In 2004 California released an excellent service-led plan to expand its state rail network, both the high-speed rail projects and other corridors and a few BRT connectors. This video by nandert goes in-depth on why service-led planning is an important paradigm all agencies should use (5:33), the benefits of California’s plan, and how the governing boards would need major structural changes and reforming their priorities to actually make it happen this well.
He defines service-led planning as “Start by determining where the transit demand and need is, and tailor the plan to meet that demand.” In other words, determining how much of what kind of service each corridor needs. Then draw up cost estimates for the resulting lines to operators (agencies). The California plan specifies the rail/bus mode and frequency, but you could also leave the mode for a later step before assigning them to agencies, as Jarrett Walker does.
The difference between this and most transit planning is, corridors are chosen to meet the bulk of mobility/trip needs, without certain city/county jurisdictions having undue influence to override these for demands that contradict them. It also puts frequency first in the spec rather than leaving is as an afterthought, so the public can see what minimum frequency the entire network or each project will have so that they can see what their experience will be like.
This is an open thread.
6 comments




