Suburban Revival Story

Wednesday’s “All Things Considered” on NPR had a piece about a suburban revival transforming a DC suburb called Tysons Corner. Tysons Corner was developed from farms about forty years ago into a sprawling, car-oriented suburban nightmare, and with DC MetroRail planned through that area, urban planners are working to reinvent it. This description of driving around the area (about 3 minutes in) reminds me of the sort of places in our area I really hate, particularly Southcenter.

The whole story in general reminds me of Downtown Bellevue, which was never quite the suburban nightmare as Tysons Corner, but has been transforming into a proper city for the past few decades. Well, at least the downtown is transforming. I think that Link could have a similar effect on communities in our region, though I wonder which stations are going to transform the immediate area. Lynnwood, Tukwila, Northgate? Which areas do you think will be most re-invented by Light Rail?

First Major U-Link Contract on the Cheap

As we discussed in early August the downturn in the economy can have a silver lining: More contractors available for major construction projects like transit, and competition means that it can be cheaper to build a system. This is turning out to be true for the U-Link light rail extension which had its first major contact be rewarded to a bidder that was 34% below ST’s estimate:

The University Link light rail extension moved closer to construction today as six bids on the first major construction contract came in below cost estimates. Condon Johnson & Associates, Inc. is the apparent low bidder with a $19.4 million bid to prepare the area where a tunnel boring machine will pass beneath Interstate 5 in downtown Seattle, with a bid 34 percent below the $29.6 million engineers’ estimate.

That’s more than a $10 million difference and hopefully bodes well for the rest of U-Link. What remains to be seen is how Obama’s upcoming infrastructure plan will affect demand of contractors capable of major projects, such as light rail expansion.

Full press release after the jump.

Continue reading “First Major U-Link Contract on the Cheap”

Light Rail: Cheaper Than Expected

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

There’s news this morning that a bit of work that was estimated to cost $29.4M was bid at $19.6M. There were six bids – a very good sign. Now cost estimates are just estimates and they could have overvalued the cost of the work, but this may be a first hint at how cheap infrastructure projects can be during a recession.

ST Releases Third Quarter Ridership Numbers

Just as transit ridership soars across the country, we see local numbers explode as well.

Sound Transit bus and train ridership continued to climb during the third quarter, with total boardings increasing by 21 percent compared with the same period last year. Normally, transit boardings decline during the summer compared with the other seasons, but the highest year-to-date monthly ridership was recorded in July, when average weekday boardings exceeded 60,000. Mid-summer gasoline prices that averaged over $4 per gallon clearly contributed towards this surge. Since that time, average weekday boardings have dipped slightly but are still much higher than one year ago. All service modes are experiencing growth, including Tacoma Link.

Thus far, the economic downturn has not significantly affected Sound Transit ridership growth, and recent monthly boarding totals are holding up well, especially considering the large drop in gasoline prices that started in late September. Bus overcrowding continues to be a serious issue, but there is evidence that the severity of the problem has eased somewhat during the months of September and October with fewer reports of crush loading and pass-up conditions.

ST 3rd Quarter Ridership

You can read the full ridership report on the ST website. Overcrowded buses should be eased next year as the 100,000 service hour increase funded by Sound Transit 2 (aka Prop. 1) goes into effect.

Seatless in Seattle

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Any regular rider of Metro will be familiar with scenes like this, this and this. We are all use to it and I’m actually pretty suspired how well everyone deals with it. It is especially useful when the bus driver lets people off the back instead of making them squeeze down the aisle.

This problem is especially bad on the latest new flyer 60 foot articulated buses. The aisle in the front of the bus is very narrow. It is very hard and involves a good amount of maneuvering to get past someone in the aisle. Not only that but the articulated section no longer has anywhere to hold on to. You basically have to make a mad dash from the front to the back sections and hope the bus doesn’t turn.

Regardless of which type of Metro bus you are on this is almost always a problem. So why not take out seats? I’m guessing the major reason is that metro and transit agencies in general assume that people want to sit. I know I do but what about all of those people that are standing in the picture above. I’m sure they have come to expect it. I know I do if I’m getting onto a 7X.

Metro should take a proactive role in improving the capacity and ridership experience by better accommodating these riders. In this case making it more comfortable for riders to stand, i.e. making more room for them and giving them more places to hold on to.

Take a look at the pictures below that I took on my trip over the summer. This is what all of the buses in Spain look like. Notice all of the seating in the back? Parents with strollers board in the middle door and have plenty of room to maneuver. See the lean too seats on the left? They are very helpful as well. Circulation and standing room is prioritized in the front while seating capacity is prioritized in the back.


The next two pictures are from Venice. The buses still fill up but people standing are so much more comfortable. As you can see people are three wide and if someone needs to get off it isn’t hard for them to get to the door. All of the seats in the front are one wide and either face forward or backwards. Sideways seats like Metro’s aren’t better because you still only have room to stand one wide, and if you’re sitting down someone’s bag is usually right in your face. Not fun.


The next two are in a suburb of Munich. This was on the way back from a concentration camp and most of the people on the bus were American. See all the hand rails, especially in the articulated portion. Near all of the doors there is no seats which allows a huge number of people to stand there. The articulated portion of the bus also has lean too seats which I personally think are a much better use of that space than the mickey mouse seats that metro uses (if four people are sitting down good luck getting past them without tripping).


The last two are from the Paris Metro system, but I think it shows just how flexible you can get if you want to improve crush capacity while still providing more seating. These seats are located next to every door on the 8 line. When the train starts to get really crowded people sitting down stand up, freeing up a good amount of space as well as improving their comfort. They have something to lean against as well as not having bags in their face.


I’m essentially saying Metro should try out some of these ideas. They work in the rest of the world so there is no reason it can’t work here. How about removing some seats from of 7X buses or chronically overloaded buses. Another big concern of my is the RapidRide buses. If Metro wants these buses to be attractive and “rail like” it seriously needs to consider strategically removing seats so that riders can quickly get in and out. It will not be a good solution for all routes but it is just one thing that Metro can do to improve the rider experience on the cheap.

It’s Too Late Baby, Yeah it’s Too Late

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Too late for YAVO (Yet Another Viaduct Option), especially this one. The Chamber of Commerce can’t waltz in at the 11th hour with a plan of its own, nor can Frank Chopp.

If the Chamber would like to figure out a plan for replacing the largest downtown employer, WaMu, I’m all ears. That seems like a more pressing issue right now.

Under Budget

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Sound Transit Press Release:

The University Link light rail extension moved closer to construction today as six bids on the first major construction contract came in below cost estimates. Condon Johnson & Associates, Inc. is the apparent low bidder with a $19.4 million bid to prepare the area where a tunnel boring machine will pass beneath Interstate 5 in downtown Seattle, with a bid 34 percent below the $29.6 million engineers’ estimate.

Obviously this is a single data point, but it’s in line with my prediction from last month that construction companies with more time on their hands — due to the construction downturn — would start bidding down the costs.

Transit Ridership Continues to Grow

A story in yesterday’s Washington Post indicated that transit use continues to grow across the country, with the 6.5% growth from June to September breaking records:

Americans rode subways, buses and commuter railroads in record numbers in the third quarter of this year, even as gas prices dropped and unemployment rose. The 6.5 percent jump in transit ridership over the same period last year marks the largest quarterly increase in public transportation ridership in 25 years, according to a survey to be released today by the American Public Transportation Association.

Ridership growth began hitting record levels last year and continued through the first and second quarters of this year, spurred in large part by gasoline prices that topped $4 a gallon in July, the industry group said. But the third-quarter increase is notable, it said, because gas prices began falling and unemployment rose, trends that tend to drive ridership down.

As the economy continues to sour, it can become more appealing for those with easy access to transit to leave their keys at home or, even more, finally sell that car. A common theme you see in stories like this is that people try transit because of hardship — like the high gas prices that struck last summer — and end up deciding that they prefer this new, less car dependent lifestyle.

Op-ed: High Speed Rail – Seattle to Portland

by MIKE SKEHAN

Our economy is in shambles, infrastructure rotting away, global warming hanging over our heads and $5 or $10 a gallon gasoline not far off again. Sounds pretty gloomy, but soon, Congress will enact a stimulus-funding package to bootstrap our economy out of the doldrums.  The question is:  What do we do with the money?

It has to be for “projects ready to go”, and will likely be for only a 2 year period. Why not spend a large chunk of Washington State’s share of the pie on working towards high-speed rail, along the I-5 corridor, between Bellingham and Portland?

Continue reading “Op-ed: High Speed Rail – Seattle to Portland”

Give Me Your Mode Split!

This post originally appeared on Orphan Road.

Well it has been a week since I posted this. I know that over 50 people downloaded the file so fill them out and get them back to me. I promise you I’ll create some cool graphs. I hope it helped people be more contentious about what decisions they make when choosing modes.

Here is mine. I usually drive more on the weekend (to see my dad in Kirkland) but I have been a homebody because of finals. As you can see I have great transit accessibility in addition to living close enough to everything to making biking and walking a daily part of my life. I own a car but most of the time it is easier, cheaper, faster or more enjoyable for me to walk, bike or take the bus. I usually bike to school (unless it is raining) and take the bus to work downtown. It is actually kind of ironic that I own a car because I only have it for my last job which was up in shoreline where I worked for WSDOT. Go figure.