One Center City Plans Delayed

One Center City Draft Plans

Commuters face a collision of multiple transportation projects in a small place at one time. While delay of the Washington State Convention Center Addition project offers a slight reprieve, when buses do leave the tunnel sometime in 2019, the One Center City (OCC) plan is intended to keep buses, people and cars flowing through downtown during the “period of maximum constraint.”

After spending more than a year planning, the OCC group missed its goal of having a final mobility plan with near-term and long-term recommendations completed by December 2017. Though scheduled to meet monthly, the OCC Advisory Group hasn’t met since last September.

Nor has the city begun implementing the near-term recommendations released last September by the group. Those recommendations include installing a cycle track on 4th Avenue; shifting more buses to 5th and 6th Avenues; and converting 3rd Avenue to an all-day transit-only street.

This recent pause in the One Center City planning has transit advocates worried that time is running out to implement strategies that might lessen congestion and improve mobility. Continue reading “One Center City Plans Delayed”

| 23 comments

Transit Tourist: Melbourne

Train, tram, bus (Liamdavies/Wikipedia)

On a recent week-long business trip to Melbourne, Australia, I had the pleasure of attending a Twenty20 cricket match. I’m not a cricket die-hard. But as someone who’s coached youth baseball for a number of years, I’ve had to reflect a lot on its fundamentals. It was fascinating to see how minor and arbitrary choices in competition design take a game with similar athletic elements and turn it into something entirely different. It was an interesting meditation on what might have been had the designers of baseball been a little less imaginative.

For a Seattle resident, Melbourne’s transit system is also an exercise in alternate history. Melbourne has a lot of basic similarities to Seattle: about the same metro population, many immigrant groups, buildings from a 19th-century gold rush, a vertical Central Business District (currently a forest of cranes), and boundless single-family sprawl beyond. Admittedly, the topology is much less challenging.

But there were a series of midcentury decisions that turned out quite differently in Melbourne. Broadly speaking, Melbourne didn’t throw away its railroads when cars were the Next Big Thing. And so, the city is an outlier in several respects:

Continue reading “Transit Tourist: Melbourne”

| 43 comments

News Roundup: So Much Oxygen

Roosevelt Station under construction, Feb. 2018

This is an open thread.

44 comments

Legislature Calls it a Year; ST Revenue Dodges Big Hit

DASH Shuttle & Intercity Transit — two winners in the 2018 Legislature
Photo Courtesy Intercity Transit

Sine die came this evening in Olympia, with the Legislature managing to get its work done on time. There will be no extra sessions.

The big drama of the session was over Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5955, which started out a year ago as a bill to simply reimburse newer car drivers for the difference between the older and newer valuations on the Sound Transit portion of their motor vehicle excise taxes (car tabs). It would have resulted in a $780 million hit to Sound Transit’s revenue stream, and eventually $2.3 billion lost due to interest. This year, the Senate amended the bill to partially backfill Sound Transit’s revenue by redirecting money from the $518 million in education funding from ST taxes back into Sound Transit. The House Transportation Committee did an about-face on that move. In the end, the bill died on the House cutting room floor, with no agreement around any approach. Continue reading “Legislature Calls it a Year; ST Revenue Dodges Big Hit”

| 21 comments

Q & A with Sound Transit’s Executive Director of Operations

Bonnie Todd, Sound Transit’s Executive Director of Operations

Over a decade ago, when Bonnie Todd, executive director of operations, joined Sound Transit, the agency was focused on constructing the first phase of the light rail system. With less than two years before Link was scheduled to begin operating from downtown Seattle to SeaTac, Todd was charged with building and shaping the future operations department. In honor of International Women’s Day, the Seattle Transit Blog’s Lizz Giordano interviewed Todd about her experiences. (Answers have been edited for clarity and length.)

LG: What are some of the biggest changes you’ve seen in your 10 years at Sound Transit?

BT: Well, we opened light rail. That was huge. When I first got here, there wasn’t even really an operations department. There was this little group called ‘Transportation Services’; I’d always laugh and say that sounded like a hotel shuttle. I’ve since found out that on the West Coast it’s not an uncommon term for an operations group.

But [the operations division] was very small; the agency had been very capital-focused. When I came in, there was maybe 21 months until we were going to open light rail. There hadn’t been quite the focus on operations and it really crept up on us.

One of the things that was very enticing about the job offer was that I really had a blank canvas of sorts to work with. I had worked for the American Public Transportation Association for about four years, where I did audits of rail transit agencies all over North America. I had a real understanding of what worked well and what didn’t and what was critical to put in place for an operations department to be efficient, be safe and have the right processes in place. Continue reading “Q & A with Sound Transit’s Executive Director of Operations”

| 12 comments

Service Change: Metro’s Music Keeps Playing

KCM coach 6854 running route 101 with test white LED signage
KCM 6854 sporting unusual signage. Photo by Erubisu.

After almost three years without any significant service cuts, we’ve gotten pretty used to happy service change announcements from Metro.  The latest change, which begins this coming Saturday, March 10, is no exception.  Service additions are sprinkled throughout the system without much countervailing bad news.  (The redundant route 99 does disappear, but ridership numbers suggest that no one will notice.)  This service change brings no major restructures of service, so increased service is the big story.  It’s scattered throughout the system, but with a particularly welcome and overdue focus on the greater Kent area.

Other news includes:

  • a new approach to Renton-downtown service on routes 101 and 102;
  • construction reroutes in Sodo and the Central District (including significant hassles for the relatively few riders of route 4’s Judkins Park tail); and
  • minor routing changes in downtown Seattle and downtown Redmond to match changing traffic patterns.

Specifics below the jump.

Continue reading “Service Change: Metro’s Music Keeps Playing”

| 67 comments

“Shared Employee Shuttles” on the Horizon

Flickr/Atomic Taco

Employee shuttles are a common sight in many prospering cities. There are things to like as an independent observer: they often cover underserved source-destination pairs at no cost to the public. Conversely, they might make some public routes unviable, stranding non-employees who might have used the route. There are also sometimes conflicts with public transit for curb space.

Smaller employers don’t have the resources to set up these schemes at all. If the service replaces a widespread ORCA passport schemes, it takes resources from transit. Among the most farcical outcomes is the spectacle of empty Microsoft shuttles passing empty Amazon shuttles on SR520 where a public route could fill both legs.

Enter Metro’s “shared employee shuttles” program. This is part of the agency’s charter to promote alternate transportation solutions. Metro serves as a matchmaking service and “supervises” operations, but the funding and operations are private. The routes are meant to “complement” public transit routes rather than compete with them.

For employers, it’s a mixed proposition to be under Metro auspices. Metro says that state law makes them “the sole provider of public transportation services in King County,” so a rogue operation would be against the law. (The law a has an exception for single-employer shuttles.) Metro will facilitate right-of-way and curb space negotiations with cities. On the other hand, employers will pay a nominal fee for processing applications, and will have to share their performance and rider survey data with Metro.

The first “cycle” will accept proposals from groups of 2-5 employers through April 3, and the pilot program will run for about a year.

26 comments

Trailhead Direct to Continue for a Second Hiking Season

Trailhead Direct 2017 route
Credit: King County

Declaring the first season of Trailhead Direct a success, King County is preparing for a second season while considering expanding the program to North Bend.

Trailhead Direct provided hikers an option to access trails in the Issaquah Alps using public transportation. The pilot program, which ran on weekends and holidays from early August to mid-October, aimed to reduce congestion at trailheads and broaden access to public lands.  

Nineteen-seat vans ran every 30 minutes between 7 am and 6 pm, picking up riders at Issaquah’s two park-and-rides and stopping at three trailheads on Squak and Tiger mountains. Riders were charged an off-peak fare.

According to Lizzy Jessup, a project manager at King County Parks, about 900 hikers used the service, averaging roughly 40 riders a day. An on-board survey found over 90% of riders thought the service could reduce congestion at trailheads, and many riders wanted to see the service expand to more locations. The on-board survey also found hikers accessed the Trailhead Direct shuttles both by driving themselves to the park-and-ride lots and also by taking Metro route 271 and Sound Transit route 554 from Seattle.

Jessup said King County Parks and King County Metro Transit are still weighing possible changes to the route and timing of the shuttles for next year. She added that, due to low ridership, the stop at the Issaquah Highlands Park and Ride will probably be eliminated this year.

The two King County agencies also hope to expand the program and connect to trails in North Bend. Jessup said one consideration in North Bend is using satellite parking lots to add parking near trailheads.

On Tuesday, members of the outdoor community gathered to brainstorm ideas on alternative transportation to the outdoors and the future of the Trailhead Direct service, hosted by the Wilderness Society and the Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust.

Continue reading “Trailhead Direct to Continue for a Second Hiking Season”

| 18 comments