Page Two articles are from our reader community. Sign up for an account.

A Quick Snap of Island Transit Route 411C
My recent photo of an Island Transit 411C Camano Bus

Full disclosure: The below letter to the editor by me ran in the Stanwood-Camano News today.

Bus service

Camano should switch to Community Transit

Dear Editor:

Island Transit is removing its county connector services from Whidbey to Skagit.

This is after the unilateral withdrawal of the Camano to Everett Island Transit connector service last June. Without state support, Island Transit cannot continue to provide those services. Representative Dave Hayes has finally proposed a fare on Island Transit in return for some state support.

But perhaps I have a thought for my Camano Island friends: Maybe with the lassitude that Island Transit board meetings are run, where charging a fare to reenlist state support in many meetings since November when the county connector crisis came to light has not happened and with the Island Transit board being so inaccessible to Camano Island.

Perhaps the time is right for Camano Island to change to Community Transit as your transit provider.

At least Community Transit’s finances are in great shape. has good public communications and is about to seek a three-tenths of 1 percent tax increase to dramatically increase service. Can you say any of those things about Island Transit?

Just something to debate – namely changing transit taxing districts to get a better provider.

Figured some of you in the transit advocate community would want to discuss this.  Island County Commissioner Rick Hannold also told the Stanwood-Camano News in part:

The board is not sure how long the routes will be cut. Hannold said they are investigating the initiation of a fare system that would help to alleviate the burden of the 411 routes’ additional expense.
“I’ve been pushing for a fare system since the get-go,” Hannold said. “Riders need to have a stake in this; it doesn’t come for free.”
A fare system, he said, would be helpful in many ways.
For one, the House and the Senate have approved funding for the Everett connector, Hannold said, though it is awaiting the governor’s signature. To benefit, though, Island Transit is required to include fare boxes in each of their buses.
Additionally, if fare boxes are installed, Island Transit can apply for Medicaid reimbursement for paratransit expenses –a special service for disabled individuals not accommodated by the regular bus service.
Paratransit costs Island Transit approximately $1.5 million per year.
In April alone, Hannold said, the cost for paratransit services was $70,000, while Island Transit spent $180,000 on all other services combined.
“It’s costing us so much, and we’re required by law to provide it,” he said. If they could alleviate some of the cost associated with that service, Hannold thinks money could be redirected toward other things, which may include reintroducing the 411 routes down the road – a service that has cost them around $500,000 over the past six months.
“We just don’t have it,” Hannold said.

Figure this will help fuel the debate that should have happened, like oh, last November.  I even had inside information on 2 July of 2014 this was a distinct possibility.  Yet no action until too late… the blame falls on both Skagit Transit & Island Transit for not being proactive with contingency planning for this day.

4 Replies to “North by Northwest View 19: Time for Camano Island to Pivot to Community Transit?”

  1. [ad hom]

    Anyway, the medicaid reimbursement would be for the equivalent fare collected from other non-medicaid passengers. So instituting a fare for strictly this purpose would be stupid and idiotic.

    Now, Camano couldn’t annex to CT even if all parties wanted. Camano, because they are in unincorporated Island County, could break off from the Island County PTBA and form their own unincorporated PTBA. This unincorporated PTBA could then contract with CT for service. But I can assure you it would be at a level significantly less useful than provided now. The unincorporated PTBA could not provide its own service in-house, nor could it collect funds from the federal government. This is because the unincorporated PTBA would not exist as a corporation, but strictly as a tax mechanism which could then be used by member jurisdictions to provide service. As it is in unincorporated county lands, that jurisdiction would be the Island County government, and by extension the Island County Commissioners.

    1. Where in the RCW does it say a PTBA can’t cross county lines?
      Not doubting you or challenging, I’m just curious because I never heard that.

Comments are closed.