do what hundreds of other “international cities” have done and spend the $2billion difference between the surface and the rebuild on light rail. $2 billion should be able to a buy LRT subway from West Seattle to lower Queen Anne and possibly even Interbay, especially with a bit of federal funding thrown in.

What do you say?

6 comments