No Levies with ST2 on Ballot?


Seattle may have no levies if ST2 goes back to the ballot this year according to Crosscut:

“There’s a very good chance Sound Transit will go this fall,” says Richard Conlin, city council president and Sound Transit board member. The three-county agency wants a second try at extending the light rail line, which was defeated last November. And local leaders seem to be giving that plan the right of first refusal when it comes to securing ballot real estate.

Says Conlin: “If we have a Sound Transit issue on the ballot, we ought to be very careful about whether we put any other issues on the ballot.” That sounds like no city levy to me.

That’s Like… Really Soon!

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Could we really be driving across a new 520 bridge in just 6 years?

2018 always seemed like a bit of a worst-case estimate to me. We’ll see what happens with the discussions between the various community groups, of course, but this is good news indeed. Especially the part where it magically gets cheaper.

Regionalism, "Affordable Housing"

I usually don’t post “What he said” items, but…

what Frank at Orphan Road said.

The especially interesting part to me:

As to the childless part, again, if we’re one region, why does it matter? If we’re all connected by a reliable transit network, why can’t families choose to live in the suburbs? But even that’s besides the point, since, many families can afford to live in Seattle, they just have other priorities. They could choose to live in a smaller house, with little or no yard (but close access to a fantastic public park system), and rest easy that their teenagers aren’t speeding up and down Route 202 late at night to get to their friends’ house. It’s a choice.

It’s an interesting rebuttal of all the Ballard vs. Federal Way stuff we have floating around in the Transitsphere. The poor are likely to be far from the city core in the future and deserve to be served too.

He’s 100% right that affordability is a matter of family priorities. You can live in the city, with low transportation costs and space per person in line with what our recent ancestors had, or you can have your McMansion on the outskirts. On the single renter side, having a roommate is hardly a violation of human rights, and cuts your housing costs by 30% or so.

Anyway, the Seattle city limit should be of no consequence in our thinking about these issues.

Do you have Rapid Ride Questions?

Last week, I asked you guys for questions about the streetcars, and you guys put great question and I think we got some great answers.

Now I’m going to try it again, this time with King County Metro’s Rapid Ride, the bus rapid transit system they are putting in place as part of Transit Now! passed in 2006.

So do you have rapid-ride questions? Questions about BRT in general? Leave them in the comments so when I talk to Metro this week I can get your question answered.

Regionalism

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

I think Goldy’s basically right about the fear of regionalism in greater Seattle. We are, in fact, one big family, one big economy, and it’s silly to pretend otherwise. That said, I think the obvious rejoinder is that Goldy’s native Philly, where I lived myself for a few years, is a 19th-century hub-and-spoke city, whereas Seattle is not. So it makes sense that we’ve got a slew of Edge Cities, to use Joel Garreau’s phrase, that don’t consider themselves tied to the urban core (and are certainly not old-style bedroom communities the way Bala Cynwyd is).

But what really gets my goat is this Seattle Times op-ed, the genesis of Goldy’s post, that gives us the tired lament that Seattle is (a) too expensive and (b) too childless:

For the working middle class, people who traditionally lived comfortably in Seattle, the firefighters, police officers, teachers, even professors, it has become harder to buy a home and raise a family.

As economist Dick Conway put it, the region has affordable housing, it just may not be in Seattle. If it is OK for everyone to move to Kent or Duvall or Idaho, for that matter, then no problem. But that is impractical.

So if you’re a teacher, it’s impractical to live in Kent and work in Seattle? Why? Sound Transit proposed expanding light rail to Tacoma so that that nice teacher from Kent could enjoy a comfortable, reliable commute to Tacoma, Seattle, Northgate, the UW, Bellevue, or Redmond, and maybe even grade some papers on the way home at night.

But the Seattle Times didn’t want that, so it recommended a “no” vote on Prop 1.

As to the childless part, again, if we’re one region, why does it matter? If we’re all connected by a reliable transit network, why can’t families choose to live in the suburbs? But even that’s besides the point, since, many families can afford to live in Seattle, they just have other priorities. They could choose to live in a smaller house, with little or no yard (but close access to a fantastic public park system), and rest easy that their teenagers aren’t speeding up and down Route 202 late at night to get to their friends’ house. It’s a choice.

STB Meet-Up Saturday

Saturday, March 8th, 7pm at the Columbia City Alehouse. Great fish tacos, better transit discussions.

The number 7 bus stops right in front. Hope to see you there!

I hate you, Metro pass sales site

UPDATE below.

Now confronted with coughing up 75 cents* every time I board a Sound Transit bus, and refusing to carry around several rolls of quarters everywhere I go, I’ve decided to pick up a few ticket books. Little did I know how difficult that would be.

First of all, there is no 75-cent option at the ticket book store, despite this being a fairly obvious need for a lot of people. Community Transit, whose ability to assign creativity and common sense to problems makes me quite envious, manages to have 75-cent tickets, and indeed every 25-cent increment from a half dollar. So I can use those on any Sound Transit bus, right? Er, not quite:

Community Transit (and Everett Transit) tickets are only valid on ST Express routes operated by Community Transit (510, 511, 513, 532, 535).

D’oh! That’s seamless integration for you!

Well, there’s the next best option: buying a 25-cent and 50-cent ticket book. That’s more paper to shuffle around, and slower boarding for everyone, but it’s better than messing with quarters. So I’ll just buy 20 of each, right?

[Note: Blogger ate the screen capture I had here. The punch line is that 25-cent tickets come in packs of 16, 50-cent tickets in packs of 20.]

I can’t fathom any reason at all for the difference in quantity. It’s not cashier convenience: 20 25-cent tickets for $5.00 is easier, change-wise, than 16 for $4.00. So now I have to buy five 25-cent books and four 50-cent books or condemn myself to a somewhat complicated inventory management problem.

This kind of customer convenience is one of the best reasons to take an SOV to work.

*Aside: Why not just buy a $2.50 Puget-Pass? You have to take 36 trips a month for a Puget Pass to pencil out. If I take an ST bus in the morning and a Metro trip in the afternoon, only the $2.25 pass is worthwhile. If I often take an evening carpool to a Seattle-side bus stop, the $1.75 pass is the only one worthwhile. More commonly, of course, this dilemma applies to anyone who usually commutes in-city but occasionally has to go across the lake or down-county.

UPDATE 4:07pm: And we’ve gone from the infuriating to the absurd:
Now 25-cent tickets aren’t even an option! Perhaps Metro is getting back at me.