Two Holiday Essays

Greenwich Village Street Scene (wikimedia)

Two posts about urban planning and design for the holiday:

First, Vancouver, BC planner Larry Beasley gave a talk in the DC area and afterwards had a chat with the Greater Greater Washington folks.  He shares how Vancouver made sure that its high-rises made positive contributions to the urban fabric, although he’s not exactly for tall buildings everywhere.  My favorite quote:  “Government has to be an ally of the architect against all the other things that homogenize design.”

Second, a very thoughtful essay in The Atlantic on urban ideals, change, and gentrification. The Manhattan neighborhood that Jane Jacobs immortalized was not timeless, but in fact a snapshot of an area in the midst of the gentrification process.

I’m still digesting these and have nothing to say or add. Now go out and do something worthwhile on this Memorial Day; a whole bunch of people suffered and died to give you the chance.

Sound Transit June 2010 Service Change

[UPDATE: ST planner Jim Moore explains about the 522:

When originally written, the routing change was the fact that we returned to the express lanes.  Later on, we revised the routing in the SODO area to eliminate right turns from westbound Holgate Street to northbound SODO Busway.]

The new ST schedule book, effective June 12, is out.  Aside from “minor schedule adjustments”, there are new trips on the 535 and 577, ne2 Saturday service for the 578, and fewer on the 586, 590, 592, and 593.

The booklet claims new routing for the 522 but looking at old and new maps I can’t figure out what the change is.

ST Express Fares Up Tuesday

ST Express Proposed Changes
Proposed changes to ST Express bus fare.

As previously reported, Sound Transit’s Express bus fares are going up at the beginning of next month.  The one-zone fare is rising from $1.50 to $2.00, catching up with Metro’s fare escalation.  The Senior one-zone fare is also going up from 50 cents to 75 cents.  This is part of a two-stage fare simplification as depicted above.

More significantly, the concept of a “two-zone fare” now only applies to the fare zones within King County.  Any trip that crosses a County Line is an “multi-county” fare, effectively the old three-zone fare ($3.50).  For adults going Pierce-South King, Snohomish-North King, or Snohomish-East King, this amounts to a 50 cent increase; it’s also an increase for youth and seniors making similar trips.

One big winner from this change is Community Transit, whose South County-King County commuter fare is $3.50 for adults. Already $1.00 over the competing ST fare, CT felt it couldn’t increase commuter fares in the latest round of budget cuts.  With the gap back to 50 cents and on its way to zero, they may feel able to do so in the future.  Raising commuter fares is a (relatively) progressive move, as these riders are more likely to be well-off.

All local fares for CT are also going up Tuesday, from $1.50/$1.00/$0.50 for adult/youth/senior to $1.75/$1.25/$0.75.

These changes are of course driven by revenue shortfalls, but they are also steps towards the fare synchronization that many riders are interested in seeing.  On the other hand, advocates of more distance-based fares will be disappointed.

The Socioeconomic Implications of Tolling the Bridges

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

As readers of this blog probably know, starting next year, WSDOT will begin collecting tolls on the SR-520 floating bridge to start to collect money for the eventual rebuild.

I personally believe this is something of a sleeper issue in the region. I’m not sure how many commuters have fully internalized this fact, and I’m anticipating a bit of a public sh*tstorm as people slowly realize that this is going to affect them. I’m happy to be wrong on that! Just my gut feeling. [Personally, of course, I support the tolls.]

Be that as it may, tolling will reshape our regional landscape in ways we haven’t yet anticipated. As it is, the lake creates a psychological barrier that makes everything seem further away than it really is. Bellevue is about as far away from downtown Seattle as Ballard as the crow flies, yet Bellevue seems much farther. Tolls on the bridges will increase this sense of distance, by adding another barrier to crossing the lake.*

In what other ways might tolls affect the region? Seattle Bubble speculates about whether it will change real estate patterns, as people seek to move closer to their employers:

What if we make a more extreme assumption about the cost of tolling to a daily exurban freeway commuter? Let’s say the new everywhere tolls add $20 a day to their commute costs. That’s about $400 a month, which is approximately equivilent to $80,000 in purchase power at 5% interest. Now we’re talking. That’s more than the difference between the median prices of Marysville and Shoreline.

Meanwhile, the Prosperity Partnership sees the potential for a flourishing Eastside arts movement, as Eastsiders balk at driving to Seattle for culture:

…because there isn’t a fully vital arts community yet on the eastside, economic theory would tell us that folks would be willing to invest in the short term to build that infrastructure if it saves them money in the long term.

Interesting! Only time will tell, as they say, but I’d wager that we’re in for a big change. I wouldn’t be surprised to see new talk of splitting up King County in two, an idea that has resurfaced from time to time.

*Of course, bus commuters won’t be affected by the tolls directly, except in the sense that the buses will become more reliable as traffic abates.

Nickerson Road Diet Support Group

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Even before SDOT announced their intent to put Nickerson St. on a road diet, a pro-roads group gathered support from Magnolia and Queen Anne to try and kill it, forming a “15th Ave W coalition” whose believes “any proposal that reduces the carrying capacity of Nickerson [for trucks and automobiles] is unacceptable.”  Through luck and great work on SDOT’s part, a study has been released showing how wonderful the road diet there has been, mostly keeping vehicle capacity while strongly decreasing accidents and increasing bike flow.

A new group has been formed to support the Nickerson road diet.  If this is something you’d like to fight for, join the google group here.  (and yes, it’s sad that we have to fight for every mile of minor bike and pedestrian improvement in our city)

PT Tomorrow, Round 2

"Growth" Plan (Pierce Transit)

Based on the first round of public input, Pierce Transit has refined their future service concepts. A very nice website compares the current system with what it will look like after the coming budget cuts.  A third map depicts the route structure if the sales tax increases from 0.6% to the maximum 0.9%, allowing not only preservation of service, but actually a little bit of growth.

Also, to build on a recent theme, lots and lots of system maps!

Tacoma Tomorrow has the public meeting times and promises analysis in the near future.

Senate Mulls Transit Operating Subsidy

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) (Wikimedia)

Historically, the federal government tends to directly subsidize transit capital expenditure, not operating expenditure.  However, with operating budgets collapsing nationwide, Chris Dodd and seven other Senators have proposed a $2 billion fund to help transit agencies through their current revenue trough.  Local reaction here (summary: Yipee!).

It’s important to understand that this is an “authorization”, not an “appropriation”, so even if this measure passes lawmakers would have to add it to an appropriations bill sometime in the next 16 months.  This comment covers how the money would be distributed; since I’m entirely ignorant of the relevant statutes I’ll just say that strictly according to King County’s population, Metro would be in line for $12m.  That’s perhaps a quarter of the deficit in 2012, so it’s nice, but hardly solves the problem even in the short term.