State Budget Provides a Little Help

wikimedia

In an under-reported angle, the various proposals to fill the State’s revenue gap had a valence for transit.  Unlike other tax increases, a reduction in sales tax exemptions also impacts agencies like Metro and Sound Transit that rely on sales tax.

In the end, the legislature extended sales tax to candy, gum, and bottled water, raising $64m annually for Olympia.  According to Metro spokesperson Rochelle Ogershok, that will result in about $3.3m for Metro.  Every little bit helps, but that’s a drop in the bucket compared to the $48m hole coming in 2012-2013, on top of 150,000 more hours of “low-impact” reductions through 2011.

Although CT will get some more money too, it would take about $2m to merely restart operations on Sundays and holidays, before purchasing any service hours for those days.

My sources tell me that there wasn’t much of a push by agency lobbyists to steer legislators in a more exemption-oriented direction.  Given that Mary Margaret Haugen was clearly, in retrospect, going to block any explicit help for transit, that would appear to have been a mistake.

A Blank Slate on 520

Portage Bay Bridge (wikimedia)

Dan Bertolet in PubliCola makes a compelling case that we aren’t thinking big enough on 520:

• keep the existing freeway between the water and I-5 (it’s the floating part that’s the safety risk)  [UPDATE: Many commenters have pointed out that this is not correct.]
• for a six-lane design, designate two transit lanes, two HOV lanes, and two general purpose lanes
• for a four-lane design, designate two HOV/transit lanes and two general purpose lanes
• for a four-lane design, limit use to transit and HOV only
• and how about the most radical solution of all: take the bridge out and don’t replace it?  [See also Knute Berger’s thought-provoking piece on this idea.]

The second, third and fourth of these are all clearly awesome from a transit advocate’s perspective, and would presumably cost less than the WSDOT’s current plan.  As a result, they wouldn’t have the effect of robbing funds from higher transit priorities.  More after the jump.

Continue reading “A Blank Slate on 520”

News Roundup: Double-Speak

Photo by Atomic Taco

This is an open thread.

Slog: Cap Hill Fights for Design on Aloha Extension

Slog has an interesting report on the Capitol Hill Community Council and its fight for the city to fund a study an extension of the First Hill Streetcar north to Aloha:

“If we’re going to build it, let’s build it right,” says Tony Russo, who designed the Capitol Hill Community Council’s kickass Broadway streetcar proposal, and has lobbied the city hard to extend the streetcar to the end of Broadway Avenue. “We need cycletracks and the extension, and we need them both now.” The Capitol Hill Community Council has been fighting to get an Aloha Street extension back on Seattle Department of Transportation’s agenda since it was cut due to the project’s budget constraints. An Aloha extension would cost an estimated $20 million dollars to build.

However, the Capitol Hill Community Council says this $20 million dollars isn’t pressing—the city has several years to come up with the money while it works on the main leg of the streetcar, and, as Russo put it, “Obama’s throwing money at streetcars right now.” Their concern is funding the $750,000 preliminary engineering study and environmental review, which they say needs to be completed by June of this year when SDOT and Sound Transit finalize contract agreements for the streetcar line. Currently, the scope of the contract is written to terminate construction of the streetcar at Broadway and East John Street, at the light rail station.

The report goes on to say that SDOT doesn’t believe that there is any deadline for preliminary engineering, which is consistent with my reporting. The issue is probably better explained as follows: Right now, Sound Transit doesn’t provide any funding to do preliminary engineering on an Ahola extension, and it would be easier to study the extension at the same time we plan the current streetcar plan. (Similar to how East Link is planning a connection between Overlake and downtown Redmond, even though it will probably be many years before that segment begins construction.)

However, Seattle’s Department of Transportation can’t study the Aloha extension without money to do so. It would make sense to ask ST to provide the funding for planning the extension since the streetcar budget is scheduled to come in millions under budget and the Mayor has said a top priority should be extending the line to serve north Broadway.  And if ST doesn’t give the city the opportunity, then the city could lose out on federal money since the extension won’t be “shovel-ready” for a future round of streetcar funding.

That’s the larger point: if ST doesn’t step up to the plate soon, no one will and the Aloha extension will most likely have to be entirely funded locally rather than with federal aid. And that means that the relatively cheap extension is unlikely to be built soon.

Feds Spoil Rail Expansion Dreams

PA Turnpike Toll Plaza (Wikimedia)

Update @ 5pm: Publicola helpfully reports that this could affect funding for SR-520.

Via the Transport Politic and Streetsblog DC:

After a year spent lobbying states to develop “alternative” revenue sources for replacing the federal government’s rapidly shrinking budget for roads and transit, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood rejected Pennsylvania’s request to implement tolls on I-80, citing a law that prevents such funds from being used for anything but the roads where they’re raised.

This is unfortunate in two ways.  First, quite aside from transit advocacy there’s a pretty strong case that congestion pricing on existing roads would improve the situation for drivers and freight traffic.  By restricting the use of this money you put a cap on how much you can charge this way.

More importantly, transit advocates have been contemplating tolling as the next big source of transit revenue, as there is little appetite for a further increase in the sales tax.  Those interested in finding a way to have an ST3 vote this decade may have to find the cash somewhere else.

The good news is that the law in question is the 1998 transportation bill, so this isn’t some kind of long-standing precedent.

Reminder: Bellevue Council to Discuss B2M/C9T Tonight

As we told you over the weekend, the Bellevue City Council is having an extended study session (PDF) tonight to discuss the Sound Transit Capital Committee’s recent recommendation for B2 modified and C9T as preferred alternatives for East Link.  This will be an important meeting as the council is expected to discuss the collaboration of a “term-sheet” with ST to move forward on C9T.  We’ve mentioned that the B7/C9T combination that the council favors is likely financially infeasible.  How the pro-B7 four-member quorum will respond is anyone’s guess.

A coalition of B2 and C9T supporters, led by the newly formed group Citizens for Responsible Transit (mentioned in our past news roundups), is expected to be in attendance tonight to support the capital committee’s decision.  For any Bellevue residents, potential future East Link users, or general pro-transit folk, we encourage you to go out and support reasonable alignments that will serve the South Bellevue Park and Ride and the downtown core.  The study session will be at 6pm at Bellevue City Hall in conference room 1E-113.  Oral comments will be taken at the beginning.

R8A Stage 2 Groundbreaking Wednesday

soundtransit.org

If you want to be the cool kid at Wednesday night’s meetup, you can attend the groundbreaking for Stage 2 of the I-90 two-way HOV project at 1 pm that afternoon, at the Mercer Island Boat Launch (3600 E. Mercer Way).  This project replaces the HOV express lanes in the center roadway so that light rail can be built there.  In the view of reverse commuters like me, it also improves on them by providing a carpool lane in both directions at all times of day.

The community built around STB should be proud of this particular event, as your emails were an important element of the campaign to prevent the legislature from defunding this project in 2009.